Thursday, October 23, 2025

The New Jesse Marcel Interview

Periodically, I’m asked if there is anything new to be found about the Roswell crash. I believe that all the first-hand witnesses to those events in July 1947 have died. The last first-hand witness I interviewed was Stanley Muelling on January 18, 2012 when he was 87 years old.

He made it clear that he had been told to never talk about what he had seen. He said, “If I did, I already forgot about it. I’m supposed to forget.”

At that point, meaning in 2012, we realized that there were very few left who would have been in Roswell at the right time. Although today Muelling would be 100, it is certainly possible for him to still be alive, but I know of no one still alive who could provide a first-hand account that would add to our basic knowledge of the case.

That doesn’t mean that there aren’t other means of gathering first-hand testimony. Just this week, we learned from David Marler at the National UFO Historical Records Center in Albuquerque that Lee Speigel had interviewed Jesse Marcel, Sr. about Roswell in the early 1980s. That interview was recorded and is available on YouTube at:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xC3Ln3-tyds

He asked Marcel about the beginnings of the tale and Marcel provided us the details of how he learned about the crash site and his meeting with Mack Brazel. Marcel gathered Sheridan Cavitt to follow Brazel back to the ranch. This is slightly interesting because Bessie Brazel Schreiber who had talked about accompanying her father into Roswell to report what he had found isn’t mentioned. Bill Brazel has disputed Bessie’s claim and here is Marcel, talking about following Brazel to the ranch, stopping at what he called a shack where the ate beans and rice but no mention of Bessie Brazel being there. That takes her out of the picture and her claims that it was a huge balloon, are negated. I mention this so we don’t get bogged down in a discussion about her role in this and point out that she later repudiated her claim that she was there.

The Debris Field. Brazel took Don Schmitt and me to the top
of the rise and pointed down. You can see that a gouge
should have been visible to Marcel.


And listening to this, I think that Marcel has gotten the timeline wrong. He told Speigel, “And by the time I got back home, my wife, is what happened to you? There’s been a bunch of news reporters out here wanting a picture of you and I said, ‘For what.’’’

There would have been no reporters interested in Jesse Marcel on July 7 when he returned from the debris field. The only people who knew what had been found were Brazel, Marcel and Cavitt. Naturally, when Cavitt returned, he would have notified his superior in Albuquerque since Cavitt’s chain of command was different than Marcel’s. It is probable that Cavitt, out of courtesy, would have told Blanchard, but there was no requirement for that. Cavitt might just have waited for Marcel to return to tell Blanchard about the crash.

The point is, that the press release wasn’t issued until the afternoon of July 8, at which time the reporters would have learned about Marcel. At that point they certainly could have arrived at his house to ask questions. Marcel was in Fort Worth at the time and wouldn’t return until July 9.

Major Jesse Marcel with the balloon debris in 
General Ramey's office in Fort Worth.




   

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

In this interview, Marcel reconfirms the size of the debris field being ¾ of a mile long and several hundred feet wide. He suggested there was quite a bit of metallic debris. He talked about filling the jeep carry all with debris and that he, Marcel, filled his Buick as well. He said there was quite a lot of it left behind. The real point here is that a Mogul array, would not have filled the jeep carry all. And, since it is clear from the testimony of Charles Moore, an engineer with the balloon project in Alamogordo, that Flight #4, the culprit in this, did not have rawin targets. The remains of the balloon array would have fit into the Marcel’s car trunk. These facts rule out Mogul.

Marcel said that he sent Cavitt back to the base with a truckload of debris and that he, Marcel, stayed on quite a bit. He then drove home, arriving about eight that evening.

There is one point that I’m sure the skeptics will seize on, if they are paying attention. Asked about when he was getting curious about flying saucers, Marcel said:

On thing I wanted to explore, I wanted to find out if it was an object that hit the ground. And obviously it was not because no scar on the ground anywhere. Something obviously exploded in the air and fragments scattered all over the place… Well, this is what happened. I scoured the ground. I looked all over the place to see if I could see any scare one the ground, if something had fallen our of the sky and hit the ground. But that was not in evidence at all. It was obviously something that exploded while in flight and scattered fragments on the ground as it traveled.

This is in direct conflict with what Bill Brazel told both Don Schmitt and me, as we stood on the debris field. Brazel said it was about five hundred yards long and about ten feet wide at its widest. He said that it took about two years before is was completely grassed over.

Bill Brazel on the Debris Field with Don Schmitt.
Photo by Kevin Randle.
We also interviewed Bud Payne a retired judge who escorted us to the debris field in the early 1990s. Payne pointed to the same areas as had Bill Brazel, telling us about a gouge in the ground.

