Turns out that was wrong. Turns out he was inventing stuff for his science articles, or maybe misinterpreting stuff… in any case, we now have to reassess what he wrote in his science articles, including his recent revelations about memory.
I
found his original piece to be interesting… it seemed to fit in with what
Elizabeth Loftus and Richard Ofshe had written in the past. It fit in with the
idea that memory is not the big video camera that had been claimed, but was
more random and sporadic than that. Memory might be untrustworthy and we would
all be well advised to remember that as we interviewed those who had seen a UFO
in years past.
The
arguments can still be made. Those older sources are still reliable, and those
sources that Lehrer used are still good. It means that if we find something
interesting in what he wrote, we’d better see if we could find the primary
source to ensure the accuracy of quote and the information interpreted correctly.
He was no longer someone to be trusted.
As
we move through the UFO field, we all make mistakes. I have been taken to task
for believing the tales of Frank Kaufmann. He spun a good story and he did have
some documentation that backed up what he said. He’d shown some to me but he
wouldn’t let me have copies… that should have been a red flag. Those documents
that could have been checked would have revealed the truth. He did provide
copies of his Separation papers and I had no reason to doubt their
authenticity. Who would alter those?
After
reading Stolen Valor, it turned out
that quite a few people would. I have wondered if anyone checks my military
credentials with St. Louis now that such things are easier. I’m sure they have,
and they found that I was who I said I was… Oh, there are some errors in them. But,
if someone claims a military record, we would all be well advised to check it
from the primary source.
The
point, here however, is that Lehrer has let us all down… We should check out
all that he has said about various topics in science to be sure he was right,
and I suppose go to the primary sources and bypass him. I suppose I believed
what he wrote about memory (which, BTW, still might be accurate) because of
what I had read from Loftus, Ofshe and others. Now, I’ll just go one step
further and look up the primary source to make sure it agrees with what he said
but he won’t be used as a source.
(Blogger's Note: I have just learned that Wired magazine will continue to publish Jonah Lehrer's material. I don't know what vetting process or fact checking they plan to do. I am surprised at this, which just shows nothing around us is ever easy. As for my, if I am ever inclined to use his material as a source again, I will make sure that his information is accurate.)
(Blogger's Note: I have just learned that Wired magazine will continue to publish Jonah Lehrer's material. I don't know what vetting process or fact checking they plan to do. I am surprised at this, which just shows nothing around us is ever easy. As for my, if I am ever inclined to use his material as a source again, I will make sure that his information is accurate.)
Hi, Please don't take this the wrong way but I am not familiar with Jonah Lehrer so a little background info would have been helpful or a link to some additional info so I could have better understood your post. Thanks
ReplyDeleteEnjoy the site.
Lehrer was (is) a science writer, among other things, who was caught making up quotes for his books. It had seemed that his inventions were limited to work other than science writing, but now seems to include that as well.
ReplyDeleteYou can find out more by googling his name. One of the articles can be found here:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/15/jonah-lehrer-keeps-job-wired_n_1778960.html?icid=maing-grid10%7Chtmlws-main-bb%7Cdl14%7Csec3_lnk2%26pLid%3D193069
UPDATE: Wired fired Lehrer.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/08/violations-of-editorial-standards-found-in-wired-writers-blog/