tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post6691554949197737977..comments2024-03-18T16:51:50.688-07:00Comments on A Different Perspective: The Pteranodano and Billy MeierKRandlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06333125414889883920noreply@blogger.comBlogger77125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-16394288233287675732022-04-30T23:47:08.535-07:002022-04-30T23:47:08.535-07:00@KRandle I admire your confidence standing up to t...@KRandle I admire your confidence standing up to these FIGU bullies and exposing Meier for the coward he is with his phony photos and junky films. FIGU has been intimidating it's ex-member for years and sending out illegal e-mails also. I am aware that there was a suicide within FIGU also... This FIGU group seems highly dangerous. The person who committed suicide was an acquaintance of mine, Corey LeffJAYhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15813399265324941274noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-42376512143314565092020-07-11T19:32:43.448-07:002020-07-11T19:32:43.448-07:00Kevin Randle I cannot thank you enough for taking ...Kevin Randle I cannot thank you enough for taking the time to write this post. I recently watched a movie on Amazon: The Silent Revolution of Truth. Anyways when searching more about Billy I found the picture controversy and immediately thought what if he is being falsely discredited? That is where your blog comes in. As I was reading it this section (pasted below) font was noticeably larger than the rest of your story. Check it out on your Blog. Thanks again you are one in a million!<br /><br />During this, dozens of pictures were noted by him, which quite clearly could not have come from the world NEBER [the planet Meier visited in July 1975] and, therefore, had not been taken by ‘Billy,’ about which Quetzal got very angry. It was obvious that false and manipulated pictures had been foisted on BEAM once more by a foreign hand. Many of the pictures had obviously been photographed from a book and were to have been smuggled into BEAM’s photo collection as so-called cuckoo’s eggs.”Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-40483663653066321012020-01-11T15:02:37.028-08:002020-01-11T15:02:37.028-08:00Hello, "Unknown". HOW do you explain the...Hello, "Unknown". HOW do you explain the physics impossible for a swinging, 1-ft model? It would appear you haven't yet seen the so called, "Pendulum UFO film" taken in Hinwil, 1975. The skeptic theory holds no water once it's taken out of isolation.<br /><br />Shapeshifting UFOs are not new<br />1980's photographic equipment would appear primitive for advanced ET intelligence<br />plausible deniability is the most reasonable explanation<br /><br />BTW, no one has ever published any colour or hi-res duplication attempts. The FIGU photos are very poor resolution B&Ws. Makes one wonder what their originals might be hiding. Maybe not as easily duplicated as claimed.<br /><br />Any thoughts, "Unknown"?Tarohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12120090864259970680noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-29147376851119486112020-01-11T12:36:58.156-08:002020-01-11T12:36:58.156-08:00All that's been "discovered" here is...All that's been "discovered" here is that the same, disgruntled, angry and delusional skeptic (who goes under various names like Edward Fisher, TerraRubicon, etc.) is trying to sell a bunch of bunk.<br /><br />You'll find the far more detailed and accurate, lengthy analysis here:<br /><br />http://www.theyfly.com/sites/default/files/ESinvestig3NovV2.pdf<br /><br />...which also corresponds to what I was told, years ago, by a movie and special effect expert that refuted David Biedney's false claims as well.<br /><br />Don't worry, all of this academic. Just watch as Meier's prophetic and predictive information...CONTINUES to unfold and be corroborated. <br /><br />The poor, angry and disgruntled naysayers will soon recognize that they have a LOT more to be concerned about, since they've ignored the warnings and focused on attacking the man who merely wanted help them prepare for what's now...inevitable.Michael Hornhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11924328600909800227noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-51967664885497855822020-01-11T03:37:37.489-08:002020-01-11T03:37:37.489-08:00Here a interesting article by a man who seemms to ...Here a interesting article by a man who seemms to be quite aware what a trickster Billy Meier is. He discovered that Meier's so called 'Energy Ships' is just a street lantern Meier photographed and used multiples in a row to create the elongated shape.<br /><br />Once the contrast is lowered one can clearly see the outline of the lantern and when the contrast is raised the poles under them become visible. You can even count them and see how mamy multiples Meier uaed. Even ex FiGU members re-created the method.<br /><br />Read all about it here:<br /><br />billymeieruforesearch.com/photos-and-videos/energy-ship-ufo-photos-part-1/Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10604498151201342427noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-1134564412849742842020-01-01T19:41:21.087-08:002020-01-01T19:41:21.087-08:00Well, it's been over 2 years now.
