Some time ago I interviewed Robert
Sheaffer about UFOs and I brought up the Levelland landing and EM effects case.
Robert said that four of the witnesses had been discredited. I asked for the
source and he provided it. You can read about all that here:
and here:
and you can listen to the interview
with Robert here:
As you
can see there is some question about the original source of the material. It
seems, based on what I have found, that all four of the mentioned witnesses
were
not discredited. However, there is a problem with one of them. Here’s what
I know about Frank Williams, or more accurately, what Williams was reported to
have said or done:
At about 12:05 a.m. or maybe a few minutes later, Frank B.
Williams, of Kermit, Texas, reported that he had seen a large, egg-shaped
object sitting on the ground. Williams said that his engine quit and his lights
faded immediately. The object was pulsating as it glowed and it seemed that the
lights might have been synced to the pulsation of the craft. He said that every
time the object came on, his car lights would go off.
Williams got out of his car and the object rose to about
200 or 300 feet with a roar like that of thunder. It stopped glowing and
disappeared. When the object was gone the headlights came on and Williams was
able to start his car.
Although it was reported that Williams had actually gone
to the police station to make his report of his sighting, other sources
suggested he had telephoned the police instead. Don Berliner, writing in Official
UFO nearly twenty years later seemed to confirm that Williams had only called
the sheriff rather than visiting him.
Williams, it seems, then fell off the
face of the planet. According to newspaper sources, Sheriff Weir Clem, the
Hockley County sheriff, which included Levelland, wanted to interview Williams the
next day, November 3. Clem asked his counterpart, Winkler County Sheriff L. B.
Eddins, which includes Kermit, to search for Williams. “Eddins said he ‘turned
Kermit upside down’ today, even to having an appeal broadcast on the Kermit
radio station but he was unable to find Williams or any trace of the man having
lived in Kermit.”
What can we deduce from this?
First, it could be suggested that
Williams lied about who he was because he didn’t want people to think he was
crazy, but felt the need to report what he had experienced.
Second, it could be that he lied
about where he was located for the same reason given above.
Third, he might have lied about both
his name and his location for the same reason given above.
Finally, he could have made the whole
thing up for reasons of his own.
Given the timing, that is, Williams
had called the Sheriff just after midnight, there is no way that he could have
heard about the other sightings. They hadn’t made the news at that point.
Unless there had been some discussion over the police radios and Williams was
able to monitor those radios, then his report is independent of the others.
However, that is just not a good
argument for Williams. The sheriff, either Clem or Eddins, couldn’t find the
man, and they had resources that should have allowed them to do it. Although it
seems that Clem did speak with Williams, by the time they were ready to gather
additional information, Williams was gone. We have nothing more on which to
judge his tale or his credibility.
That, of course, does not negate the
other three witnesses that were named with Williams, nor those who interviewed
by the Air Force, law enforcement officers or by various newspapers. Those
other three specifically, Long, Wheeler and Alvarez, hadn’t disappeared as had
Williams.
What might have happened is that the
information about Williams, which was published and which suggested he might
not have existed or had been involved in some sort of a prank, suggested that
others might not have been real as well. Long, for example, was from Waco,
Texas, several hundred miles from Levelland, though he was attending college in
Lubbock. Given that he didn’t tell his story until the next day, suggested the
possibility of contamination. The Sheriff accepted Long’s report as real.
Anyway, we can, if we wish, eliminate
Williams from the mix or assign a lower importance to it, but that in no way
negates all the other stories that have been told about the Levelland case.
Yes, this has taken us deep into the weeds, but in the effort to be fair, I
thought I would point out that Williams is sort of a non-witness. It means that
Robert was not completely off base, only that he extended his net a little
farther than the data warranted… And I have discovered a little more about this
aspect of the whole Levelland event.
1 comment:
"Robert said that four of the witnesses had been discredited." - This is somewhat of an admission by Schaeffer, it certainly implies if the witness were credible, that the case is evidence of something extraordinary.
Why go after the witnesses testimony if he had some other explanation for the case?
Post a Comment