This
week I reached out to Stephen Bassett, he of Disclosure fame. Given what has
been happening the last few weeks, with so much that is positive coming out, I
thought it time to take another look at Disclosure. Bassett provided an
interesting
history of how we reached the point we have reached, including a
suggestion of a plan for President Hillary Clinton to be the “Disclosure
President.” Of course, that plan failed for the obvious reason. You can listen
to the interview here:
 |
| Stephen Bassett. Photo copyright by Kevin Randle |
In
the last several days, I have had some inquiries about Admiral Thomas Wilson,
who apparently met with Dr. Eric Davis (formerly of NIDS). Davis took notes and
those notes have recently been published in a number of forums. You can read
the notes for yourself here:
Davis
had mentioned, on Coast-to-Coast, that the Del Rio UFO crash was real,
which seemed to suggest that he wasn’t quite the authority on crash retrievals
that he pretended to be. I discussed some of that here:
The
problem is that the Del Rio crash is a hoax. It was started by a fellow named
Robert Willingham, and I have gone over this many times on the blog. Willingham
claimed to have been a fighter pilot, Air Force officer, and eventually claimed
to have been involved in seven UFO crash retrievals. You can read about all
that here:
(All
of this is probably more detail than anyone really wants, but I believe it
important to make it clear that the Del Rio data came from Willingham and
Willingham is completely unreliable.)
One
of the points I wanted to make, but it got lost in the discussion, was that the
Wilson interview had taken place in 1997, and while they talked about the Corso
book, I didn’t really see that as a fatal flaw. Corso’s book came out that same
year, and if you accept the crash of an alien spacecraft at Roswell as true,
then Corso writing about it suggests that he might have had inside information.
But the flaws in Corso’s book are many and I have written about them here as
well. (Can’t be surprised by that, can you?) The relevant posts can be read
here:
We
ended with a discussion about the convoy from Roswell to Wright Field, Ohio. I
was attempting to point out that it violated regulations… but was told that
regulations were often violated. This is a standard response to such a question
but it doesn’t negate the accuracy of the information. We just ran out of time
before we could finish the discussion.
Next
week, I’ll be joined by Nick Redfern to discuss his book, Cover ups and
Secrets. If you have questions for Nick, send them along to the comments
section and I’ll see about getting them answered.
And,
remember, I’ll be interviewing some of the guests at the Roswell Festival. If
you have questions, the same applies. Send them along to the comments section
here.
2 comments:
How many times have we heard the same drivel about this one or that one being the “disclosure president”? I admire Bassett’s passion and commitment, but there’s rarely an interview where he doesn’t sound ridiculous. The main issue I have with his disclosure ambitions, is that there will probably never be disclosure for folks like Bassett. If Trump was to call a press conference tomorrow and said “Yes, we have made contact with an extraterrestrial civilisation and they have indeed been responsible for some of the highly publicised UFO sightings ....etc”
It would never be enough for people like Bassett, they want all of their UFO beliefs validated whether it be Roswell, Rendlesham, Phoenix lights, Bob lazar’s tales, or even the one armed fraudster who we dare not name incase his bodyguard shows up to annoy us all to death.
Anything less than a validation of their beliefs will be met with cries of things like “fake disclosure” or claims of it being a hoaxed alien invasion of earth with the goal of establishing a “one world government”, the usual drill.
Though I take Sugarraytaylor's point that an official announcent of the reality of visitation (that some UFO's are ET)...will not be enough info for many, it has to start somewhere. I expect ONE of the reasons we have not had disclosure already is that, other than the knowledge that the ETH is accurate, not enough about who they are and what they want is known. Disclosure is going to be a real headache of a job for some poor secretary of state.
Post a Comment