From Augus...Well, it's been over 2 years now. <br /><br />From August 5, 2017 at 6:14 PM:<br /><br />"Kevin/Mahesh,<br /><br />In one comment, please can you explain how Meier hoaxed the following in 1964?<br /><br />http://www.theyfly.com/india-1964"<br /><br />Any chance of you demonstrating that you have actually researched this evidence any year soon?Matt Knighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10998697590235701299noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-82071698856141646542020-01-01T17:22:38.781-08:002020-01-01T17:22:38.781-08:00There is nothing that has been promoted as proof o...There is nothing that has been promoted as proof of hoax that cannot be explained by plausible deniability. However, there are numerous instances that cannot be explained by any hoax theory. So, what other explanation is left? Extraterrestrial involvement. Process of elimination. A logical process.Tarohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12120090864259970680noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-16579531116928605462020-01-01T17:21:22.636-08:002020-01-01T17:21:22.636-08:00Not sure why my original comment was slashed but l...Not sure why my original comment was slashed but let's give this a try: FYI to all following this thread, "Jeremy Smiles" is actually Silvio Santini: https://theyflyblog.com/2017/07/23/threats-from-a-neo-nazi/<br /><br />Better?Tarohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12120090864259970680noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-83307130941073653802020-01-01T09:58:05.366-08:002020-01-01T09:58:05.366-08:00Thanks Kevin and...Happy New Year!
How desperatel...Thanks Kevin and...Happy New Year!<br /><br />How desperately some people try to deny the truth when confronted by it.<br /><br />The analysis by Zahi and Lock confirms what another film and special effects expert told me 14 years ago:<br /><br />https://theyflyblog.com/2014/09/01/energy-ships-report-analysis-prof-rhal-zahi-chris-lock/<br /><br />But the more aptly named Mr. Frowns would do best to start at the beginning and try to explain this:<br /><br />https://www.theyfly.com/india-1964<br /><br />Yes, it’s all rhetorical on my part because we’ve moved far beyond ANY questions about the authenticity of Meier’s UFO photos.<br /><br />As for Meier’s hundreds of examples of specific, impeccably prophetically accurate scientific information, since I can’t post all the corroborating images here I’m sure all of the skeptics will be delighted to know that I’ll be posting images and content from copyrighted, dated, published books with a number of these specific examples as part of our new promotional project this year.<br /><br />If nothing else, the skeptics who post under (numerous) fake screen names will be grateful that their humiliating incompetence, envy, denial and complete and utter failures won’t have their real name face for all the world to see.<br /><br />Watching the convoluted attempts to argue with ironclad, copyright protected information should be a thing of rare beauty. <br />Michael Hornhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11924328600909800227noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-63889516494710166732020-01-01T04:54:38.890-08:002020-01-01T04:54:38.890-08:00All -
I try to keep the discourse here civil. I t...All -<br /><br />I try to keep the discourse here civil. I try not to post comments that are insulting to others who visit. In keeping with that, I had EDITED several of the comments to remove the insults but to allow the other points to be made. If anyone objects to this, well, my blog, my rules. Following are those comments.<br /><br />Taro said...<br />Anyway, "Jeremy Smiles" if that is in fact your real name, you talk big with respect to science. But how much do you REALLY understand? Have you studied it at all? Regardless of the level of open academic "backing", there is BASIC high school science which supports authenticity of the Meier case. Do you have the scientific knowledge to understand it? I've been trying to get a skeptic with some stones to have an OBJECTIVE discussion about Meier's alleged, physics-defying UFO model. No takers. You game? HOW DID MEIER DO IT?<br /><br />By the way, if you don't have any real clue about science, why do you believe you would know how to distinguish pseudo-science from real science? Think about it.<br />December 29, 2019 at 7:08 PM <br /> <br />Jeremy Smiles said...