tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post7098974443802742668..comments2024-03-19T11:13:40.642-07:00Comments on A Different Perspective: X-Zone Broadcast Network - Robert Sheaffer and UnidentifiedKRandlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06333125414889883920noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-57856295838637253052019-07-19T13:48:51.741-07:002019-07-19T13:48:51.741-07:00Hi,
I consider myself a sceptic and I have been s...Hi, <br />I consider myself a sceptic and I have been so in Ufology for more than 40 years. Answering your question I have come across some cases I cannot explain. One of those few is a CE3 none the less! It is one neither I, nor its main investigator & my friend V-J Ballester Olmos have solved. You can read it all here (in Spanish, sorry):<br /><br />http://www.webcitation.org/6mx6wDd3k<br /><br />On the other hand, I do not believe there is an extraterrestrial answer to it.Luis R. Gonzálezhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04503602371865230235noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-33503399241575667762019-07-14T16:44:35.633-07:002019-07-14T16:44:35.633-07:00Any scientific endeavor benefits from skepticism. ...Any scientific endeavor benefits from skepticism. Without it a person (or persons) can claim anything they want and claim it is true including all the lies and con jobs they make up to scam people.<br /><br />Evidence is evidence. Proof is proof. If you don’t like skepticism then find another hobby to pursue other than ufology.<br /><br />And for the record, the kind of nonsense broadcast at the end of the last episode of “Unidentified” is a good example of why skepticism benefits ufology.<br /><br />The Italian helicopter case is a known hoax, but believers worldwide now claim it “real” because Elizondo and DeLonge say it is.....Brian Bhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04201018843054563257noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-64910504929599598362019-07-14T01:11:30.217-07:002019-07-14T01:11:30.217-07:00@Matt
Debunkers/dogmatic skeptics is their proper...@Matt<br /><br />Debunkers/dogmatic skeptics is their proper name.<br />They don't get it, but in reality they're the flip side of those gullible folks from the UFO community, albeit far more arrogant and with a snobby, educated image.<br /><br />https://imgur.com/oRLbHxQUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18277643612639604293noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-34833663039372166402019-07-12T17:52:13.347-07:002019-07-12T17:52:13.347-07:00Thanks Dr Randle
Look forward to hearing an updat...Thanks Dr Randle<br /><br />Look forward to hearing an update about Roswell and what your colleagues have been up to...<br /><br />Regards<br />NitramNitramhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09658903255370299035noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-1295438113070748132019-07-12T14:23:22.649-07:002019-07-12T14:23:22.649-07:00Are you aware that your Roswell shows have already...Are you aware that your Roswell shows have already been published in Itunes?Moonmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10293997781090304733noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-39169867217977649552019-07-11T22:21:24.647-07:002019-07-11T22:21:24.647-07:00Kevin, a problem with many skeptics is that they c...Kevin, a problem with many skeptics is that they come across as what the late Stanton Friedman called "Nasty negativists." These folks have three qualities in common: 1) "Don't bother me with facts, my mind is made up." 2) Attack the witnesses, not the data. 3) "It can't be, therefore it isn't." Just as blind faith that all UFOs are ETs does not do the UFO community any favors, blind skepticism-such as issuing explanations without looking at information presented or talking to the witnesses, or flat out refusing to consider other possible explanations other than the one given, doesn't do the skeptics any favors, either. Matt Wiserhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07849512258519428584noreply@blogger.com