Last
Saturday night, (January 18) NewsNation aired a segment that featured Jake
Barber who claimed that he had seen a “nonhuman” egg-shaped aircraft and had
been recruited for a top-secret government UFO crash/retrieval program. Unlike
David Grusch who talked of hearing of such things from credible but unnamed
sources, Barber said that he had participated in retrievals.
I
probably should point out here that neither of these “whistleblowers” was the
first to make claims of an involvement in some sort of government UFO crash
retrieval program. Among the first was Clifford Stone, a mid-level Army NCO,
who claimed to have been involved in several such operations and had even seen
the “alien autopsy file,” not long after he had joined the Army. I mention this
because Stones’ revelations were little more than invention that was not backed
up by any sort of independent evidence.
![]() |
The late Cliff Stone, who claimed to be on the inside of a secret program involved with crash retrievals. |
According
to NewsNation, which had checked Barber’s records, he was a talented airplane
mechanic who was deployed on several presidential support missions. He had been
recruited into the Air Force’s Elite Combat Control unit suggesting he was a
helicopter pilot (though it is unclear if he had been a military pilot),
freefall parachutist, expert marksman and the recipient of a NATO top-secret
security clearance, known as Cosmic Top Secret and service in Bosnia, for which
he earned an unidentified valor award. They don’t reveal what award that might
be. Stones’ records provided no corroboration for his tales.
To
indicate the off-world nature of the retrievals, Barber said, “Just visually
looking at the object on the ground, you could tell that it was extraordinary
and anomalous. It was not human.” The craft was metallic, pearly white, and
about the size of an SUV.
Normally,
I am skeptical of these sorts of claims and I believe we all should be as well.
However, my own experiences in both Air Force and Army intelligence suggests
there might be some truth to it.
Because
of my status in the military, that is as an intelligence officer, and because
some knew of my interest in UFOs, I occasionally received nuggets of
information about UFO cases that haven’t been reported or that have had little
military interest. Bob Cornett and I might have been among the first to gain
access to the Project Blue Book records while they were still housed as Maxwell
Air Force Base and had not been redacted, taking out the names of the
witnesses.
![]() |
Bob Cornett reviewing UFO records while on assignment from a magazine in the 1970s. |
One
of the first cases we wanted to see was from November 1953 that involved the
disappearance of an Air Force fighter. The Blue Book file was just two pages
and it was noted that it was an aircraft accident rather than a UFO report.
According to an Air Force colonel who was stationed at Kinross Air Force Base
said that in November 1953, a jet fighter was scrambled to intercept an unknown
target, meaning a UFO, over the Soo Locks on Lake Superior. The intercept was
watched on radar, the two blips, that is the UFO and the jet, merged but never
separated. That single blip flew off the scope and disappeared in the distance.
From the point of the merge, there had been no further communication with the
fighter. The jet was never found. The colonel told me that there had been two
schools of thought. One was that the UFO abducted the jet and the second was
that it had crashed into the lake.
That
is the sort of thing that I believe David Grusch heard when he talked about UFO
crashes. People who were at the right place at the right time to know something
more than the public provided that information. The colonel believed that the
jet had been abducted, or in his words, the UFO took it. I wasn’t there, but
the source had been. I knew him and he was credible but then where do you go
with such a tale. If it is highly classified, how do I, as a civilian now,
break through that barrier. Besides, attempts to learn more about it, other
than the mundane and unclassified, have failed. I’m pointed back to the
information and documentation that I already had.
In
a somewhat similar vein, Don Schmitt and I interviewed a general at the
Pentagon. Well, interviewed might be an over statement. He agreed to meet us in
a snack bar on one of the lowest levels. The tables were about waist high or
higher, so that people had a place to set a plate, but there were no stools. It
was a get in, get your food, eat it and get out place.
We
wanted to talk about the Roswell case. Don had apparently chatted with him at
some point, explaining what we were after which is information about Roswell.
By this time, we had talked to many witnesses to the crash and knew more about
it. We had rejected the balloon answer and had even interviewed three of those
who had been in General Ramey’s office on July 8, 1947.
We
were inside the Pentagon for about fifteen or twenty minutes. The general
didn’t look nervous. He just told us that there was an area in the Pentagon to
which he had no access. He said that our Roswell information was there. He
didn’t elaborate. Just hinted that highly classified information about Roswell was
in that area, and those entering had to have a specific request and their time
in that area was limited. I would later talk to another man who had said he had
seen the classified version Project Blue Book and described for me. He said he
saw some of the pictures of crashed UFOs and the recovery operations that had
been conducted. I don’t know if these classified Blue Book files were part of
that section of the Pentagon to which the general had referred.
