tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post7150231815203715778..comments2024-03-19T11:13:40.642-07:00Comments on A Different Perspective: Coast to Coast: UAPs and a Couple of Current ReportsKRandlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06333125414889883920noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-87608909784354562852021-07-15T13:43:35.579-07:002021-07-15T13:43:35.579-07:00Olden...“The UFO Evidence” provides a brief list o...Olden...<i>“The UFO Evidence” provides a brief list of alleged ufo occupant sightings, including the June 27,1959 New Guinea sighting by the late Father Gill,...</i><br /><br />Thanks for reminding me of this incident.<br />Absolutely fascinating case that seems to be rarely discussed.Paul Younghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04267452625547760508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-13221389259941810012021-07-13T06:32:53.732-07:002021-07-13T06:32:53.732-07:00I think Louis Nicholson’s suggestion that you prov...I think Louis Nicholson’s suggestion that you provide copies of your books to the members of the Senate Intelligence Committee is a terrific idea. The late, great Major Donald E. Keyhoe employed this same tactic, when he sent copies of NICAP’s extensive unidentified flying object report, “The UFO Evidence,” to all members of the US Congress in 1964.<br /><br />Section 13 of “The UFO Evidence,” on Congress and the UFOs, reads like a who’s who of American politics with comments from such renowned members of the US Senate as Barry Goldwater, Stuart Symington, Thomas Dodd, Estes Kefauver, Harrison Williams, Jacob Javits, Kenneth Keating, William Proxmire and Birch Bayh.<br /><br />The report itself, which was written by the late Richard H. Hall, provides a cross-section of ufo reports, a history and analysis of the US Air Force’s investigation of ufos, reports of ufo sightings by members of the US Army, Navy and Marine Corps, reports of ufo sightings by scientists and engineers, and special evidence cases, involving electro-magnetic effects, radar cases, photographic cases (including the still unresolved Tremonton, Utah film of 1952 for Martin Willis’ review), physical and physiological effects, sound, and the so-called Angel’s Hair ufo incidents (remember those?).<br /><br />“The UFO Evidence” provides a brief list of alleged ufo occupant sightings, including the June 27,1959 New Guinea sighting by the late Father Gill, the July 13,1959 New Zealand sighting by Mrs. Frederick Moreland and the famous September 20, 1961 New Hampshire, US sighting by the late Mr. and Mrs. Barney Hill (although there is no mention of the Hills’ subsequent alleged abduction). I understand that Mr. Hall’s “The UFO Evidence, Volume Two,” which was published many years later, contains an extensive section on alleged ufo landings, ufo landings with occupants and physical trace cases.<br /><br />Heck, if the members of the US Senate Intelligence Committee want to read this superb report, I’ll even lend them my dog-eared, 57-year-old copy of “The UFO Evidence” if it will do any good.Oldenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00078463397041715544noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-16401494591530053452021-07-11T14:22:36.914-07:002021-07-11T14:22:36.914-07:00Kevin,
You wrote: "Through binoculars, the wi...Kevin,<br />You wrote: "Through binoculars, the witness saw the disk had a row of windows on the side and that it didn’t appear to be rotating." This is important information. Yes the craft are not spinning; they're like being at the "eye of the hurricane. The force that propels the craft, surrounds the craft. That spin is controlled by the craft. <br />Ed L. Barkerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10128768251635637893noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-51821364416380412412021-07-09T20:51:40.868-07:002021-07-09T20:51:40.868-07:00Good Morning, Kevin.
I am not focused on making m...Good Morning, Kevin.<br /><br />I am not focused on making money. I have gathered a large database of “truth”, that clearly reveals the Army General Staff, if no one else, took the Flying Disc reports of late 1947 and the early fifties, very seriously!<br /><br />But...we are now at a crossroads, historically speaking. If pressed one would have to admit that the Navy has been trying to get this information out to the “public” for a long time. The last reference, in the project: Blue Book files, was a Navy Commander, who was, I think, in charge of the Armed Forces radio network, and he was quoted with fuming exhortations against the Air Force, and their (so-called) UFO investigations.<br /><br />Many times, we can see that the Navy was trying to intervein, to press the Air Force. Each time it has failed. Well, apparently…not this time!!!<br /><br />So, 144 cases or 7 cases, they said what needed to be said. There is, definitely, more to come, I am certain. It boils down to us trusting that the Navy knows, and it cares. They have “cared” for a long time. And its about time!<br />Bob Kofordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04011405404835724736noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-54544748618218217912021-07-09T07:45:15.779-07:002021-07-09T07:45:15.779-07:00Well, I can believe the report was done by two peo...Well, I can believe the report was done by two people on a part time basis. When Congress demands these special reports there is no reduction in workload in other areas. People are not relieved of some of their other responsibilities in order to do the extra work. During the height of the Vietnam War Congress typically required DoD to proved about 50 special reports - over and above the usual required extensive reporting to Congress. While I was at the Pentagon, 1988 to 1993, Congress required the DoD to provide about 500 special reports each fiscal year. Yet another report is no big whoop. <br /><br />I had some kind of special report to provide almost every year I was there. One year they instructed us to provide a plan to upgrade a certain university's facilities. My response was a short letter, "We have no plan because we have no requirements to do so." Of course their not-at-all-subtle message was, "The ranking Republican on the Appropriations Committee wants his favorite school to receive $30M worth of new facilities from the USAF. And he does not want to labeled as Pork." I refused to play their game, which we later found out was illegal, anyway.<br /><br />So, I do not know what was the real intent of requiring the report but it represents an approach that is doomed to fail. It probably would have been best for Congress to request an official position from the DoD on whether the recent sightings by military pilots constituted (1) A clear and present danger to National Security, (2) A hazard to military operations, (3) Evidence of areas of technology that should be exploited for National Defense Purposes, (4) A matter of scientific interest on a continuing basis.<br /><br />That would have formed a basis for actual action by the various Appropriations and Authorization Committees in the Congress rather than just yet another Cable TV Special. <br /><br /> <br /> RWEhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08060301488401028744noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11558306.post-30364623164498252622021-07-09T05:18:35.640-07:002021-07-09T05:18:35.640-07:00Kevin, perhaps you should send a copy of one of mo...Kevin, perhaps you should send a copy of one of more of your books to the Senate Intelligence Committee to give them the historical information you so strongly believe they should have. You could also mention those new sightings. You never know, they may be extremely grateful for the information. Maybe registered UFO lobbyist Steve Bassett could assist in this.Louis Nicholsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08504089634070585120noreply@blogger.com