tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post6670288014333775643..comments2024-03-19T11:13:40.642-07:00Comments on A Different Perspective: X-Zone Broadcast Network - A Short Summary of the Discussion with Robert SheafferKRandlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06333125414889883920noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-88808423416348516452020-06-10T14:58:52.804-07:002020-06-10T14:58:52.804-07:00Adam S. -
Don and I have recorded the shows, and ...Adam S. -<br /><br />Don and I have recorded the shows, and they will appear here soon. By coincidence, this question (sort of came up) so that program offers an answer. I think it was that Stringfield didn't trust Hynek because of his connections to the Air Force. Don and I do talk about this on the program.KRandlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06333125414889883920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-14833582925970864292020-06-09T20:28:20.318-07:002020-06-09T20:28:20.318-07:00"it is clear that you misunderstood his motiv..."it is clear that you misunderstood his motivations"<br /><br />Kevin, <br /><br />I would be curious as to your opinion on this. Vallee and Hynek never trusted Stringfield because he would never share the names of his sources or his notes. I know some people will say, "anonymity, witness protection, etc." but it makes it impossible to verify these accounts. Then, when you look at Stringfield's background, you see that he is yet another ex-intelligence agent who is spreading stories of crashed saucers and dead bodies. Adam S.https://www.blogger.com/profile/11934830683869908953noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-82942998271460225912020-06-09T13:58:15.999-07:002020-06-09T13:58:15.999-07:00Well, Sam -
You'd lost that bet because his m...Well, Sam -<br /><br />You'd lost that bet because his mission was to pass along information that he received with the hope that it would trigger other, newer and better information. He was quick to condemn those reports which deserved it, and noted the inconsistencies and inaccuracies in much of the information received.<br /><br />Having met the man, having interviewed him, and looked into his research, it is clear that you misunderstood his motivations and that you're research was biased. So, listen to the program and Don and I will discuss this allegation.KRandlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06333125414889883920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-26621825992615375812020-06-09T12:29:26.290-07:002020-06-09T12:29:26.290-07:00Mr. Sheaffer seems like a nice guy. Still, I noti...Mr. Sheaffer seems like a nice guy. Still, I notice the general apparent lack of preparedness of skeptics. Perhaps Kevin needs to let them know ahead of time the topic(s). I know I would have a hard time coming up with data off the top of my head. But it was somewhat amazing that few if any UFO cases impressed him at all. Its easy to not be impressed if you can come up with an explanation (regardless of its unlikelihood) that involves non-ET causes. Is it really possible that out of the huge set of cases there is nothing that baffles him? I guess even multiple witnesses, radar, film are not enough. Maybe he needs a walking talking ET or a working spacecraft.<br /><br />Can Kevin come up with a list of the best cases and can Bob give his opinion of each?<br /><br />I am sure Levelland is on it. <br /><br />Maybe the following is a worthy addition.<br />"DOPLOC Observations of Reflection Cross Sections of Satellites"<br />https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/259123.pdf<br />It says:<br />"The flexible schedule by which the field stations operated has provided considerable data from known satellites, Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO*s) and meteors. Many satellites and UFO's have been successfully detected and tracked by the DOPLOC technique and their time of crossing, altitude, east-vest position arid effective reflection cross section determined from single pass data from a single receiving station. Crossing time and position data was forwarded to Space Track Control Center for inclusion in their orbital prediction program."<br /><br />"B. Unidentified Flying Objects<br />A number of reflections were received and recorded which could not be correlated with the predicted position of any known satellite. These were termed Unidentified Flying Objects and reproductions of 14 of these reflections are shown In Figures 101 to 114, with a detailed listing in Table 3."Moonmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10293997781090304733noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-35938796895778969252020-06-09T05:29:08.012-07:002020-06-09T05:29:08.012-07:00I am eager to hear about stringfield. One man gett...I am eager to hear about stringfield. One man getting thousands of inforamtion about ufo "crashes" . IF this was a betting contest i would get a loan and bet the loan,my house,my car and my two kidneys(semi-used) on him being a liar. Sad but true. Whatever research i did unto him pointed to all these being bollocks or lies. And before anyone starts an internet fight do some reasearch and lets talk. Imo stringfield would make aesop proudsamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04771660787352302418noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-55074369781045930262020-06-06T10:59:49.025-07:002020-06-06T10:59:49.025-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.William Strathmannhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01641055950393700958noreply@blogger.com