I
have also talked with another general who said he knew the photographer who
photographed Roswell bodies, but didn’t provide very much information about
that. I need to point out that by the time the information got to me, it was
third-hand. The general hadn’t seen the pictures, he had just talked to one of
those men who took them.
I
suppose I should mention the retired MSGT who said that he’d provided the rawin
target for the Roswell explanation. What he had said to Cornett and me, was
that he had taken a balloon into an area to show the witnesses what they had
seen. This was before I had talked with Irving Newton, the weather officer who
identified the wreckage in Fort Worth. He said they didn’t have rawin targets
on the FWAAF, but did know where to get one if it was needed.
The
MSGT was careful about what he told us, but the implication was that he had
taken the balloon around the Roswell area. I have assumed that it was part it
was part of the 1947 cover up, but when Bob and I talked to him, neither of us
knew much about the Roswell case. I had read Frank Edward’s laughable
description of the Roswell case in his Flying Saucers – Serious Business,
but that didn’t contain much information other than it happened near Roswell
and the Air Force had explained it, in Edward’s words, as a pie tin hooked to a
kite.
All these are incidents, in which I was involved to some extent. Like those being talked about today, they suggest that these retrievals do happen. Sometimes the information is limited and we must deduce where it is going. Sometimes it is more explicit. What it does confirm is there was a cover up then and it remains in place now.
22 comments:
Kevin,
There are several indications suggesting that Jake Barber might not be exactly who he claims to be. This Reddit post raises doubts about his statements regarding his military career:
https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/s/FSooJQGsHu
I strongly recommend reading both the post itself and the discussion that has developed in the comments.
Honestly, the more time goes by, the more I am convinced that all the personalities who have emerged in recent years — such as Grusch, Elizondo, Barber, and others — are nothing more than disinformation agents working on behalf of the Pentagon. We constantly see these grand announcements about revelations that are supposed to change the world, yet they always result in absolutely nothing, with a complete lack of solid evidence.
Elizondo claimed that something extremely significant would happen by 2024, yet nothing has happened. The same Elizondo who claimed to have psychic powers but has yet to prove it. Then Grusch stated that he would soon present additional proof to support his previous claims, yet he has completely disappeared. And now we have Barber, who claims that the government possesses psychic agents capable of interfering with UFO propulsion systems and causing them to crash. Seriously, the more I analyze these statements, the more it appears to be a vast and deliberate disinformation campaign.
I believe in extraterrestrial visitation to Earth and I am convinced that certain UFO crashes are real, but the more I look at how the UFO topic has been handled in recent years, the more I am convinced that the government has deliberately used the phenomenon to distract the population while simultaneously using individuals like Grusch, Elizondo, and Barber to spread absurd stories without any evidence whatsoever, in order to make the topic look ridiculous.
In 1999, just before my retirement from the USAF, I had dinner with Col Bill Coleman and a few other gentlemen. Col Coleman described his encounter with a flying disk in broad daylight while he was flying a USAF B-25 in 1955, enroute from Andrews AFB MD to Greenville AFB. Recently I found a video from the late 1980's that featured Col Coleman describing that encounter, and his description of the disk was somewhat different from what he described ten years later, mainly in terms of the size of the disk. Following the encounter, then-Major Coleman had the other men on board the B-25 separately describe what they had observed, and after finding that their observations agreed, filed a Blue Book report. Five years later he was assigned to the Pentagon, working as a Public Information Officer and was told by his boss that he was going to be PIO for project Blue Book. He responded that his boss had best hear of his own UFO experience before making making that decision and related his B-25 encounter. His boss responded tat they had best leave the decision up to the Secretary of the Air Force and took him in to see the SECAF. When he described the 1955 encounter the SECAF responded that he sounded like the most qualified person he could imagine. Then-Major Coleman then used his new access to the Blue Book files to review his own B-25 encounter report - and found that it was not there!
So, we have on one hand, the SECAF himself being utterly unconcerned about a UFO witness serving as official spokesman while "someone else" is removing potentially "explosive" evidence from the official files. That says a great deal about the difficulties of studying this subject. As for the Jake Barber interview, I watched the news piece and it was never quite clear to me just what his specific expertise was, although there may be other classified aspects of his service that may explain that.
