A
few days ago, I was asked about the true date of the Roswell crash. It was
pointed out that the dates that had been published in the past were July 2,
July 4 and July 8. I had settled on July 4 based on what Frank Kaufmann had
said and Kaufmann even produced a document with that date on it. When it turned
out that Kaufmann had been making up stuff, I rejected the July 4 date because,
well, Kaufmann was making up stuff.
In
the world today, I believe that Don Schmitt and Tom Carey have landed on the
July 2 date. This was the sighting by Dan Wilmot in Roswell of a craft heading,
more or less to the northwest. I’m not sure that it’s related to the crash
because the coincidence of being close in time and location to the crash
doesn’t necessarily mean that what Wilmot saw was what fell.
So,
the answer for the question, from my point of view is that I don’t know the
exact date, other than the first week in July. But this set me to thinking
about the timing of Mack Brazel’s trip into Roswell and what that tells us
about the events of early July.
Let’s
take a stroll down the timeline for all this and see what we can deduce.
We
know that the Project Mogul flight scheduled for June 4, 1947, was cancelled
based on Dr. Albert Crary’s diary. We know that they flew what he described as
a cluster of balloons sometime later that day and Charles Moore told me that it
was launched after the cancellation of the full array. We don’t need to argue
about what that means because it is irrelevant for this discussion.
Moore,
in his analysis, written after I had interviewed him, reported that the flight
was launched “probably around 0300 MST,” and that the flight lasted a
“calculated duration: 466 min,” or seven hours and forty-six minutes. Whether
it was launched before dawn or sometime later, on June 4, it would have landed
on the Brazel ranch (yes, for the purists, I know it was really the Foster
ranch) on June 4 either around noon or in the late afternoon. The exact time is
unimportant because whatever the time, it was still on June 4.
Charles Moore reviewing winds aloft data in Socorro. Photo by Kevin Randle. |
We
know, based on the documentation and the newspaper articles, that Major Jesse
Marcel, Sr. arrived in Fort Worth on July 8, 1947, with some of the recovered
debris. Some of the documentation suggests he left Roswell as early as ten in
the morning, while other information suggests it was later in the day. For our
purposes here, that doesn’t matter.
We
know, and this is based on my experiences driving from Roswell to the ranch, that
it takes about three hours to get there. That was on modern roads and routes,
which did not exist in 1947. Marcel, in interviews mentioned that they had
traveled overland but I’m not sure that would have cut much off the travel
time. This means, of course, that Marcel was on the scene on July 7 and returned
to Roswell very late on the seventh.
We
know, based on what Marcel said, that he had been eating lunch at the Officers
Club when Sheriff George Wilcox called him about the debris that Brazel had
brought to town. Given the sequence of events then, we know that Marcel, along
with Sheridan Cavitt, couldn’t have left Roswell much before four or five in
the afternoon and that puts them at the ranch too late in the evening to do
anything about the debris or examine the field in which it fell.
Since
Marcel was clearly in Roswell on July 8 and since he left for the Brazel ranch
late in the afternoon and remained there overnight, Brazel had to have arrived
at the sheriff’s office on July 6. It was too late on the July 7 for them,
Brazel, Marcel and Cavitt to have driven out to the ranch, examined the debris
found by Brazel and returned to Roswell that night. The only scenario that
makes sense was that Brazel had driven to Roswell on July 6.
The debris field identified by Bill Brazel for Kevin Randle and Don Schmitt. |
Of
course, there is the newspaper account that said Brazel had driven into Roswell
on July 7 to sell some wool. That simply does not track with the timing of the
drive back to the ranch, the examination of the field and the return to
Roswell. Marcel and Cavitt would have been required to make their inspection in
the dark. And, although Cavitt claimed that they didn’t remain there overnight,
Marcel did make such a claim. In my discussions with Cavett, it was clear that
he, along with Brazel and possibly Marcel, was there in the daylight.
But
the point is irrelevant to the present discussion because, no matter what date
Brazel drove to Roswell and what date Marcel and Cavitt followed him back the
to ranch, it all happened in early July. The three days, the sixth, seventh or
eighth, are the real markers here and, as I say, the exact date doesn’t matter
for this discussion.
There
is another point to be made here. Overlooking the fact that Brazel brought in
samples of the debris, which would have negated the need to drive out to the
ranch, if that debris was part of Project Mogul and if part of Mogul, it would
have fallen on June 4. In other words, it would have laid out, in that field,
for more than a month. We know, based on the testimony of Bill Brazel, and later
that of Tommy Tyree, the sometimes ranch hand, that Mack Brazel was in that
particular field every other day if not every day. The question becomes, why
did it take him a month to call in the military?
Here's
the rub. Had the debris been the remains of a Project Mogul balloon array, it
wouldn't have taken Brazel long to clean it up. Had it been a Project Mogul
balloon array, there would have been a reward card attached which would have
directed him to Alamogordo rather than Roswell. Moore talked about these reward
cards but said that not all the balloon arrays had them. This, of course, makes
little sense. Why wouldn’t all the arrays have had the reward cards?
We
were told by neighbors and by Bill Brazel, that Mack wondered who was going to
clean up the mess he had found. That suggests something much more robust than
the remains of a few weather balloons and some string. There is no evidence
that rawin targets were involved. Flight No. 5, the “first successful” flight
in New Mexico, had no rawin targets and Moore had suggested to me that the make-up
of Flight No.5 was the same as Flight No. 4. Later, he claimed that it was
closer to Flight No. 2 which did have rawin targets on it. But it was flown
months earlier on the East Coast and the documentation in New Mexico mentions
nothing about rawin radar targets until later in July.
