tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post5477157216494447562..comments2024-03-19T11:13:40.642-07:00Comments on A Different Perspective: Brigadier General Arthur Exon and J. Bond JohnsonKRandlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06333125414889883920noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-29888428073657845542017-12-19T19:02:02.547-08:002017-12-19T19:02:02.547-08:00It really makes me angry to hear about other UFO r...It really makes me angry to hear about other UFO researchers either stealing tips or claiming credit for other people's work. After seeing how Kevin is being treated by the BEAM people and then I recently saw a Kal Korf YouTube video where he claims he is suing Royce Meyer's UFO watchdog because of it's malicious lies of which he has plenty of examples but he only gives one which he claims is the best, his best evidence is that on UFO watchdogs hall of fame, Kevin Randle is included(?). Basically if you are honest researcher who simply goes by evidence and not ideology you get it from both sides and now that researcher can get Billy Meier supporters and Kal korf to unite. That is why although I wish Lance would see things the I and other people who know that the UFO phenomena is real, I still would trust him over anything that Linda Moulton Howe or Jaimie Manson would try to pawn off on the public. That is why I may feel bad about the current state of ufology but I also feel it's totally deserved and anything less than Donald Trump flying a Ufo over LA with a grey sitting next to him will raise the field into any sort of legitimacy.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14002512064230215525noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-39168377670732182752017-12-14T06:43:47.987-08:002017-12-14T06:43:47.987-08:00"But I’ll bet my skeptical pals will suggest ..."But I’ll bet my skeptical pals will suggest this is another reason that we should not place any emphasis on Exon’s statements."<br /><br />How right you are!<br /><br />Having read the one interview transcript given in ROSWELL UFO CRASH UPDATE (your paperback) and Exon's letter to you (printed in the same book), written after he had been interviewed four times, I for one would not attach any value at all to Exon's testimony. He says, in writing, that he knew nothing first-hand. It seems just a jumbled collection of memories, with no dates or chronology. <br /><br />OK so you got Exon's name from Johnson. How precisely did Johnson come to hear of Exon or know of Exon's existence? I presume they did NOT meet each other in July 1947! So how and when did they meet, if ever, or was it purely from certain TV shows or the reading of books/articles about the case during the 1989-91 period? <br /><br />If that interview in your book is any guide, Exon's testimony about Roswell is a total washout. Didn't he once claim to have flown over the (assumed) debris field soon after the 'crash'?cdahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01005702597775594084noreply@blogger.com