I was talking with Don
Ecker the other day. He has been involved in UFO research for a long time and
was the Research Director for UFO magazine in the 90s. He also organized
a conference or symposium for Disney that was held in coordination with UFO.
This “UFO Summit” was a first for Disney. It was apparently held to promote
Tomorrowland’s “Alien Encounter” attraction.
Don Ecker
There were two separate
panels of experts invited to the Summit. In the first week were George Knapp,
Zecharia Sitchen, Russ Estes, Vicki Ecker, Vern Marsh, Laurie Angelone, Dawn
Wells and Yvonne Smith. Up for the second week were Don Schmitt, Jesse Marcel,
Jr., Terry Stone, Debbie Steinke, Budd Hopkins, Barry Taff, Cliff Stone, Bruce
Cornet, Stan McDaniel, and William Bramley. It was during the second week that
Disney also arranged for a NASA presentation.
Thinking about this
over the years, Don told me he was bothered by the lack of an audience for the
various panel discussions and wondered if there wasn’t a nefarious reason for
this. He suggested, and it makes sense, that some government agency that wanted
information on what the various UFO researchers knew and the avenues of
investigation they were following, would sponsor just such a symposium. The
participants would be there to answer any questions, provide insight into their
expertise and the direction of their research, and it would all seem to be
benign.
The link here is that
the CIA sponsored Robertson Panel of January 1953 that had suggested a
debunking campaign to defuse interest in UFOs, and suggested that Disney would
be one avenue for that debunking. Someone had to be footing the bill for the
travel expenses, hotel reservations, meals, and other, ancillary expenses at
this symposium. There seemed to be no upside of Disney after the investment of
tens of thousands of dollars. The documentary that came out of all this aired
on TV twice. Once at three in the afternoon and then sometime later, at two or
three in the morning.
Of course, the excuse
here would be that the panels were assembled to promote the Alien Encounters
attraction, but you do have to wonder about the suggestion for that promotion. UFO
devoted a single page to it in their March/April 1995 issue. There was nothing
in the short article to suggest anything important had been revealed in the
various panel discussions and it seems that the promotional aspect of it
failed. There wasn’t any wide spread interest in the attraction and later
reviews suggested it wasn’t a top-notch effort by Disney. It had to be retooled
and rethought before it was publicly unveiled.
I remember little about
that adventure. We had access to the park with the passes we had been issued
and I used mine to ride the train a couple of times. We did have a big dinner
one night that was quite pricey, but, of course, we didn’t pay for it. It was
part of the whole package. I believe that George Knapp and Russ Estes continued
the celebration that night. I had been invited along but frankly, I was tired
and just wanted to go to bed.
But the point here is
the theory that the real purpose was to bring in the UFO experts and grill them
about their work, their evidence, and what plans they had for the future. Throw
in the link between the CIA and Disney, as shown by some of the documentation
that has been declassified over the years, and the theory is not all that
unreasonable.
This was also at the
time that the Air Force was investigating the Roswell UFO crash. I was going to
say, “reinvestigate,” but that might be a stretch. We don’t know exactly how
deep the original investigation was given what we have learned about the events
of 1947. That the government, meaning various agencies and organizations, has
played fast and loose with the facts, suggests this Disney adventure is
somewhat suspicious.
Of course, to be fair,
it should be noted that the Alien Encounter attraction might have been the
results of the growing interest in UFOs and alien encounters. Disney apparently
spent millions to bring the attraction to life, so the money spent bringing UFO
experts to Orlando for the panel discussions would not have been that much of
an expense when compared to everything else.
Still, those of us with
a conspiracy mindset, do have to wonder why there was so little promotion of
the panel discussions, so little was devoted to the documentary that grew out
of those discussions, and if the government just didn’t use Disney to disguise
their investigations without revealing their hand in the project. Sort of an
everybody wins… Disney opened an attraction that was originally popular, the
government learned more about the private research going on, and a dozen or so
of us got a nice, expenses paid vacation out of the deal.
Hey Kevin Randle. I'm having trouble finding a post where you discussed the date of the Roswell crash. Either it was the 2nd, 3rd, or 4th.
ReplyDelete