<br />Horn, all you post are unsubstantiated verbal claims and opinions. He said, she said... <br /><br />Lets start with some hard evidence before we continue shall we? Have your guru Billy film some disks landing, the aliens walking out, the cockpit, the instruments...<br />I will be waiting. :))<br />December 29, 2019 at 10:58 PM <br /> <br />Jeremy Smiles said...<br />P.S. Here a interesting article by a man who seemms to be quite aware what a trickster Billy Meier is. He discovered that Meier's so called 'Energy Ships' is just a street lantern Meier photographed and used multiples in a row to create the elongated shape.<br /><br />Once the contrast is lowered one can clearly see the outline of the lantern and when the contrast is raised the poles under them become visible. You can even count them and see how mamy multiples Meier uaed. Even ex FiGU members re-created the method.<br /><br />Read all about it here:<br /><br />billymeieruforesearch.com/photos-and-videos/energy-ship-ufo-photos-part-1/<br /><br />Enjoy 😊<br />KRandlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06333125414889883920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-32240599605139514022019-12-29T14:34:31.821-08:002019-12-29T14:34:31.821-08:00More for the know-it-alls who dabble in things far...More for the know-it-alls who dabble in things far above their understanding:<br /><br />From the Depths of Outer Space<br /><br />https://theyflyblog.com/2019/12/29/from-the-depths-of-outer-space/<br /><br />Billy Meier’s warnings about Apophis preempted NASA by...23 yearsMichael Hornhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11924328600909800227noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-86780983045995855082019-12-29T12:19:01.410-08:002019-12-29T12:19:01.410-08:00Well, here we have another, weak "appeal to a...Well, here we have another, weak "appeal to authority" by someone who hasn't learned how to research and...THINK for themselves.<br /><br />ALL claims, including the ones once considered "extraordinary" - like the earth revolving around the sun once was - ONLY require the application of the scientific method, with rational, objective and logical thinking in order to determine their truthfulness...unlike what the parrots of ill thought out, banal, clichés unthinkingly repeat. <br /><br />Yes, of course original negatives were analyzed, and what doesn't matter is incompetent research.<br /><br />But since you want some authorities to encourage you, try: <br /><br />http://theyfly.com/Scientific_Experts.html<br />https://theyflyblog.com/2017/08/18/billy-meier-beyond-reasonable-doubt/<br />https://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/05/prweb11867883.htm<br /><br />Since the writer is is obviously ignorant of real science, I'll post a few links for their education, such as those at, and linked from:<br /><br />http://www.theyfly.com/corroboration-evidence<br /><br />I know that dopes who write their infantile critiques DON'T understand the significance of copyrights, etc.; they're waiting for Meier's - non-existent - "peers" to review his information.<br /><br />In the meantime, anyone with even half a brain can vet the following:<br /><br />https://theyflyblog.com/2019/05/21/reference-page-for-nasa-discoveries-confirm-ufo-case-real/<br /><br />...and the rest here:<br /><br />https://theyflyblog.com/2019/11/25/the-billy-meier-ufo-contacts-evidence-reference-guide/<br /><br />And what will happen when this pompous clown does this simple little experiment:<br /><br />https://theyflyblog.com/2014/06/15/billy-meier-ufo-case-prove/<br /><br />...that in order to refute requires them to debunk themselves?<br /><br />Oh, if only the day will come when we can have a nice, live, PUBLIC debate with all the desperate naysayers. But then again, they wouldn't be able to get past the evidence here:<br /><br />https://theyflyblog.com/2019/11/25/the-billy-meier-ufo-contacts-evidence-reference-guide/<br /><br />The only things that are "supernatural and miraculous" are the depths of confusion that wannabes and pseudoscientists go to in order to desperately try to deny the plain, easily verified truth.