tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post6317296797264660015..comments2024-03-19T11:13:40.642-07:00Comments on A Different Perspective: Death of a DreamKRandlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06333125414889883920noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-38626893532971108302013-11-14T18:12:14.710-08:002013-11-14T18:12:14.710-08:00Hello Kevin Randle!
What do you think about the R...Hello Kevin Randle!<br /><br />What do you think about the Roswell Slides, are they real?<br /><br />What do you think about this photo of a possible Roswell EBE:<br /><br />http://static.ddmcdn.com/gif/ufo-roswell-121a.jpg<br /><br />Source: http://science.howstuffworks.com/space/aliens-ufos/history-roswell-incident2.htm<br /><br /><br />Note: Note: But this is not the Marina Popowich Puppet from Montreal, Kanada - Photos: http://www.universonline.it/_misteri...i/00_03_17.php and http://www.slimeworld.org/strange/graphics/alien21.jpg<br /><br />Its similar but look at the differences at the mouth and the right eye (on "my" photo the eye on the left side) It seems as if were the eye damaged on "my" photo.<br /><br /><br />Best regards from Germany, Michael!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-73385596689451564912013-10-09T09:35:54.375-07:002013-10-09T09:35:54.375-07:00Nitram -
Yes, the unfortunate collateral damage h...Nitram -<br /><br />Yes, the unfortunate collateral damage here is Don. Yes, he made some mistakes 20 years ago but he learned from those mistakes. These really shouldn't be an issue, especially to someone "outside" of the UFO field. One of the big regrets here is that all this has probably damaged beyond repair my friendship with Don... because someone else got a bee in his bonnet. And yes, I suppose I need to brace myself for another round of attacks.KRandlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06333125414889883920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-35721515284740572752013-10-09T02:07:02.630-07:002013-10-09T02:07:02.630-07:00Here's my take so far on the controversy:
htt...Here's my take so far on the controversy:<br /><br />http://xrayer.blogspot.com/2013/10/kimball-empties-roswell-saucer.html<br /><br />Comments are welcome.Ray Palm (Ray X)https://www.blogger.com/profile/01600471069648853966noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-73487988567429732642013-10-08T12:47:07.057-07:002013-10-08T12:47:07.057-07:00Kevin
You made a mistake, you treated Paul Kimbal...Kevin<br /><br />You made a mistake, you treated Paul Kimball as an honorable man.<br /><br />That said, I do feel for Don Schmitt who I hardly know - he made a mistake, or two, twenty years ago and still continues to suffer for it.<br /><br />Regards<br />NitramNitramhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09658903255370299035noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-42733347455116784002013-10-08T01:30:24.125-07:002013-10-08T01:30:24.125-07:00After some pointed remarks I made over at Kimball&...After some pointed remarks I made over at Kimball's blog, he decided to take his ball and go home. Either he banned me personally in a fit of pique, or he closed the blog to all but devotees.<br /><br />I don't know much about the controversy surrounding Schmitt's background. If he misrepresented himself in the past, I can understand why some like Kimball would be disgusted, though Schmitt would hardly be the first to do this.<br /><br />I can also see how Randle's public statements are guilty of 'shading' (to use Kimball's term) to the extent that he's walking a tightrope, trying to prevent or repair damage to friendship with Carey, maybe also head off problems with somebody's NDA somewhere being potentially violated.<br /><br />All this aside, however, it's on its face a shady move to release excerpts from private e-mails without a compelling and demonstrable public interest. And as Randle says in his blog post: Who the hell is Paul Kimball?<br /><br />My beef is not with someone deciding to act in the public interest. If all we do is go around challenging whether somebody has the right, it'll never be done. My problem is with people like Kimball specifically, but a few others as well, who entertain notions that they are not a part of UFOlogy, that they are above the sordid controversies belonging to it -- all the while acting to create and perpetuate those controversies.<br /><br />Let's take Kimball's theory on the whole thing to be true for a moment just to ask whether his behavior in consequence was valid. Let's say that because Schmitt misrepresented himself in the past, nothing he is associated with has any credibility. Let's say Schmitt and/or Carey is at fault for telling tales out of school to Randle on the slides. Let's say Randle is guilty of being a chatty Susan and telling his own tangential tale to Kimball. Is the proper response of someone who has 'nothing to do' with UFOlogy and its many controversies to pass directly to releasing private e-mails to the public concerning it? Is the logical first move of someone really and truly disgusted with the controversies of UFOlogy to move as hastily as he can to create one of those controveries?<br /><br />I would say 'no'. I'd think somebody really averse to UFO melodrama would have stayed away from it. Especially since it's really a private matter between Schmitt/Carey and their source, alternately between Randle and Schmitt/Carey. If Randle is a little cagey in public statements, and if Schmitt and Carey are as well, given there may have been an NDA, where's the great public duty to go on a truth jihad and print private e-mails? Where's the compelling public interest?