I
see that June Kaba’s tale is making the rounds again and although I hate to
mention it because it will probably result in more hate email; I find her story
to be unbelievable. She seemed to me to be a very nice woman who might have
been lonely in her old age but the stories she told simply do not hang together
and her observations of military life and organization are in error.
June Kaba at a wedding celebration in Ohio. She has her back to the camera on the right. |
I
first learned of her when she contacted me after the Unsolved Mysteries broadcast about Roswell in 1989. Her story was
that she, along with her pals met for coffee every morning before they had to
be at work at 8:00. She wrote, “The scoop was that two little greenish men
(bodies) from a wrecked flying saucer had been flown into the base during the
night and were in a freezer locker in one of the hangers [sic] and that Aero
Med lad had charge of them for examination.”
According
to what she told James Clarkson on June 27, 1997, “It [the flight] came from
New Mexico. He [the airman relating the tale] said what I brought in this
morning… He said that he brought two little men in… He called them little green
men. He described them as greenish-blue and they were four feet tall and they
were dead.”
She
said that it was an airman who had told her the tale and that he “seemed to
know what he was talking about…” Later she would describe him as a master
sergeant who might have been the crew chief on the aircraft.
Less
than two hours later there was a memo “hand carried” to the office and each of
those there were required to read it and then sign it. For the most part it was
a standard security agreement that outlined the penalty for giving those who
had no clearances information that was considered classified. According to
Kaba, “This was the jist [sic] of the memo:
Some
irresponsible person has started a false rumor about 2 green men from [a]
flying saucer. This is nothing but a rumor and has no truth. Anyone repeating
this rumor will be liable for dismissal and will be liable for $20,000 fine or
20 years in jail.
According
to Kaba, this memo was “over the signature of the Laboratory chief.” Later she
would suggest that the order came from a higher authority than the laboratory
chief.
Of
course this makes no sense. If it is a rumor then no law would be violated by
repeating it. The memo does nothing other than reinforce the validity of what
the airman said. The best course of action for those in charge, if they were
worried about anyone repeating the “rumor,” was to caution them verbally. Why
put something like that in writing where it might suddenly appear in the
newspaper? Or that someone might find while searching through correspondence
some years later? It would be of no value in a trial because to try someone for
violating the order, it would have to be produced and that gives out the
information about the bodies and the craft.
Kaba’s
story was originally interesting to me because here was a witness who had been
at Wright Field and offered us some testimony about the bodies arriving there.
True, she saw nothing herself, but the circumstances seemed interesting and I
wanted to follow up on it. Kaba then sent me several documents proving that she
had worked there (or more accurately at Patterson Field and later at
Wright-Patterson AFB) and had a security clearance. No evidence was located
suggesting that she held anything higher than a secret clearance though she
claimed top secret and a “Q” clearance, (according to Clarkson’s interview)
which seemed to be related to the Department of Energy. There seems to be
nothing in her background that would require a DOE “Q” clearance.
Originally,
then, this tale seems related to Roswell, but the documentation doesn’t support
that. It shows that she didn’t work there in July 1947. Her work record was
somewhat spotty. She worked at Patterson Field from July 3, 1942 until June 30,
1943, when she quite to have a baby. Next she worked there from May 13, 1948 to
July 21, 1948 when she left for health reasons. Her final work was from March
8, 1951 to May 2, 1952 when she and her husband moved away from the Dayton,
Ohio, area. This removed her tale from that of Roswell because she had made it
clear that the aircraft had landed the night before. I supposed if you wanted,
you could suggest that this had something to do with the Aztec UFO crash, if
you believe that tale.
In
fact, in the attempts to validate some of Kaba’s information, researchers have
relied on the MJ-12 parade of documents. The suggestion is that the nonsensical
El Indio UFO crash of December 1950 might be one of the three that she meant
when she said she knew of three UFO crashes. Unfortunately (and this we can’t
blame on her because it was speculation by others), it is clear that the El
Indio crash was invented by Robert Willingham in 1968. It was not one of the
three.
For
some reason she was not asked what the three crashes were. Once I learned that
she had not been employed at Patterson Field during July 1947, I put the case
on the back burner. She hadn’t mentioned to me that she knew of three crashes,
only that she had been in Dayton when the airman talked of the bodies arriving
the night before. When it was clear that Roswell couldn’t have been that crash,
and in fact, her dates of employment didn’t lead to any specific case, I wasn’t
sure if there was any significance to her tale.
There
was one other fact, which now that it no longer matters to her, I can mention.
She wrote to me on March 31, 1991, “Although I am classed as legally blind, my
vision is peculiar in that I have so called tunnel vision. I suffered brain
damage as a result of loss of blood.”
This
then, seems to be the tale told by a lonely woman. It seems to be a
confabulation rather than a blatant lie. It is clear from my correspondence
with her that she did have knowledge of UFOs and claimed to have seen three
herself. Given all of this, I had no reason to pursue the investigation. It
seemed to me that it was a dead end and nothing I have learned since has
suggested anything else.
I believe it should be noted for sake of clarity that "June Kaba" is aka "June Crain" (her maiden name), and that according to her interviewer Mr. Clarkson, "her married names were Cubbage and finally Kaba." (source: Preface to Clarkson's 6/27/1997 interview transcript with June Kaba).
ReplyDeleteIs this story really worth relating? I believe the eye condition she is suffering from is known as 'macular degeneration', which affects many people late in life.
ReplyDeleteBut her narrative, as you say, does not really add anything useful to the Roswell affair, does it?
Perhaps she just felt she wanted to talk to someone about bits of her past to strike up a possible companionship or friendship.
cda: Have you read the transcript of her 1997 interview with Mr. Clarkson?
ReplyDeleteJohn -
ReplyDeleteI have read the whole interview by Jim Clarkson. I shared a great deal of information with him that I had gathered in 1990 and 1991. And I say again, June Kaba seemed to be a lonely woman but much of what she said does not track with reality. For example, her discussion about who was actually in charge of an aircraft being an enlisted soldier is in error. While the crew chief was in charge of many things on the aircraft the person in charge was the aircraft commander who was an officer. I don't know where she got the idea that the crew chief would have been in charge when the aircraft was in the error. As I say, I point this out simply because it is completely wrong...
And, as I mentioned, I'm not sure about the validity of corroborating some of her tale by pointing out it agrees with things in the MJ-12 documents... She said she knew of three crashes but we don't really know what three she was talking about, but her story of the bodies arriving in Ohio doesn't track with any such reports given her spotty history of employment. Over the ten years mentioned, she might have had a job a little over two years.
CDA -
I bring this up now because there has been some talk about Kaba's tales in the last couple of days and I wanted to supply... well, a different perspective.
Dr. Randle, I figured you would have performed due diligence with regard to Ms. Kaba (or Ms. Crain as I know of her) -- not sure about some others on here though who are so quick to dismiss ...
ReplyDelete