Spartacus01
I have said, repeatedly, that the problem with this latest crew of "whistleblowers" is that they provide nothing in the way of evidence. I have published postings here outlining those problems and years after the first of them appeared, we still have no good evidence.
Clifford Stone is not credible. Period.
There's a much simpler explanation. In this modern age of social media influencers, it's possible to make a good living by monetising your followers. No conspiracy, just a money making enterprise by people who are essentially entertainers.
For the record, I have found much more information that seems to cast doubt on Barber's military credentials. There is another Reddit post that shares much more information than the post I previously shared here.
https://www.reddit.com/r/aliens/s/cOFnrLf5Fs
I believe you are correct that the people you mentioned are spreading disinformation and creating new rabbit holes to nowhere. They really have not added much new information, just rewording what most investigators already know. The recent UFO footage is still horrible, and there is better, clearer film of these objects from the Vietnam War, Korea, etc. It's all still just a sophisticated 'look over here' distraction made by those who will always keep the truth a secret. Disclosure is the myth that keeps on giving.
Kevin you say we still have no good evidence of ufo crash retrievals. What in your opinion what constitute "good evidence?" I noticed Barber spent 4 hours giving testimony in a classified congressional meeting about his ufo retrieval story. But as you and others say that is not good evidence which means everything Jesse Marcel Sr and Jr and any other Roswell witness said about Roswell is not good evidence.
I got to around 1:18:40 on the NewsNation video, when they start talking about how loving these aliens are, when I couldn't take any more. This Jake character has a permanently stunned look on his face, like he's having a prostate examination. I could be wrong but my BS detector went into overdrive. Oh, for the days when a whistle-blower told us something we didn't already know...
Louis -
The difference is that we have the names of the Roswell witnesses, we have taped interviews of them and documentation about their status, meaning that they were in Roswell at the right time. If Don and I had said we talked with sources who had inside knowledge of the event but couldn't tell you the names for a variety of silly reasons, then we would be in the same boat.
You can reject the testimonies of the Roswell witnesses if you so desire, but the point is, you know who they are. With this latest crop of whistleblowers, you don't know who their witnesses are and they offer nothing for us to check out.
Kevin -
Why do you say we don't know who the witnesses are in the case of Jake Barber, the whistleblower you say may be saying something truthful? Barber is not a second-hand witness, he is a purported firsthand witness (just like the Roswell witnesses) and Ross Coulthart, the award-winning journalist who interviewed him on tv for three hours has vetted him and has publically interviewed several of his military colleagues who fully vouch for his credibility.
He has purported publically given all the information he can without violating his secrecy oath. He has reportedly given 4 hours of testimony to a Congressional committee in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) in which he supposedly devulged everything. He has supplied a video of the crash retrieval he says he was personally involved in.
If all that is true, (and I am not saying at this point whether it is or not) that still would be "nothing in the way of evidence" as you put it? If not, what would constitute sufficient evidence of UFO crash retrievals in your mind?
Louis -
The difference is that Barber is a single witness to an extraordinary event. There is not corroboration for what h reports. I have said, repeatedly, if Jesse Marcel had been a single witness, his story would have met with the same skepticism as Barber's.
The problem is that we have another man, Coulthart, who vouches for Barber and says that he has talked with others, but we don't know who those others are. When I say we have talked to others about Roswell, we have provided long lists of those who were there, in Roswell, who tended to support one another.
Please excuse my skepticism, but we have to deal with several reported UFO crashes that are no better corroborated (Trinity, Aztec, Kingman, to name three) than this latest claim. Sorry, if I want to step back and see the evidence before leaping on the bandwagon. I fear that we, in the UFO community too often leaps before we know the full story.
I see your point Kevin.
you brought it up, again :)
1. February 1950 a Mr. Davis caused a ruckus after he bragged about having photos of the Aztec saucer while in a Washington D.C. bar called the Covered Wagon. The military investigated. 2. August/September 1950 one L.D. McLaughlin contacted 5th Army HQ in Denver to complain that an individual named Cline offered him 1500.00 for pictures McLaughlin had taken of the Aztec saucer. The military investigated, and in their report one investigator stated that he believed Mr. McLaughlin just might have "taken pictures of it". 3. In 1952 an investigation was begun due to an Airman reporting about a Master Sergeant claiming to know information about the Aztec case. The Commander stated, in the report, that he was afraid there might "...be a leak in the saucer program".