<br />Michael Hornhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11924328600909800227noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-30665497971139674692019-12-28T08:01:08.828-08:002019-12-28T08:01:08.828-08:00Where are the scientific reports, signed by the re...Where are the scientific reports, signed by the relevant experts on company letterhead? None exist. <br />Where is the peer-reviewed analysis? None exist. Is the evidence original? No, Meier's originals were NEVER presented for analysis. Only 3rd generation prints. <br /><br />All there is are totally unverifiable verbal opinions and assumptions from pseudo-scientists, hacks (Dilettoso, Vogel) and a convicted pedophile named Wendell Stevens.<br /><br />Without addressing any single one of them, any "pro-" arguments are nothing but pseudo-scientific verbal claims, which will be ignored by REAL experts, investigators and scientists - which is EXACTLY what has happened with the Meier case. But people who are either gullible or have no proper knowledge of how REAL science works like Meier's followers fail to understand the reason behind the world ignoring the Meier case with its various crackpot theories and unsubstantiated, childish excuses (Man In Black switching photos, erasing memories of a tree, 22+ attempts on Meier's life etc.)<br /><br />The Meier followers will not even acknowledge that extraordinary claims DO require extraordinary evidence AND because Meier's case is a "controversial UFO case" more so! It is NOT incumbent upon the people (skeptic) to DISPROVE extraordinary claims of supernatural beings (ET's) doing miraculous, magical activities and contacting a secluded living farmer, it is INCUMBENT upon the person making those claims to prove their contentions.<br /><br />What I am (and many others) bringing forth in my objections is a common sense perspective, a real scientific evaluation based on what we do have and NOT what we might have or what may be, or what Meier said or the 'Plejahren' said...My burden of proof should not be greater as Meier and his minions making claims of supernatural and miraculous beings (ET's) visiting and contacting Meier. Because Meier's minions, and especially Michael Horn, are ignoring and twisting this important process of evaluating a 'supernatural case' no serious, logical and sane human being will EVER take them serious.<br /><br />Actually nothing what Horn, Taro or Meier's minions say matters. The sooner they realize that, the sooner they might be able to avoid reaching the end of their life only to discover that they have accomplished absolutely nothing. So - they write a few comments and the few gullible followers read it and nod their heads. So what? That doesn't change the fact that they are still nobodies, and are still wasting their life promoting a fraud.Jeremy Smileshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14642114785186715037noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-28942887278022679832019-12-24T13:08:07.071-08:002019-12-24T13:08:07.071-08:00And yet again you, the aviator, steer well clear o...And yet again you, the aviator, steer well clear of a specific discussion on UFO motion. That tells every thinker here about the value of your opinions.Tarohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12120090864259970680noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-62460952233514477072019-12-24T12:23:03.342-08:002019-12-24T12:23:03.342-08:00I wasn't going to dip back into this but your ...I wasn't going to dip back into this but your "so-called insiders" are obviously just that, VERY "so-called"..<br /><br />Here are the easily verifiable FACTS: <br /><br />Over 250 specific examples of prophetically accurate scientific, environmental and geo-political information.<br /><br />My own face-to-face with a current Mars scientist who couldn't explain how Meier published information about Mars not only well BEFORE "official discovery" but also some that was STILL unknown to this scientist.<br /><br />You can get away with statements such as yours with people in the "UFO community" because they know nothing. But it doesn't fly with me because I've done what you haven't...40 years of actual research into the still ongoing contacts. Too bad you bothered with the know-nothings instead of actually investigating and researching yourself, going on-site, talking to the principals, etc. <br /><br />What you do is armchair "research" at best. That's fine but don't think for minute that it has a shred of real relevance.<br /><br />See also:<br /><br />https://theyflyblog.com/2019/05/21/reference-page-for-nasa-discoveries-confirm-ufo-case-real/Michael Hornhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11924328600909800227noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-44313815387273433262019-12-24T11:40:34.221-08:002019-12-24T11:40:34.221-08:00Taro -