Brigadier General Arthur Exon, who flew over the area in the months that followed mentioned two crash sites. He was referring to the debris field near Corona, and another site closer to Roswell. He mentioned seeing vehicle tracks in the area and a gouge, confirming what Brazel had told others several months earlier.

This is something of a conundrum. According to Brazel, the gouge was obvious, but Marcel doesn’t mention it. He talks about the size of the debris field and says the object exploded in the air. Don, Tom Carey and I have all stood on the raised ground at the beginning of the debris field and from that vantage point, we can see to the point that Brazel indicated was the end of the gouge. I have no idea why Marcel said that he didn’t see it.

There are many other gems in the Speigel interview. He asked Marcel about any personal UFO sightings. Marcel talked about seeing a strange formation of lights prior to the events of July 1947. According to Marcel, he had been called by the provost marshal and told to hurry out to the base. Marcel told Speigel, that this was something that he had never mentioned to anyone.

Marcel said, “And while going out there as fast as my car could run, I saw some lights in the sky, but it was a defined formation. It is a perfect “V” formation.”

He said that the formation was visible from overhead to the horizon, and suggested the formation was moving faster than any aircraft in the military inventory of 1947.

He did mention it to Major Edwin Easley who was the provost marshal at the time. Easley said that some of the boys over here saw that too.

Marcel said, “What it was, I still don’t know.”

One of the other criticisms of the Marcel testimony was his suggestion that he didn’t know what it was but he was sure that while it came to Earth, it was not from Earth. Skeptics wondered how he made this leap because, in 1947, there were tales of spaceships in the Buck Rogers’ comic strip and Flash Gordon was battling Ming the Merciless, but no real suggestion of alien visitation.

An interesting point, but Brazel’s arrival in Roswell was about two weeks after Kenneth Arnold made his sighting. Newspapers of the time were filled with stories about other flying saucer reports, not to mention the Foo Fighters of World War II and the Ghost Rockets seen over Scandinavia in 1946. Marcel, as the intelligence officer would have been aware of all these things so that when he was confronted with metallic debris that was so foreign to him, he recognized none of it and when he saw the size of the debris field, the conclusion that it was something off world wasn’t that radical. Speculations in the newspapers of the time ran the gambit from spots before the eyes, war hysteria, outright hoxes to creatures from Mars and Venus. Marcel didn’t grab the idea out of thin air; it was floating right there in front of him

There are additional questions that need answers in this newly retrieved interview. There are other points that seem to be contradictory. All this must be examined with an unbiased and dispassionate eye. And we need to put it into the context of the time, remembering that some memories fade and others are modified when new information is encountered. Sometimes the witnesses don’t lie, but are telling the truth as they remember it. Sometimes they get it right and sometimes they get it wrong and sometimes they just want their fifteen minutes in the spotlight.

If Marcel was a stand-alone witness on the Roswell crash, we would be right rejecting all that he says as delusion or confabulation. But every member of Colonel Blanchard’s staff we interviewed, with one exception, suggested the extraterrestrial as the ultimate solution. And there were dozens of others who had a small piece of the pie that when added to other pieces suggests something other than a weather balloon. 

9 comments:

David Rudiak said...

I stumbled across the Lee Spiegel/Marcel interview on Youtube last week. It came as a bit of a surprise to me. I'm working on a transcript, but it may take a while. A few minor observations:

The Gouge: Yes, a conundrum. Marcel didn't mention it, in fact explicitly denying finding anything like an impact site. This has made me consider the possibility that the gouge wasn't craft-made, but man-made after Marcel's visit, during the recovery operation, by earth-moving equipment like bulldozers removing dirt down to bedrock. The purpose being to get every scrap of debris that may have become imbedded in the soil. As Sgt. Robert Smith wrote in his affidavit: "We were taken to the hangar to load crates. There was a lot of farm dirt on the hangar floor." (www.roswellproof.com/smith.html). If they picked up all debris by hand, I wouldn't expect "a lot of dirt" to be mixed in.

Smith was also an eyewitness to the so-called memory metal, heavy security, unknown men in plainclothes flashing unknown badges running things (CIC agents?), and knowing of a Truman Secret Service agent there because he also happened to be a distant cousin.

