tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post5909238660937801262..comments2024-03-19T11:13:40.642-07:00Comments on A Different Perspective: Nazi UFOs and RoswellKRandlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06333125414889883920noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-88889152670789374772011-02-07T07:58:39.744-08:002011-02-07T07:58:39.744-08:00The whole Nazi "flying disk" myth is ver...The whole Nazi "flying disk" myth is very important to understanding the psycho-social aspects of the phenomenon. <br /><br />Whether by human design or engineered by a nonhuman intelligence, this phenomenon seems to have a pattern for social acculturation - "cultural tracking." <br /><br />It doesn't matter if the Nazi regime had actual flying disks. What matters is how this myth is disseminated to society. <br /><br />For example, Kenneth Arnold never saw objects shaped like "flying saucers," but the initial report did imply such an object. <br /><br />Also, when you look at the abduction phenomenon you see exactly the same response from the public. The typical "grays" were not reported very much, if at all, prior to the sixties. But, during the eighties several popular books and movies came out describing these entities. A study by Ballester Olmos reveals a very definite pattern with the images presented in popular culture with the reports of abductions and the types of entities reported.TLChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05396847485232879796noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-26221136762201633192010-07-08T12:09:45.998-07:002010-07-08T12:09:45.998-07:00James -
Do you believe that I wasn't aware of...James -<br /><br />Do you believe that I wasn't aware of your research? Was I not at the Symposium last year?<br /><br />Yours was another explanation for the Roswell UFO crash that avoided the alien explanation... Just as Redfern had done... Just as the Air Force has done.<br /><br />I was listing the alternative explanations that have been offered in the last few years and yours is one of those.<br /><br />There was nothing irresponsible about my comment.KRandlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06333125414889883920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-23611124415058717262010-07-08T09:47:58.019-07:002010-07-08T09:47:58.019-07:00The only flaw I see here is lumping my research in...The only flaw I see here is lumping my research in the same bucket as Korff's and Redfern's research. <br /><br />Take the time of a responsible researcher and review the video presentation titled "Russian Espionage and UFOs" at http://www.centerforufotruth.org before make another irresponsible assertion about my research.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11438254780009775480noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-40276047925933502462010-07-05T21:05:33.076-07:002010-07-05T21:05:33.076-07:00Hi Kevin,
I'd like to interview you on "...Hi Kevin,<br /><br />I'd like to interview you on "Conundrums", do you have an email address I can contact you with?<br />Please drop me a line at my site:<br />http://conundrumstv.blogspot.com<br /><br />I'd love to have you on the show if you are interested!<br />J.Jay Michael, Producer:https://www.blogger.com/profile/12948052116308185815noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-23619398282289921242010-07-02T06:44:39.726-07:002010-07-02T06:44:39.726-07:00"Sometimes you just have to risk the wrath of..."Sometimes you just have to risk the wrath of the unwashed to make an important point."<br /><br />Forgetting for a moment that Carrion and Korff —which on reflection sounds like a firm of facile litigators— abundantly display no "there" there, "unwashed" is one thing, "soiled" and "deliberately soiling" is another thing altogether.<br /><br />Who quotes "Korff" on anything? I suspect the lovely Mr. Carrion will soon discover an inauspicious liability for doing so.<br /><br />Hat's off to you, though, Lt. Colonel Randle.<br /><br />alienview@roadrunner.com<br />> www.AlienView.net<br />>> AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/<br />>>> U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.comAlfred Lehmberghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02028589165474437987noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-47536777670790288702010-06-25T19:00:14.970-07:002010-06-25T19:00:14.970-07:00Yes, I'll try to see if I can find it. It was ...Yes, I'll try to see if I can find it. It was an older interview (I'm guessing about a year and a half back), and I know it was not the Project Camelot interview transcript-- I had a quick look at that today while I was at work, and there is really no discussion at all in that interview about verification of sources, yea or nay (another interviewer oversight, I think).<br /><br />The oldest things I've been able to find on a search are interviews he gave to Rumor Mill News, The Byte Show, and Red Ice Creations Radio, but all that's left are the archived MP3s of the shows. I also know he was on C2C, but as I said, I seem to remember it was an interview transcript that I read. I even remember that I talked to someone at work about it after the fact, as legit primary sources are so important to people writing papers, etc. Anyway, I will keep digging, and I'll listen to some of the archived stuff and see if I can find it there.Thorn Harefoothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06712811228926265329noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-50386357618220564042010-06-25T12:12:24.069-07:002010-06-25T12:12:24.069-07:00T'Zairis -
Can you direct u to that specific ...T'Zairis -<br /><br />Can you direct u to that specific interview. I would like to see the context and the precise words that he used. This does seem to be a stunning revelation.KRandlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06333125414889883920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-34487595845582475762010-06-24T21:55:45.413-07:002010-06-24T21:55:45.413-07:00I have been leery of Farrell since I read an onlin...I have been leery of Farrell since I read an online transcript of an interview in which he stated that he was not really concerned with whether or not the various (supposed) Nazi sources/documents he based his research on were 'genuine'; he was much more concerned with whether or not the documents were 'internally consistent with one another'. As a person who works in a library and helps people to find usable, reliable sources for various research papers, etc., I can tell you that documents can be internally consistent from here to next week, but if they are proven to be fake, all the internal consistency (between fakes) means nothing.<br /><br />It was a funny sort of throw-away remark that was made as a non-answer to a question about where he got his source material from, and the interviewer actually let his non-answer stand, even though what Farrell had basically said was that he was not concerned with whether or not his sources were in fact genuine. I remember that at the time I read the interview, it blew me away that he'd actually admitted openly that he really hadn't vetted anything he was using, which makes his work useless from a scholarly point of view.<br /><br />Since that interview, I have simply ignored his writings as entirely conjectural, as I suspect that a goodly amount of his 'source material' is bogus.Thorn Harefoothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06712811228926265329noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-4497446126969963172010-06-23T18:39:54.647-07:002010-06-23T18:39:54.647-07:00"Nazi UFOs and Roswell"? WTF?