Your assumption is inaccurate. Following t...Taro -<br /><br />Your assumption is inaccurate. Following traditional research methods, I, of course, made a survey of what had been previously published whether it in a printed form in books and magazines or on a website and blog. I looked at both pro and con sites, and then attempted to validate the information on those sites through additional research. What was accurate and could be considered unbiased, and was was inaccurate and totally biased. But what you don't know is that I have discussed all of this from some so-called insiders who provided information that was not completely supportive of some of Meier's claims... and, I found a misrepresentation of the accuracy of the predictions, for example, by a manipulation of the information flow. In other words, predictions evolved over time as new information was presented rendering the earlier predictions inaccurate.<br /><br />So, I have not relied on others' research to form my opinions on the credibility of the Meier experience... And, while I revisit this periodically to learn if something new and relevant has been found, there is nothing that has been said to alter my opinion...<br /><br />So, in that case, adios, muchacho. KRandlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06333125414889883920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-56350464673414427092019-12-23T18:56:23.711-08:002019-12-23T18:56:23.711-08:00No Kevin, I expected you not to. As I do this one....No Kevin, I expected you not to. As I do this one. <br /><br />There are NO relevant postings about the topic of my original comment. You've come to your conclusions about Meier through OTHERS' research. I was asking for YOUR thoughts on Meier's UFO movements. After all, we both have an aviation background and mistakenly thought you could appreciate the inconsistency of movement with the suspended model theory. <br /><br />But true UFO analysis requires thinkers not followers, Kevin. And some basic high school physics couldn't hurt either. Meier's UFO movements defy the physics of a swinging model, period. No skeptic has ever been able to duplicate critical movements, movements that cannot be duplicated with a simple suspended model. It's not possible.<br /><br />The Meier case was designed by the ET's to ride the line between appearing real and appearing hoax. It was intentional. This is the conclusion many thinkers who follow the Meier case have come to. Which means the many things you, or rather the people whose research you rely on, have cited as "proof of hoax" was deliberate to ensure the case remains controversial for as long as it needs to be. Which in my opinion is when the world is dominated by thinkers. Which will not be in my lifetime. This one, anyway.<br /><br />I think what you really fear is seeing something you won't be able to explain and then appearing the fool for declaring hoax too quickly. For example, the smooth and precise 270º turn, beginning and ending on straight line paths. The evidence is hidden away for only the thinkers to see. If you're not a thinker, Kevin, I have no more time to waste on your blog. Have a Merry Christmas.Tarohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12120090864259970680noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-50270750459195812422019-12-23T08:47:11.535-08:002019-12-23T08:47:11.535-08:00Taro -
Did you really expect me to post the negat...Taro -<br /><br />Did you really expect me to post the negative, insulting, snotty and mean spirited comments? I have said, repeatedly on this blog that I'm open to a difference of opinion and don't mind the criticism if it is offered in a constructive way. But I also expect you to take the time to read the relevant postings about the topic so that I'm not required to repeat myself. All you need to do is type Billy Meier into the search engine provided and it will bring up those postings. I will also note that I had Michael Horn on my radio show/podcast to discuss some of this. And with that, I again, disengage.KRandlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06333125414889883920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-7429432986234530812019-12-21T01:04:08.218-08:002019-12-21T01:04:08.218-08:00One last thing, Kevin.