Bessie Brazel Schreiber testimony: Yes, another conundrum. Based on her debris descriptions, I think she may have gotten things mixed up with an actual Mogul Flight that may have come down near the Foster Ranch. I have a Web page plotting where the various Mogul flights 1947-1949 crashed. As I wrote there: "... there is only one flight, #38, Nov. 4, 1947, that may have crashed anywhere near the Foster Ranch. It was noted in records as crashing about 50 miles North of Roswell, but the exact position wasn't known (the chase plane couldn't find the final site). If it was due north, this still would have left it about 40 miles east of the debris field. Even if we assume 20 miles East/West uncertainty (arrows), the balloon would have ended up no closer than 20 miles away." See plot & discussion: www.roswellproof.com/Mogul_Crashes.html#anchor_7

A bit of evidence in support of this is her description of the metallic-like material in her affidavit: "...The pieces were small, the largest I remember measuring about the same as the diameter of a basketball. Most of it was a kind of double-sided material, foil-like on one side and rubber-like on the other. Both sides were grayish-silver in color, the foil more silvery than the rubber. ...The foil-rubber material could not be torn like ordinary aluminum foil can be torn..."

Flight #38 involved an experimental balloon material made of nylon cloth, rubberized on one side to prevent gas loss, painted with aluminum paint on the other side to reflect the sun and prevent overheating. This is very similar to what Schreiber described, but I wouldn't expect it to come down in smaller pieces. If this theory is correct, it's an example of confusion, not lying by a witness. (No, her debris testimony doesn't support a June "Flight #4" scenario, which would have used ordinary rubber weather balloons.)

Marcel UFO sighting pre-Roswell: Also brought up in his Bob Pratt interview.

Paul T. Semones said...

Kevin, thanks for highlighting this newly published interview with Marcel Sr.

I wanted to outline a few items that may be of value to the analysis of this new recording:

First item – the date of the interview. David Marler was kind enough to forward the electronic audio file to my research partner, Toby Martinez of the Roswell Daily Record. The file as Marler named it was “Lee Speigel interviews Jesse Marcel Sr 11-11-80”, so in other words, he has it logged as occurring on November 11, 1980.

This makes it the earliest long-form, unedited audio we have of Marcel (although there are numerous slips or breaks in the tape over its 47 minute length). While some of the important things he says here – which have produced some astonished reactions – are not new, this is the first time we have Marcel’s own voice saying them. That makes this tape hugely valuable in clearing up certain points in his testimony. (Incidentally, it corroborates Linda Corley’s efforts to transcribe accurately her recording with Marcel from a few months later in 1981.)

Can we trust the date given by Marler? Well, most (though not all) of the internal timing clues within the interview fit with a 1980 year, and Spiegel and Marcel comment near the end of the tape on the Berlitz/Moore book now being available, which was released I believe in October, 1980 – but Marcel had not yet received his promised copies from Moore. Spiegel also discussed this interview in a 2015 Huffington Post article, calling it a 35-year-old interview. So November 1980 is reasonable.

Unfortunately, I don’t have any info on what was written on Spiegel’s cassette tape label, although I have seen some of Lee Spiegel’s other tapes that do provide some information. Toby and I have been aware that this interview was in Marler’s archive for about two years now; Toby had a chance to listen to some of it on the original cassette tape last year (2024) and I got to hear some of it while I was driving cross-country as he held his cell phone up to the cassette player’s speaker. We have eagerly awaited its digitization to be able to study its entire 47 minutes.

It is worth clarifying, for those who may not have the full timeline of Marcel’s interviews at their fingertips, that we do have earlier audio and video, albeit edited, of Marcel talking about the case. Prior to November 1980 he has, of course, already spoken to the cameras for the “UFOs Are Real” and “In Search Of” film and television productions. (Now if only we could find complete tapes of that footage, as well as the WWL-TV series and Marcel’s appearance on “That’s Incredible!”)

For further context on this date, the sad irony is that just one day after the Spiegel interview, the Marcels suffer a tragic death in the family due to a car crash in Montana. This is quite sobering to realize, and it is worth remembering that in the midst of all this newfound publicity in 1980, the Marcel family had to carry on through tragic loss and persevered in telling their story in the ensuing years.

(Will continue with two other points in a follow-up post due to length limits.)

Paul T. Semones said...