You'v..."Nazi UFOs and Roswell"? WTF? <br />You've <i>gotta</i> be kiddin' me. <br />Why even bother with this crap?<br /><br />Good lord, just that premise alone should be enough to inform those even minimally aware of history that this is a ridiculous canard. <br /><br />And Kolonel Kal K. Korff? The man has nearly always been an obvious fraud, self-aggrandizer, liar, cynic, CSICOPian monstrosity, and just plain batshit crazy for many, many years now. This is very well known. <br /><br />I would enjoy his attempting to sue anyone for telling the truth about his sociopathic modus operandi and pathological behavior, false claims, and absurd, hilarious "investigatory" actions over the past 10 to 15 years, at least. He's not even worthy of being laughed at--he's plainly just sick in the head. He is only to be remotely pitied. <br /><br />"The horror. The horror!" <br />--Kurtz in Conrad's "Heart of Darkness"<br /><br />Forget him. And if Farrell wrote a book based largely on Korff's unvetted, unattributed second and third-hand assertions and wild blatherings, then he too is kind of a blinded idiot. <br /><br />These guys, just like Billy Mumy's malign character in an infamous episode of the Twilight Zone did to anyone who bothered him (playing Anthony Fremont, a six-year old monster and mutant with godlike mental powers in "It's A Good Life"--see: http://bit.ly/6K5aZ), deserve to be "wished away into the cornfield," only in deference to the Roswell case, they should instead be wished away into the "debris field," and forever disappear into their own self-created and odious sulphuric ozone.<br /><br />These clowns just cannot be taken seriously by anyone serious. Korff is a thief, confabulator of extraordinary degree, and just plain "bad man, a very bad man" as even little Anthony, age six, could tell you just before he wished them away, but not before turning them into living jack-in-the-boxes, with spring-loaded bobbly heads loosely a'jouncin' around, babblin' bovine offal to the gullible "unwashed." <br /><br />Hmmmm. That imagery may be more real-life than many might think, metaphorically speaking. 8^}Steve Sawyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17716314515943305158noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-17735976948227523702010-06-22T11:31:02.156-07:002010-06-22T11:31:02.156-07:00CDA -
I don't think Korff did any real invest...CDA -<br /><br />I don't think Korff did any real investigation for his book. He just cobbled together the writings of many others in an attempt to attack the Roswell Story. I don't believe he contacted the FBI about Sleppy... nor do I believe he called the Pentagon to learn the Amry was segragated in 1947. Had he done that, he would have learned what it meant.<br /><br />I know that I talked to Timothy Good about this sometime in 1989 and showed him the Roswell Yearbook so that he could see Brown's picture in it. I believe Don Schmitt got the actual name of Bean from Stan Friedman, though I could be wrong about that. I know that Don arranged for a video taped interview with Bean, her sister and her mother in March 1990and Jan 1991. I have a copy of the video tape.<br /><br />Say what you will about the Bean statements but the only real problem with them is that they are second hand. There are all sorts of pitfalls there... but Brown was in Roswell in 1947 which put him ahead of some of those telling tales.KRandlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06333125414889883920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-62556251184514539902010-06-22T06:47:49.314-07:002010-06-22T06:47:49.314-07:00Agreed, the Nazi UFO connection is dotty. And I do...Agreed, the Nazi UFO connection is dotty. And I do not accept Nick Redfern's Roswell solution either. <br />Also agreed, publishers do not check books for accuracy either. <br /><br />No, Korff will not be suing anyone. These threats are pretty empty I guess, but people often make them to put fear into other writers. Where are those 7 or 8 Roswell books he promised us in 2007? I have never seen or heard of any of them. Do they exist?<br /><br />Regarding Melvin Brown, neither you nor Korff give the true origins of this Brown testimony. As far as I can tell, it first arose after the publication of Timothy Good's "Above Top Secret" in 1987. Beverly Bean, a Londoner, contacted Tim and told him about her father's involvement at Roswell. Bev had recalled her dad telling his daughters about it soon after he had seen a review of the "Roswell Incident" book c. 1980 in a British tabloid. (Other accounts from Beverly say Brown first related this to them during the Apollo landings, which were about a decade earlier, so take your pick which is correct).<br />Evidently Tim heard this tale from Bev and passed it to Len Stringfield. Where did it go from there? Nowhere do you, or Korff, say how it reached you and/or Don Schmitt. Why cannot you tell us the true path this story took? It has passed through quite a few people's hands, hasn't it? The impression given in your book is that it just 'fell into your lap' from Brown's daughter. It did not.<br /><br />My own view is that the Brown-Bean story is a shambles and a useless piece of tittle-tattle, but I am not blaming you for this. It is the kind of story that retired soldiers tell to their family when they want to enliven their childrens' lives a bit. Of course it would be beneficial if we could see the original tabloid newspaper that, supposedly, prompted Brown to entertain his daughters in the first place. We don't even know their ages.<br /><br />Pity Korff could not, or would not, locate this himself or at least give the origins of Brown's tale.cdahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01005702597775594084noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-57934374042964466092010-06-22T05:14:33.817-07:002010-06-22T05:14:33.817-07:00"..had the nazis been able to develop somethi..."..had the nazis been able to develop something like that the war would've ended differetly."<br /><br />Proponents of the silly notion could claim they came too late to affect the outcome, just like the Type XXI and Amerikabomber. But I don't buy IT.starmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09884942748644499035noreply@blogger.com