Thursday, September 22, 2016

X-Zone Broadcast Network - Curt Collins

This week’s show concerned the Roswell Slides and the Cash/Landrum sighting of December 1980. The guest was Curt Collins who runs the Blueblurrylines website that can be found at www.blueblurrylines.com. The show can be heard here:


While I hadn’t planned to spend much time on the Roswell Slides, Collins provided some information that is important to those who read this blog and who have an interest in the Roswell Slides. He pointed out that according to what Don Schmitt said prior to the May 5, 2015, presentation in Mexico City, he had seen slides, and in fact was the first to meet with the owner (though it isn’t clear if he meant Adam Dew or Joe Beason). You can hear his statements of April 12,2015 here:


The relevant section comes at about the 106:00 point of the interview and with Tom Carey and then Don Schmitt talking about seeing the slides.

Tom Carey talked about the high resolution scans when he gave another interview on April 20, 2015 which can be heard here:


Tom Carey talks about receiving the high resolution scans of the slides in an email at 131:30 and then provides descriptions at 137:00 and 141:00.

You can also read, in detail, the story of the slides on this blog beginning in the months prior to the reveal in Mexico City. Just use the search engine and Roswell Slides. There is also a long chapter about them in Roswell in the 21st Century.

While we didn’t get to the Cash/Landrum sighting until later in the show, you can find out more about it at:

Next week’s show: Carol Rainey

Topic: Abductions

9 comments:

Curt Collins said...

My apologies to Kevin and his listeners for extending the "Roswell Slides" portion of the show beyond the allotted time, but I felt discussing the story as a (failed) UFO investigation was important. Unfortunately that left time only to cover only an intro to the Cash-Landrum case, and we barely got to mention the more recent discoveries and devlopments.

One thing I hope someone here can help me with:
The original Project VISIT Cash-Landrum case report by John Schuessler was sent to MUFON, APRO, CUFOS and maybe a few other places. It's an important historical record of the case, and yet in years of searching, unfamiliar been unable to obtain a copy. I'd like to see that made available and openly shared. If anyone can help with that, please let me know.

zoamchomsky said...

>> Vickie initially reported "There was nothing happened to me but my eyes is burned," while photos (dates unknown but presumably later) purport to show localized spotty burns or scars from burns to the arm, hand and forehead resulting from exposure to heat radiating from the "UFO." Certainly Vickie would know and would say if she had been burned. But no, Vickie got burned later, somehow.

>> Relatively distant radiating sources cannot produce localized effects composed of well-defined spots. As with the rest of their phony "UFO" narrative, it's nonsense, it's simply not the way things are and work. One cannot be NOT burned after a "UFO" encounter and later exhibit burns attributed to that event and be believed by rational people.

>> Just as one doesn't later claim that "We thought it was the end of time" but during the event, get out of her car and walk toward that frightening apocalyptic vision of intense heat and light for a closer look and be taken seriously because no one, not even good ol' Betty, would do that.

>> Exactly like the ridiculously stupid and impossible details of heat and radiation, which--if true--would have burnt them immediately and killed them in days! And the very same is true of every other bit of their fantastic celestial, and horribly noisy, event over northeastern Houston that somehow tens of thousands failed to observe, an event that--if real--would have made LIVE TV news but didn't!

>> "...over toward Crosby and Intercontinental Airport was the way they were."--BC Yeah, right, Betty! And let's hear that East-Texas drawl again: "We thought it was the end of time."

And not two or three but TWENTY-THREE Chinooks! And about two dozen other tells in their laughably dopey and impossible "Maury Island Meets TDTESS and the Apocalypse" conspiracy retread. "You gonna see a man, and that man's gonna be Jesus."--VL

Why would anyone consider this obvious make-it-up tabloid trash for even a second?

Read all about this crude hoax at Curt's "Blue Blurry Lines."

Curt Collins said...

Zoam, you raise some valid points, but your comments betray a stubborn bias and a lack of imagination. You've failed to consider that the witnesses may have been hexed by a witch.

More seriously, I can't understand your hostility to the witnesses. Any animosity should be directed towards the UFO investigators and organizations that promoted the case. They presented only the evidence that supported the story, and buried anything that might damage it.

purrlgurrl said...

Zoam - I believe they actually saw something unusual they couldn't explain or understand based on their knowledge and experience.

All the rest of it was prompted by spurious and overzealous, obsessed UFO believers and tabloid publications and TV . . . just like Roswell.

Lose the condescension to the witnesses.

zoamchomsky said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Wayne Patterson said...

There was no indication that these ladies lied, and their injuries baffled the doctors involved. The immediate repaving of the road adds to the case. People like Chomsky show why Cody, now grown shows bitterness toward people who want to question him. The ladies had no reason, nor means to stage a hoax, and suffered from this. Yes Chomsky, a contemptible post, just like the writings of your namesake.....he would be so proud.

zoamchomsky said...

Curt; I hate to see a good guy enchanted by such a bogus story. But you've done excellent work on it in your pursuit of truth so I suppose as a hobby it's time well spent. Life is short.

PG; I accept that people see things in the sky they fail to identify, but not all "UFO" stories are the results of such real experiences. People often make up stories out of nothing and manufacture evidence, we call these hoaxes. The usual reasons are attention and money. I'm not fond of hoaxsters.

There is simply no way that Betty and Vickie could have seen what they say--a glowing, flaming diamond the size of a water tower--on the shore of Lake Houston and all of Kingwood and Humble not see it. And then there were two dozen large and noisy Chinook helicopters that arrived and escorted the "unidentified flying water tower" west for all of northern Houston to see. It didn't happen.

And like some phony flying-saucer photo, Betty and Vickie's stupid self-inflicted injuries were merely evidence that the event of their otherwise evidenceless and laughably impossible story never occurred.

Check out the video where Betty says, "We thought it was the end of time." And in it Vickie repeats her version, telling Colby, "You gonna see a man, and that man's gonna be Jesus."

Like every other aspect of this story, it just doesn't make sense: It's an apocalyptic vision but Betty gets out of the car and walks toward it for a closer look? No way. It's an apocalyptic vision but the USAF is responsible for their (superficial, self-inflicted) injuries? Absurd.

PG; It's all nothing but a homespun "flying saucer" conspiracy mashup of Maury Island and Falcon Lake--both hoaxes--TDTESS and the Invaders TV show, and a few other things.

http://badufos.blogspot.com/2013/11/between-beer-joint-and-some-kind-of.html

Wayne Patterson said...

Sure zoam, they "couldn't have seen" what they saw in a rural wooded area at night, because you "know" everything that exists.....
The ladies " laughable injuries" disturbed the hospital physician, because he wasn't as clever as you.
And the "hilarity" of their religious based fears are really a hoot for a clever fellow like you.....those dimwit flyover country trash, right?
I am always amazed when I see someone educated beyond their native intelligence

KRandle said...

All -

The one point on all this that has disturbed me, and I have pointed it out repeatedly is that no one ever found a sign of all those helicopters. It's just not so many, but the time of the year and the logistics necessary to move that many helicopters into the area with no sign of them ever being found. You have two pilots for each aircraft, you have other air crewmen, you have support people, fuel requirements, billeting for everyone, a need to feed them. There would be a huge footprint for the military presence, not to mention that at that time of the year many of those whose jobs are critical are on leave.