tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post3545409079675261106..comments2024-03-19T11:13:40.642-07:00Comments on A Different Perspective: The 1963 Santa Rosa UFO CrashKRandlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06333125414889883920noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-20688057052934321852020-02-25T11:14:03.381-08:002020-02-25T11:14:03.381-08:00I think that these stories may be true, as there h...I think that these stories may be true, as there have been hundreds and hundreds of UFO stories, and I don't thing all these people are lying, making a hoax, or exaggerating. Of course, some are natural objects, like balloons, clouds, etc. But, I think there are a lot that are unexplainable. pcamperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02095919610901529235noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-753850103129764422019-12-29T14:42:51.404-08:002019-12-29T14:42:51.404-08:00I think her name is really Napolitano. She was I B...I think her name is really Napolitano. She was I Brooklyn when it actually happened. This was observed by a few people including two CIA agents! Who never it was reported by not sureAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01872061178370265224noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-81129295378275358312011-02-18T03:56:29.337-08:002011-02-18T03:56:29.337-08:00While the FBI will certainly investigate a genuine...While the FBI will certainly investigate a genuine terrestrial abduction (or kidnapping) case, I do not think their scope extends to extra-terrestrial activities. This would lie outside their terms of reference. The same would apply to all law enforcement agencies in the US, and elsewhere.<br /><br />Did Linda Cortile ever report her abduction to the FBI? If not, why not? Did the SecGen of the UN, Perez de Cuellar, ever do so?cdahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01005702597775594084noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-68741327611025326612011-02-17T23:11:44.572-08:002011-02-17T23:11:44.572-08:00> He should be stopped, via either criminal san...> He should be stopped, via either criminal sanction or civil lawsuit<br /><br />Amen. I felt the same way after reading Jacobs' "Secret Life" and the Hopkins hypnosis sessions in "Close Encounters of the Fourth Kind" by Bryan.<br /><br />The FBI should look into these claims of abduction, if only to shine a light on the investigators (hey, these "abductions" are a violation of the Mann Act, so the feds have jurisdiction).Terry the Censorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13361088223337740598noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-67529887364259758552011-02-17T23:00:27.261-08:002011-02-17T23:00:27.261-08:00As an interesting sidelight to this case, Budd Hop...As an interesting sidelight to this case, Budd Hopkins has now written a lengthy response to Carol Rainey's Paratopia magazine article.<br /><br />See: http://tinyurl.com/45hnv35<br /><br />Of particular note, in reference to Kevin's blog post here regarding "The 1963 Santa Rosa UFO Crash," are Hopkins' comments attempting to refute Rainey's statements about this case.<br /><br />See Section VIII of Hopkins' article, entitled interestingly enough, "Deconstructing the Debunkers: A Response," where Hopkins discusses some specifics he claims contradict Rainey's statements about "the Beanie case."<br /><br />Excerpt:<br /><br />"The account my ex presents in her screed is extremely brief, concentrating as it does on any little details that she felt might tend to make it seem false or outrageous, so I feel an obligation to at least get the facts down clearly and accurately."<br /><br />So, essentially, Hopkins is now resorting, in a kind of desperate maneuver, to calling his ex-wife basically a debunker and liar. And "paranoid," to boot.<br /><br />I think this is to be expected of Hopkins, in his grasping attempts to egotistically reclaim some legitimacy as to his methods and findings, which I find both darkly suspect and quite dishonest. <br /><br />Hopkins also goes on in this article to state some rather unkind things about Walter Webb, apparently _still_ supports Beanie's contentions about the "crash," and drills down even further on his ex-wife to the point of suggesting she owes Beanie and others involved in the case an apology and retraction of her statements about it. <br /><br />The obvious implication is that he most probably thinks she also owes him an apology and recantation. <br /><br />What's worst in Hopkins article is how he mischaracterizes Rainey's statements "to claim or imply" all of Hopkins subjects must be hoaxers or liars, when it seems to me she actually suggests or implies they are largely, with a couple exceptions (Cortile and Mortellaro, who intentionally lied, and yet Hopkins <i><b>still</b></i> "believes" Cortile!), actually confabulating and delusional, not intentional hoaxers or liars, per se. <br /><br />Hopkins absolutely <i>cannot</i> admit he is wrong, due to his prior vested interests, and despite the facts in the Cortile hoax, and that brings into question his own mental equilibrium and honesty. <br /><br />I find Hopkins' self-serving and delusional hubris simply amazing. I pity his victims, not him. <br /><br />Rainey, IMHO, is correct about her ex-husband's lack of objectivity, manipulation, and sociopathic exploitation of his human subjects. <br /><br />His unscientific practices and egregious, non-professional use of regressive hypnosis techniques have consequently implanted false memories of alleged "alien abduction" in his victims. <br /><br />He should be <i><b>stopped,</b></i> via either criminal sanction or civil lawsuit, from <i>ever</i> using regressive hypnosis again on self-identified or susceptible "alien abduction" human subjects, both for their <i>and his own</i> mental health, well-being, and, hopefully, eventual recovery. <br /><br />These people need trained, professional help and therapy, not continued, damaging exploitation by an confused amateur with a determined, self-fulfilling agenda.Steve Sawyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17716314515943305158noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-959904607140978242011-02-14T00:09:42.914-08:002011-02-14T00:09:42.914-08:00Thanks for this little case study of the problems ...Thanks for this little case study of the problems of sole-sourched eyewitness testimony (and the attenuating issues).<br />Also, I'm glad you've read the Rainey article. I'm with you on this abduction nonsense. I read your book and it's still very credible; I hope you have more to say about Hopkins and Jacobs. (Maybe you have done -- I have yet to drop and roll through the firestorm at UFO Updates.)Terry the Censorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13361088223337740598noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-39889606298914083232011-02-07T11:51:54.968-08:002011-02-07T11:51:54.968-08:00Kevin:
There was another Bean connected with Roswe...Kevin:<br />There was another Bean connected with Roswell, a Beverly Bean, daughter of Melvin Brown. Beverly was first interviewed by Tim Good in London, then eventually transferred to you, I believe, via some intermediaries. But while Beverly told one interviewer that as a child she heard, from her dad, that there were two bodies, her sister heard, also from her dad, that there were three. <br /><br />Strange about the two and three bodies (twice) and the two (or is it three?) 'Beanies'. Crashed saucerology certainly throws up some anomalies and coincidences.cdahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01005702597775594084noreply@blogger.com