After
Dr. Avi Loeb announced that the extraterrestrial object that had passed through
the solar system was artificial, I had tried to get Dr. Michael Shermer on the
program. He asked for time so that he could review the evidence that Loeb had
presented and the request was reasonable but other factors intervened. Took a
while, but we had a chat about that and many other things. You can listen to
the show here:
https://www.spreaker.com/episode/49945825
Interestingly,
Shermer didn’t reject the theory that the artifact was manufactured, merely
suggested that other ideas were more likely. Any thinking individual would Dr, Michael Shermer
have
to agree that the artificial nature of the object was the least likely. That doesn’t
mean that can’t be artificial, only that there are other explanations that have
a greater chance of being accurate.
We
also talked about the recent Congressional hearing about UAPs. Again, I think
he and I were on the same basic page. I did express the opinion that the lack
of knowledge about the Malmstrom AFB encounter in which a flight of ballistic
missiles was shut down should have been something that Ronald Moultier and
Scott Bray should have known about because it was an issue of national
security. I’m not sure that Shermer understood my point.
We
did have the same sort of discussion about the Levelland sightings. Now, I know
that he wouldn’t have been as familiar with the case as I was, but my questions
weren’t really about the details of the case. I didn’t ask, for example, why so
many cars were stalled over such a wide area with the witnesses making
independent reports. I wanted to attack the Air Force explanation of “ball
lightning,” and ask if the skeptical mind shouldn’t have questioned that
solution rather than embracing it.
While
he brought up the Air Force claim of only three witnesses as explained by
Curtis Peeples in his book, Watch the Skies!, even the Air Force file on
the case gives us the names of five witnesses whose cars or trucks were stalled.
He also brought up the weather, but that point had been refuted by a document
in the Air Force files as well. A weather report that came from Roswell (Walker
Air Force Base) that had the weather from various stations in the southwest
showed that the weather in Lubbock was not overcast and there was no precipitation.
I fear that I didn’t make it clear that it was not the weather over Roswell but
the weather from Lubbock reported on the teletype message from Roswell. My
mistake. And, I didn’t really want to get bogged down in a long discussion of
the weather in Lubbock on November 2, 1957. Those who wish to see all that
information can look it up in Levelland (link to the left).
Finally,
because I had been asked to ask about the Hickson-Parker abduction Pascagoula
in 1973, I did. Shermer said that Philip Klass, who never met a UFO sighting he
couldn’t debunk, had said there were discrepancies and that Hickson had refused
to take a lie detector test.
Well,
Klass did say there were discrepancies, but he didn’t say that Hickson had
refused to take a lie detector test. He said he refused to take it from a reputable
firm, and that might be a justified complaint. However, by coincidence, I found
the following just a couple of hours ago:
On
the thirty-first of October, a UPI story out of Pascagoula announced that
Hickson had been given a lie detector test and the test confirmed he was
telling the truth as to what he believed happened. The test was conducted on
Tuesday, October 30, in the offices of Pendleton Detectives, Inc., in New
Orleans, Louisiana. Pendleton Detectives, Inc., is considered to be a very
reliable Firm and the test took two and a half hours to complete. (ABDUCTED!
Page 136, paperback edition.
It
really comes down to how reliable the detective agency is. And how reliable lie
detectors are. Klass, of course, was biased, but then again, so were the
Lorenzens.
Next
week, Michael Schratt will enter the arena to talk about his book, Dark
Files: A Pictorial History of Lost, Forgotten and Obscure UFO Encounters.
3 comments:
Kevin: The problem with Dr. Shermer is that he embraces anti-UFO prejudice right from the start. This is, of course, an all-too-common flaw within the skeptical and scientific communities.
For example, his claims that ETH is "very, very unlikely," and "if the evidence is just these blurry photographs and grainy videos, that's just not [going to] cut it in science." BUT THAT'S NOT 'JUST THE EVIDENCE.'
Dr. Shermer (in line with his many colleagues) is being willfully ignorant. He (and them) in large part can't be bothered to research the UFO literature on the subject. They pretend it doesn't exist ... except as 'Anomalies.'
Well, UFO investigators and researchers -- and in particular, yourself -- have uncovered quite a number of fascinating 'Anomalies,' e.g., Roswell, Levelland, Socorro, and Ariel School -- to name just a few, if the skeptics and scientists could only be spurred to give such cases due consideration. Unfortunately, there is a complete disconnect.
Shermer has already dismissed the sightings made by F/A-18 pilot David Fravor, so I'm curious; when Shermer interviewed Fravor, did it sound like (to Shermer) that Fravor was lying or was confused about what he saw?
Shermer has already dismissed the sightings made by F/A-18 pilot David Fravor, so I'm curious; when Shermer interviewed Fravor, did it sound like (to Shermer) that Fravor was lying or was confused about what he saw?
Post a Comment