Although it has been
more than a week since Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick briefed the Senate Armed Services
Committee about the progress and logistics of the UAP Program, I thought I’d
add a few items I noticed. First, the room was lightly populated by Senators.
There were just three.
The Senate hearing room with Sean Kirkpatrick and others. |
Sean Kirkpatrick, who
leads the All-domain Anomaly Office, known as ARRO, provided a statement that
had little to do with their investigative work and more about the logistics of
creating an investigative team.
UFOs, or UAPs or ETs,
were mentioned twice. Kirkpatrick said, “In our research, ARRO has found no credible evidence thus far of
extraterrestrial activity, off-world technology or objects that defy the known
laws of physics.”
Later he said, “In the event sufficient scientific data
were ever obtained that a UAP encountered can only be explained by
extraterrestrial origin, we are committed to working with our interagency
partners at NASA to appropriately inform the U.S. government's leadership of
its findings.”
Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick |
Ironically, he did say
that there was a plan in place in case any alien activity is encountered. I can
think of several cases in which the alien explanation is currently the only one
available, including Roswell, Levelland and more recently Rendlesham Forest as
but three examples. In all these cases there are multiple witnesses, some very
high-ranking people involved but these are all outside the purview of ARRO. I
do have to wonder exactly what this contingency plan that Kirkpatrick hinted
about has to say.
The real point is that
here we are a couple of years into this investigation and all we have are some
statistics, several videos, and little real information about what they are
doing, which, if we listened closely to Kirkpatrick, is investigating
terrestrial threats, which are, of course, of national security interest.
To me, as I have said
in the past, this is Robertson 2.0. One of the suggestions by the Robertson
Panel, which, by the way, was sponsored by the CIA, was to take a mysterious
sighting, report it, and then solve it. If we look carefully at this whole
question of Navy cockpit videos and the government response, we see how That has
been stage managed.
Those videos were
mysterious. We are told they have been validated by the Navy, except the Navy
wasn’t saying that the videos showed alien spacecraft. They were saying that
yes, the videos did come from the Navy. They weren’t identifying the objects
seen, other than to talk about the mysterious characteristics but now tell us
that it was a technological glitch.
In the meantime, we now
ignore the testimony by the pilots and crewmembers involved. No one has
explained how a technological glitch in the cockpit of a fighter manifests
itself as a blip on a surface vessel radar screen… oh, yes, we are told by
skeptics there are always uncorrelated targets on the radar screens. Well, that
explains that.
My point is that we are
seeing the playing out how Robertson saw it in 1953. People will remember the
explanation, even if that explanation is bogus. They’ll forget the details of
the sighting.
The best example of
this is the Mogul explanation for the Roswell crash. There are dozens of
witnesses who talked about what they had seen themselves. They talked about the
unusual properties of the debris and that the debris was widely scattered over
a pasture near Corona, New Mexico.
But then comes the
explanation. It was a balloon array and radar reflectors from the highly
classified Project Mogul. Except what was going on in New Mexico wasn’t highly
classified. In fact, it wasn’t classified at all. Pictures of the balloons were
printed in the newspaper just two days after the announcement they had
“captured” a flying saucer. True, the ultimate purpose was classified, but the
experiments in New Mexico were not.
Claiming that it was
Flight No. 4 of Project Mogul fails because the field notes and diary entries
by the leader of the project in New Mexico, Dr. Albert Crary, documented the
fact that Flight No. 4 was cancelled. Now few question how a flight that was
cancelled could have spread debris on the Foster Ranch, and why that debris lay
out there for more than a month before Mack Brazel found it in a field that he
was in nearly every day. I have covered this here, on this blog and in both Roswell
in the 21st Century and Understanding Roswell.
But I digress. ARRO is
actually the Robertson Panel suggestion for explaining mysterious UFOs, I mean
UAP sightings. I see what they’re doing but too many don’t understand the what
is happening. They are now attempting to change UFO into UAP and overlook the long
history of the phenomenon. They are giving us mysterious sightings and then
explaining them. Just look at the numbers that Kirkpatrick provided in his
latest, poorly attended briefing. Once, they had answers for only one of 144
incidents. Now, with many more sightings, they are explaining many more with
language that sounds impressive but means nothing.
Or, in more precise
language, I note that the program to rid the world of UFO reports, note I said
reports as opposed to sightings, is being slowly implemented here. It took them
a while to figure all this out after the Condon Committee’s “scientific”
investigation failed to end the problem. After years of attempting to ignore it
by deflecting reports to local law enforcement, we are at the point of
information manipulation. They can’t provide all we need to know because of the
specter of national security.
Some of us understand
what is happening because we have been around for a long time and seen it all
before. This is just the latest government program designed to influence
civilian thought. But UFOs, I mean UAPs, are not going away. As an example, is a
sighing from Ocean Shores, New South Wales, in Australia was reported on April
8 of this year. The witness, in his backyard watched an object that passed
directly overhead. It was triangular in shape with about ten lights along the
forward two sides and three on the trailing edge. None of the lights were
flashing.
According to the
witness, he could not see the stars within the triangle as it passed over. The
UFO was the size of a football field (which is probably a soccer field given
the location) and there was no sound. It appeared to be close and was in sight
for about twenty seconds until it disappeared over a hill.
And, in keeping with
the report from ARRO which provided a video of an orb, the witness in Bedford,
Virginia, watched several orb-like objects for two minutes on April 7 of this
year while driving. According to the witness, the orbs were low and moved
erratically at high speed. They changed color from red to blue to green. The
witness said that he looked to the rear to be sure there were no aircraft with
lights or emergency vehicles there. There was a car in front and the witness
was sure that they had seen the orbs as well.
I will note that neither of these sightings will make it into the new investigation because they come from the civilian world. That’s just another indication of government manipulation of our attitudes. Just thought I’d mention it.
2 comments:
While I feel that you are probably correct in asserting that AARO is more of a public relations/public opinion steering program*, there's an alternate explanation for what we're (not) seeing come out of that office: perhaps they're just bad at their jobs.
*With the real program operating behind the scenes...as always.
Interested to know more about the Ocean Shores NSW triangle sighting. May I ask how you came across the report. Was it reported to MUFON or another UFO organization in Australia. Thanks.
Post a Comment