(Post 2 of 2)

Second item – the problem of the newspaper reporters being claimed as bothering Mrs. Marcel at the house. This has been a conundrum at least since Linda Corley’s interview with Jesse and Viaud Marcel was published. It certainly seems like a confused timeline in their memory … at least it seemed that way for me until I discovered something I had never seen mentioned in any of the literature. The Marcels’ next door neighbor in 1947, living at 1302 W. Seventh Street, was none other than Don C. Wright, the editor in chief of the Roswell Daily Record! I stumbled across this fact when trolling the 1947 phone book earlier this year and was stunned. (If I am not the first to recognize this, by all means, please let me know!) I spent some time trying to examine the microfilmed property records for both houses to establish some confirmation that Wright and Marcel were indeed living next to each other simultaneously, and got to about an 80 percent confidence level on this answer. There is still some work to do to firm this up completely.

But one can certainly imagine that a responsible newsman with his ear to the ground could have picked up on whatever info Frank Joyce and Sheriff Wilcox had gleaned from Brazel, and decided to go knock on the Marcel door while the Major was away on the Foster Ranch. A reasonable explanation for Viaud Marcel’s memory is right in front of us, and one more accusation of witnesses’ faulty memories becomes that much weaker.

(Incidentally, Kevin, I know you had reported in an article at some point that there was a neighbor by the name of Boehm who claimed to have heard Jesse Junior talk about a flying saucer in their kitchen, but I have had no luck finding any record of a Boehm as neighbor to the Marcels.)

Interestingly, both Wright and the publisher of the Roswell Daily Record left the paper for a stretch of time in August 1947 – the month after the flying saucer incident. Curious timing, to say the least!

Third item – Marcel’s insistence that there was no gouge. Again, this is a fact that has been long known from written material, but now we have audio to this effect with all of its human nuance. I do have a data point that could possibly allow this contradiction to be not as absolute as it seems. Earlier this year (2025), I interviewed Allan Lavigne, who was involved with APRO in the 1970’s. Since at least two years ago, beginning (as far as I know) in a Richard Dolan YouTube video, Allan has discussed how he interviewed Marcel by phone very early in the ufological community’s Roswell investigation. When I talked to Allan, I tried to elicit any details that would narrow down when Allan (with Jim Lorenzen present) had his phone call with Marcel. The best I can figure, it was early 1979. (So possibly before even Bill Moore and Stan Friedman had gotten their investigation going.) This makes Allan’s interview one of the earliest known ufological interviews with Marcel, perhaps preceded only by the earliest initial contacts with Stan Friedman, Steve Tom and Leonard Stringfield.

Unfortunately, Allan has said that there is no record nor any notes from the call, so we have only his 45-year-old recollections to go on. But one thing he told me that I’m not sure he had said elsewhere was quite intriguing, and I will reproduce it as I typed it during our call as I tried to capture, as nearly as possible, Allan’s exact words: “He [Marcel] told me specifically – like it skid across, if I recall correctly there was some charring. Now maybe he said that or the rancher said it. Not a gouge like an airliner crash, but there was some deformation like you dragged something across the area.”

So we have a very, very early bit of testimony attributed to Marcel, that leaves open the possibility that he did indeed see some indication of contact with the ground; just not the heavy gouging other witnesses described a decade or so later. We may have a discrepancy that is more a matter of degree, than a matter of absolute contradiction.

KRandle said...

Paul -

Just a quick note here. I interviewed Johnny Mann in his home in Amarillo, Texas, about his Marcel interview. At the time he also interview Charles Hickson about his abduction. Mann told me that they retained the raw Hickson footage because, at that time, they thought it was the more important interview. Once the series aired, the tapes of the Marcel interview were reused, so that the raw footage does not exist. I was interested in tracking it down and that was in the mid-1990s. Mann said he regretted the choice.

David Rudiak said...

Paul T. Semones
Lot's of interesting and insightful Roswell esoterica I haven't seen before.

The "skid", "deformation", "drag" area of the debris field, allegedly related by Marcel to Allan Lavigne: Sometimes referred to as the "skip" zone in some Roswell literature (like Schmitt/Carey), or where the disintegrating flight object allegedly "skipped" off the ground, becoming airborne again before crashing to earth again some miles away. (the second crash site approximately 40 miles north of Roswell, with bodies)

If this scenario is correct, the object lightly impacted the ground, which conceivably could have shedded debris and driven it into the soil. This would be consistent with my theory that this area could have been further dug up to remove and recover every bit of debris and leave no incriminating evidence behind. The recovery operation would have caused the much more prominent "gouge" described by a few witnesses, like Brazel Jr., who described seeing the gouge after the military had already left. Still a little strange that Marcel did not allude to this deformation/drag area in any known recorded interview. Maybe it wasn't that prominent so as to stick out in his memories decades later.