Just remember, YOU chose t...One last thing, Kevin.<br /><br />Just remember, YOU chose to get involved with a controversy. And controversies always have two points of view. When you choose to suppress one view you are no better than a dictator. In other words, it's a douche move. You and I both know your reason for blocking my comments is completely bogus. There is no repetition. You've never commented on Meier's UFO evidence. One can only conclude your familiarity with it is equally scarce. How can you come to an objective conclusion about a UFO case when you know next to nothing about said UFOs? If I were you, I would be ashamed to call myself a UFOlogist. But that's just me.Tarohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12120090864259970680noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-50600338665794733592019-12-19T18:36:22.282-08:002019-12-19T18:36:22.282-08:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Michael Hornhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11924328600909800227noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-54425356955721614852019-12-19T17:56:20.304-08:002019-12-19T17:56:20.304-08:00I do not wish to engage in a repetition of the arg...I do not wish to engage in a repetition of the arguments that we have already had and by that I mean other blog postings that covered some of these points. I have important things to do.KRandlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06333125414889883920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-29733062436668117872019-12-19T10:41:41.747-08:002019-12-19T10:41:41.747-08:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Michael Hornhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11924328600909800227noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-3483923336423966112019-12-19T10:14:01.265-08:002019-12-19T10:14:01.265-08:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Tarohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12120090864259970680noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-89186186342903243992019-12-19T09:24:51.612-08:002019-12-19T09:24:51.612-08:00Taro -
Please read Michael Horn's comment abo...Taro -<br /><br />Please read Michael Horn's comment above yours. I think it explains the situation. That yours follow his in the queue does not mean my comment was directed at you... but, seems that while you deny name calling, you then make a reference about self-delusion. I think you impeached your own response...<br /><br />And it didn't take two tries, it's just that I sometimes have over obligations, which means, patience is a virtue. It sometimes takes time to get to through the comments, especially those to a posting that is a couple of years old.<br /><br />But let's get a couple of things straight. I am under no obligation to respond to all the comments, especially when I would be force to repeat arguments made earlier that seem to have fallen on deaf ears. Regardless of what you and your pals think, I have looked at the Meier material and found it wanting. Some 200 photographs that were proven to be faked (oh, I forgot, the MIB replaced the real photos with fakes to make Meier look bad), claims of predictions that predated anything found in science, except of course, I found a number of instances in which the information was published prior to Meier's claims (oh, I forgot, he couldn't have possibly seen those references so it doesn't count) and predictions made at one point only to be found wanting when new information was found showing them to be wrong.<br /><br />I would have thought you and your pals might want to comment on the emissary for the Pleiades... I wondered if all those from the Pleiades were in communication with one another and why a new emissary has been designated but apparently you don't wish to comment on this newer post.<br /><br />I sometimes refuse to engage simply because it is a big waste of time and I have other things to do... football comes to mind now that Game of Thrones had ended its run... and of course, I find nothing of interest with the Meier fantasy and no real evidence to support his claims regardless of how much foot stomping and outrage is directed at those who hold a different perspective (I really couldn't resist the opportunity to point to the purpose of the blog). KRandlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06333125414889883920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-87144382995525797612019-12-18T15:38:54.018-08:002019-12-18T15:38:54.018-08:00Oh, is that why it took me TWO tries to get that l...Oh, is that why it took me TWO tries to get that last comment approved? Just for fun, let's examine the facts: I never called you any name other than Dr. Randle. Although speaking generally, I did however IMPLY self-delusion regarding your expertise on UFOs. It's really up to your readers to decide for themselves. I was perfectly happy to let my two-year old comment to you concerning Meier's UFO movements and your complete lack of acknowledgement speak for themselves. IMHO, anyone who claims to be an expert on UFOs but ignores the examination of UFO movement or other physical evidence is self-delusional, forgive my harshness.<br /><br />And yes, I have looked into the mirror. I continually question my conclusions and allow the skeptic to try to convince me that their approach is more objective than mine. That's what my comment from two-years ago was. You're still welcome to try. And by the way, if you're too shy to post WELL-REASONED comments on your blog, I know a guy who will. As they say, if you can't handle the heat, stay outta the kitchen. Just saying...Tarohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12120090864259970680noreply@blogger.com