These are just three items in the official documents where Aztec is brought up, with seriousness and concern, by name. This alone is reason to check on this so-called "hoax". The REAL evidence points away from Silas Newton and toward Wilkie Conner and Rudy Fick...who were both erased from the historical record, beginning with a follow up article published by the Kansas City Star, where...according to the publishers at the "Echo"...the "Star" out-right lied, and changed parts of the story, in order to debunk it.
If its all a hoax, why did the military act like mother hens trying to protect her chicks...every time the Aztec story came up?
Thank you and have a great evening
Bob -
Where are the pictures? Isn't all this, at best second hand?
Would the McLaughlin be the same one that later denied the event (in the hotel) because he was drunk?
Did you read the section about Cline in Ramsey's book carefully? I quote, "He (no name given but worked at the Baltimore Sun) explained to me that no ne by the came of Cline worked at the paper in the early 1950s. The next question was: Did anyone work for the paper that would have had an assignment that would have taken him to Denver to buy flying saucer photographs? His reply was 'No way. We would have never sent a guy to Denver to retrieve pictures of a flying saucer for the paper, let alone pay the $1,500 for such, even through flying saucers were a hot topic, and they would have made great copy for the front page.'"
I also wonder if you read my analysis of the Aztec case in "Alien Mysteries, Conspiracies and Cover-Ups." The fact that the Air Force investigated doesn't make the story true. With the Roswell case, we have the testimony of those who participated and not the second hand and possibly faked stories told about Aztec. I'm afraid you're wasting your time on a hoax... but as you say, "Have a nice evening."
Thanks for the reply.
Since I was the one who shared those documents with the Aztec team, I am well aware of what is in the documents. Though Mr. McLaughlin did indeed claim he was drunk, it was McLaughlin that contacted the Army to report the incident with Cline. It was one of the interviewing agents that said he suspected McLaughlin might have taken pictures of it and did not believe the "I am as drunk" story
I had to leave during my last comment. I am not trying to press it, it's simply because I wasn't able to finish my comment.
There wasn't a "sting" to nab Cline. The whole investigation was brought about by McLaughlin himself, when he contacted 5th Army HQ in Denver to complain about this Cline individual . It's an important point because the question immediately is raised as to why the Army even gave a hoot? Why contact the Air Force at all. Who cares if some drunk calls in a silly story? The Army had reasons to take McLaughlin at his word?
Bob -
You really want to go there?
First, I reported in "The Government UFO Files," that an FBI agent had attended a UFO lecture at the Phipps Auditorium in Denver on May 4, 1960. Apparently, it was not part of his assignment and went to the lecture because he heard it advertised on the radio. He filed a report about the lecture. It was apparently a lecture by contactee George van Tassel. Are we now supposed to believe that Van Tassel had something important to say because the FBI attended the lecture?
Second, in 1950, after the publication of "Behind the Flying Saucers," there was a great deal of interest in, well, flying saucers. Now we have report made to the Army about photographs. Given the situation, it would seem that an investigation would be required to ascertain the validity of the tale. That does not translate into evidence for the reality of the tale. It's sort of like the old prospector theorem. You don't expect to find the gold, but you have to look because you might be wrong.
Again...thank you for the reply.
OK...its not quite the same thing. McLaughlin contacted Army 5th HQ. to complain about this Cline guy offering him 1500.00 bucks. Logic alone would dictate the whole episode going like this:
Ring!!..."Army 5th Headquarters, Captain Thomas speaking"
"yes...My name is Mclaughlin and I would like to report that some guy named Cline tried to give me 1500.00 dollars for pictures of the Aztec saucer."
Captain Thomas: "uh.....right....ummmm....well thank you for letting us know Mr. McLaughlin.hahaha I'll make sure to pass that information on to the President" [Laughter heard in background]
And yet, what happens is that the Army contacts District 24 OSI at Lowry to investigate. Lowry was a major Military photographic school. Could it be that McLaughlin had been connected to Lowry? Is that why the Investigator suspected McLaughlin "might have taken pictures of it?"
Why would the OSI agent make such a comment?
Thank you for your long efforts. Your book, The October Scenario began my re-interest in reading and researching this subject. People like you, the late.Ted Phillips and Dr. Rudiak are what has kept me motivated. I don't mean to be irritating to you, or anyone else, but I know something huge had to have taken place on 25 March 1948 for the amount of meetings and emergency to have been declared. Researching that date led me to the proof against that last set of so-called Majestic Documents as well.
Please take care and have a beautiful day.
Post a Comment