The editor of the Roswell Daily Record (Don C. Wright) living next to Marcel: Yes, it seems very plausible that Wright might have heard about Brazel's discovery early on from the likes of KGFL radio reporter/announcer Frank Joyce, his boss Walt Whitmore, and Sheriff George Wilcox. This would prompt him to go next door and talk to Marcel's wife Viaud while Marcel was still away in the field investigating. Viaud Marcel would probably not know anything about it (or knew to keep her mouth shut), and refer Wright to the base and Col. Blanchard.

Paul then writes:
"Interestingly, both Wright and the publisher of the Roswell Daily Record left the paper for a stretch of time in August 1947 – the month after the flying saucer incident. Curious timing, to say the least!"

Yes, a little suspicious, but not a smoking gun. Maybe they both took summer vacation at the same time. Or perhaps someone like Wright and the publisher (Thomas Shearman) learned too much and were soon “re-educated”. Another small RDR-related item appeared recently in a Roswell documentary. As I wrote on my website in the Glenn Dennis Roswell body page (www.roswellproof.com/dennis.html):

"Very recently, Barbara Beck, current publisher of the Roswell Daily Record, stated that her father, Robert Beck, the publisher since 1955 (but who began with the RDR in Dec. 1947 after marrying the daughter [Marjorie Shearman] of the previous publisher, told her he knew the Ballard family, who owned Ballard Funeral Home. At some point, Ballard related to him that they received a call from the base at night for four small, child-sized caskets. They were to leave them at the base, but not go inside. Beck's father told her he found the base request really odd, but no explanation was given and he didn't ask questions. She described her father as having served in the military and a no-nonsense businessman. (Related on the CW Network, 2020, "Mysteries Decoded: Roswell Revisited" S1E9, 5:00' in ) https://www.cwtv.com/shows/mysteries-decoded/roswell-revisited/?play=ef0ee23f-9fcb-4934-a1ea-3e1795e7eddb&viewContext=Search+Page

Conceivably someone from Ballards' also spoke to Wright and publisher Shearman back at the time, making them a little too knowledgeable. Frank Joyce also related to me that he suffered a mental breakdown several months later after witnessing even more weirdness and was in a mental hospital for a year. He further told me something bad happened to his doctor that was very suspicious, though he wasn't specific. Yes, very conspiratorial, but it is in line with other testimony of death threats to keep some witnesses silent, particularly as it related to the recovery of bodies.

John Steiger said...

Kevin & Everyone Else -- While Jesse Marcel, Sr. is a witness to the Roswell crash, he is nowhere near as VITAL a witness as most commentators -- both skeptics/debunkers and proponents/believers -- would have him be. There was problematical testimony from Col. Marcel, Sr. even before Mr. Spiegel's interview re-surfaced.

Therefore, in my theatrical play THE ROSWELL TRIAL: A Courtroom Drama (Flying Disk Press 2020), I intentionally de-emphasized the role of Col. Marcel, Sr. as a witness toward proving the truth of Roswell being an actual ET event, because the case does not rise nor fall upon Marcel's testimony about his experience.

map any slide said...

Great to learn more thanks to the National UFO Records Center in Albuquerque! Speaking of archives, this morning I woke to listen to George Knapp interview a researcher who similarly mines archives to uncover the history of ufology.

https://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2025-10-26-show/

@ David
The guest mentioned you and your website by name. I was reminded of your comment about the metallic rubbery foil material when the guest mentioned "metallic bubblegum" during the interview. What is the final count as to the number of crash sites near Roswell in 1947? Was the number one or two? Thought we decided the stories of a second crash site were fiction. Anyway, the idea of how the object may have bounced before it crashed led to some intriguing speculation about exotic engineering and the physics of the object.

Completely agree how Marcel's suggestion that the debris came from off world was not radical, and decades later remains as reasonable as ever. Yes, we can reasonably consider that whatever crashed in 1947 could be extraterrestrial. All terrestrial explanations to explain away the event only satisfy skeptics. The other hypotheses involving time travel, extra dimensions, or demonic deception were made without evidence unlike the interplanetary hypothesis as planets in outer space are certainly known to exist. Is that too unreasonable to say?

Thanks for the posts and reports! Goodbye for now.

CDA said...

Kevin, the ads on your blog site (mobile) are unnecessarily disruptive. From what is stated on the web, blogspot.com ads are under control of the site owner although they may make the control(s) non-obvious. The ads degrade the experience for me.

KRandle said...

CDA -

Yeah, I have thought about it, but I was hoping to generate a little income to defray the cost of various medications. Yours is the first complaint and frankly, I have been thinking about dumping that whole ad thing.