<br /><br />Instead, there's compelling personal interest. Some of these guys like Kimball entertain the false notion that they're above the lunatic in-fighting of UFOlogy; that they're truth-telling iconoclasts above the fray. Yet all the while they're in denial and an integral part of it. It's like the guy who beats his wife and all the while tells himself he's a good husband. It's more of the same old joke.Lord Jimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16136450423776432401noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-88671460976037996132013-10-07T10:56:28.284-07:002013-10-07T10:56:28.284-07:00Peyton Place. Peyton Place. Arcturushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15465788205525639425noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-51156271757458524032013-10-06T13:59:42.083-07:002013-10-06T13:59:42.083-07:00Kevin - So now Kimball has 'punished' you ...Kevin - So now Kimball has 'punished' you by carrying through as he threatened to do - he quickly released another of your private emails to him because you dared to explain yourself and comment on the brouhaha. It's his way of attempted blackmail and control.<br /><br />Maybe you didn't notice Kimball's typical m.o. over the past decade or so since he came on the ufology scene, riding on his uncle-in-law Stan Freidman's coattails. <br /><br />Though sinking to an all-time low of publishing two private emails, this still does follows form for Kimball. He's trying to showcase himself as the man who did the right thing and expose whatever it is he think's he exposed in order to position himself as the 'good guy', the 'savior'. <br /><br />The bottom line is if there's nothing in it for Kimball, he'll marginalize the person or subject or, in this case, try to destroy it for those it means something to - as here with the Dream-Team Roswell investigation.<br /><br />Remember that old adage about the scorpion and the frog? That applies to Kimball. He can't help himself because of his nature.oh_maronehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08927616545041211733noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-9509381369257892882013-10-06T05:39:22.081-07:002013-10-06T05:39:22.081-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Steve Sawyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17716314515943305158noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-55395526012969135122013-10-05T14:56:59.029-07:002013-10-05T14:56:59.029-07:00At this point in time, if there are people out the...At this point in time, if there are people out there with actual evidence related to Roswell, wouldn't they go to a good and reliable news organization? This is a story just about every person on the planet knows about so after awhile witnesses, etc., to this matter would have figured out that simple little fact regarding "notoriety" of the subject. If there were actual photos of an alien or two from that event, what sense is there in bringing them to UFO investigators? Just doesn't make sense.Mikehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15259151459827690096noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-37167745658705170082013-10-05T13:58:50.660-07:002013-10-05T13:58:50.660-07:00Many people will continue to admire and laud Paul ...Many people will continue to admire and laud Paul Kimball for his astute energy on behalf of the truth.<br /><br />Josh S.RRRGrouphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04875523970644487204noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-72142444638260266112013-10-05T12:28:16.977-07:002013-10-05T12:28:16.977-07:00In a word, Mr. Kimball was 'wrong.' Under...In a word, Mr. Kimball was 'wrong.' Under his reasoning, he should be shunned. However, I think most people -- including myself -- will accommodate Mr. Kimball's numerous offenses and continue to accept his positive contributions. On the other hand, how many people will trust Mr. Kimball with a confidence in the future?Lou Sheehanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07412010077098388477noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-13699450089436525842013-10-04T08:38:53.083-07:002013-10-04T08:38:53.083-07:00CDA -
Really?
After the turmoil of the last week...CDA -<br /><br />Really?<br /><br />After the turmoil of the last week you think I'm dumb enough to comment?<br /><br />Any questions about the content of that book should be addressed to Tom or Don.KRandlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06333125414889883920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-49277096059301906692013-10-04T06:55:56.661-07:002013-10-04T06:55:56.661-07:00Tell us please: Was it wise for two members of yo...Tell us please: Was it wise for two members of your team, Carey & Schmitt, to write another Roswell book during the period you were all supposedly doing your investigations into the 'final word 'on the affair? Couldn't they have held back?<br /><br />Or don't you think it matters?cdahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01005702597775594084noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-85223711311084544602013-10-04T03:39:20.041-07:002013-10-04T03:39:20.041-07:00And now, here is Paul Kimball's reaction:
htt...And now, here is Paul Kimball's reaction:<br /><br />http://redstarfilms.blogspot.ca/2013/10/death-of-dream-by-self-inflicted-wounds.htmlSteve Sawyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17716314515943305158noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-31481954995507843212013-10-03T23:53:42.034-07:002013-10-03T23:53:42.034-07:00Well said, Sir!
...anyone who denies the roughly ...Well said, Sir!<br /><br />...anyone who denies the roughly two decades of hard work and perseverance that the coalition of Randel, Schmit and Carey have demonstrated simply doesn't understand how the investigation developed.<br /><br />...YET... somehow two bloviating egoists were added to your team, and became the sole reason for all criticisms directed at your joint efforts. <br /><br />(How to fix it all is above my Pay Grade...)Kurt Petershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09217079871185958463noreply@blogger.com