We
know when Mack Brazel reported the debris to the military based on the timing
of the situation. That would have been on July 6, so the crash took place in
the days prior to that based on the need to water the livestock.
Given
what we know, whatever it was, fell in the days prior to July 6, most probably
on July 4 or 5. If we accept the July 7 date for his trip to Roswell, then the
craft, whatever it was, fell on July 6. I can’t narrow it down any more than
that because we have nothing to tell us the exact date of the crash. However,
we know that it wasn’t the Mogul array launched on June 4. Brazel would have
found it in the days that followed and would have reported it to those in
Roswell in early June. It was too far to make such a trip unless there was a
compelling reason to do so. That would have been the amount of debris that
suggests that he would not have been able to clean it all up quickly. Instead,
he drove into Roswell for the assistance of the military. As I say, he could
have picked up the remains of a Mogul balloon array in a matter of minutes and
not needed to go to Roswell. In fact, he could have loaded it all into his
pickup truck and taken to Roswell to show them. There would then be no reason
for Marcel and Cavitt to travel out to that field.
This
is just one more reason to reject the Mogul scenario. It doesn’t fit the
timing, doesn’t fit with the facts, and fails to explain why Brazel felt the
need to go to Roswell. He could have picked up the debris and that would have
been the end of it. Instead, he reported the debris to the Army and began a
mystery that continues after three-quarters of a century.
Agreed. Whilst the exact date of the impact is not necessarily an essential aspect of the Roswell case, the information we have on Mogul shows us which direction go, and that is clearly away from the balloon project. Thanks Kevin.
ReplyDeleteDear Kevin,
ReplyDeleteI hope you are doing well and are in good health.
In Jesse Marcel, Jr. and Linda Marcel's book, it mentions the summer storm and the great boom, reminiscent of an explosion.
By this time, December of 2022, do you know how sure the information is, regarding the thunderstorm and what day Brazel would have most likely heard the explosion? This would have been the day before he went out, wouldn't it?
Best,
Bob Koford
So Kaufmann's date for the crash--July 4, or midnight July 4-5--is plausible after all.
ReplyDeleteKevin: Don and Tom also settled on a July 2, 1947 date for the Roswell UFO crash because their research of the early July 1947 weather records indicated that the sole stormy night in the area during this period occurred on the late evening (circa 11 pm) of July 2. And Mack Brazel described this stormy weather as occurring on the night in question. This is per p. 29 of their ROSWELL: The Chronological Pictorial book (2020) and confirmed by Don during one of his lectures at the Roswell UFO Festival per my recollection.
ReplyDeleteYou may want to broach the subject during your next interview with either of them.
@John Steiger:
ReplyDeleteThat's contrary to what I've read, that the night of the 4th-5th was stormy. If the crash occurred as early as the evening of the 2nd, why didn't Brazel go to Roswell a day or two earlier, considering the strangeness of the material and importance of cleaning up the mess?
starman: Per my recollection, Mack Brazel did not decide to go into Roswell with debris samples until after he displayed debris samples at Wade's Bar in Corona on Saturday night, July 5, 1947. Other bar patrons urged him to bring his remarkable find into Roswell. Mr. Brazel was not motivated to go to Roswell before this, so the exact date does not matter as much based on this.
ReplyDeleteAnd he had good reason not to want to go. In 1947 it was a long hard all-day round trip to travel from Foster Ranch to Roswell and back. In addition, just like today postwar gas was not cheap. And he would be leaving his ranch animals, which were his prime responsibility of care.
Query: Just where did you read that the night of July 4-5, 1947 was stormy? Do you recall? Because I made my earlier statement based upon Don and Tom's research/book + my recall of Don's lecture. I have not investigated any primary sources myself. Thank you for your interest and response.
@John Steiger
ReplyDeleteSee THE TRUTH ABOUT THE UFO CRASH AT ROSWELL page 27, and note #1 for chapter three on page 220. Also page 160.
I think Brazel WOULD have been strongly motivated to go to Roswell because the mess was interfering with ranch operations. It had to be cleaned up ASAP.
Btw any comments on the unusual take of THE ALIEN GRAND DESIGN?
January 8, 2023
starman: I looked up your references in The Truth About The UFO Crash At Roswell (1994) and they are very interesting -- particularly the footnote. Aside from my prior comment (which I stand by), my only reply is that in limited correspondence with me, Tom Carey has suggested that I and others should rely on newer Roswell sources over older ones, because updated information about the crash has been discovered over time and this is more accurate.
ReplyDeleteHowever, to be frank, I am not at all sure that such is the case in this instance.
Re: The Alien Grand Design I am unfamiliar with it, other than it appears to be a book published in 2020 about UFO history by author Tim Donovan.
John Steiger: Sure, I cited a 30 year old book but assume weather records it mentions are valid regardless of the passage of time. Likewise the date of the storm must be based on Bill Brazel's memory of what his father told him; dunno how that can be updated either.
ReplyDeleteYes THE ALIEN GRAND DESIGN is a 2020 work by that author. It's obscure, no doubt because its highly controversial nature precluded standard trade publishing.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteWhat to make of other reports suggesting Brazel had found debris as early as June 14th? Thanks!
ReplyDeleteGrant Salmon: May I direct you to earlier articles on this A Different Perspective blog, such as May 09, 2007 Bessie Brazel and the Roswell Case; May 29, 2007 A Roswell Chronology; and September 19, 2015 Bessie Brazel Schreiber and the Roswell Crash, for starters. There is a lot to go through here, but if you are willing to put in the time, you should find answers to many of your questions on this point.
ReplyDelete