tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post1507110555181710675..comments2024-03-19T11:13:40.642-07:00Comments on A Different Perspective: Stephenville and the Men in BlackKRandlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06333125414889883920noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-67795657039477678472015-05-28T23:38:41.263-07:002015-05-28T23:38:41.263-07:00Either way, UFO, men in black, Bigfoot or whatever...Either way, UFO, men in black, Bigfoot or whatever, you're on my property in middle of nowhere, Texas no less, middle of night? You're getting a .308 winchester through the chest or vehicle. Its either burglary, unknown or something I'd rather have dead, because obviously the guy at the end of my driveway wasn't yelling to tell the guy to keep his dogs back. <br />Heck, I'd send the dogs and then shoot what/whoever it was. Texas, gotta protect, besides, IT left a shiny bullet, I would have been in the right protecting my own. Military, cop, whatever, unannounced means intruder, means target practice.<br /><br />OK, but if Bigfoot, that would necessitate my Barret 99 .50 cal. Examine the bodies in the light later lolAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01535858982705699608noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-48232058092262783922014-07-08T14:47:08.437-07:002014-07-08T14:47:08.437-07:00Here's the direct link to the Schulze / Powell...Here's the direct link to the Schulze / Powell MUFON radar analysis:<br /><br />http://www.ufocasebook.com/pdf/mufonstephenvilleradarreport.pdfSteve Sawyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17716314515943305158noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-51383121831269262422014-07-08T00:59:43.046-07:002014-07-08T00:59:43.046-07:00Stephen
Try the following two references for alter...Stephen<br />Try the following two references for alternative perspectives on the event.<br /><br />Schulze, G., Powell, R.. 2008 'Special Research Report: Stephenville Texas', MUFON<br /><br />Skeptical Inquirer, vol 33.1 (Jan / Feb 2009), 'The Stephenville Lights: What Actually Happened' http://www.csicop.org/si/show/stephenville_lights_what_actually_happened<br /><br />There may well be others but that should be a good start.Anthony Muganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09500170864254300321noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-37785275536780025082014-07-07T19:16:50.009-07:002014-07-07T19:16:50.009-07:00I haven't done any homwework, so maybe I don&#...I haven't done any homwework, so maybe I don't have a right to comment - nobody needs to reply, but I am curious, and this is about the sightings, not the MIB aspect. Was Stephenville "just" nocturnal lights in the sky, or were any "data points" (radar or other technological measurements) obtained? Thanks in advance for any info.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02677840720177238325noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-23781828508451397042014-07-07T00:35:03.400-07:002014-07-07T00:35:03.400-07:00Hi CDA
In one respect I'd be more restrictive ...Hi CDA<br />In one respect I'd be more restrictive than you suggest but in another way less so. Qualitative background checks may provide useful context, I agree, but are inevitably less than decisive and often somewhat subjective.<br />Cold cases are harder to investigate, but not impossible. Where quantitative data is available this doesn't decay in the way of memories. Galileo's observations of Jupiter are as valid today as four hundred years ago. In some respects older cases are better than very new ones as it allows time for data to emerge, competing analyses to become available and possibilities such as experimental devices to be more clearly assessed.<br />Overall though we seem to both be feeling the specific claim about MIB offers little prospect of a clear result.Anthony Muganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09500170864254300321noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-21231793920901983032014-07-06T06:36:46.517-07:002014-07-06T06:36:46.517-07:00You need to meet the witness himself before coming...You need to meet the witness himself before coming to any conclusions. His background, his interest in UFOs or MIBs, his reading and other activities. You certainly need to meet people who have known him in the past. If necessary (and it probably is not) he should be interviewed by experienced police or military investigators. <br /><br />For my part, I am quite prepared to say Sorrells made up the tale. But I am not really qualified so as you say, the case is best left alone. Certainly after 6 years it has been left too long to be of any use now.cdahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01005702597775594084noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-64557353307977808312014-07-06T04:46:35.691-07:002014-07-06T04:46:35.691-07:00Stephenville itself is one of perhaps a few dozen ...Stephenville itself is one of perhaps a few dozen cases, out of the many thousands reported, which has sufficient data to present a very strong case for a genuine UAP, in my opinion.<br />These sort of claims often seem to crop up but as far as I can see have no means of being tested at this time and the net effect seems to be largely to reduce the overall credibility of a report to a casual observer of the scene who may not be aware of the hard data underpinning the overall case.<br />As the question of the validity or otherwise of this specific claim can not really be tested ( although the point Kevin makes about how pilots react to specific scenarios may be suggestive) I would suggest that such claims should simply be left to one side at this time, until or unless that situation changes.<br />This might seem a little harsh, but by stripping the situation back to what can be tested with hard data solid conclusions can be drawn, at least to the extent possible by our current knowledgeAnthony Muganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09500170864254300321noreply@blogger.com