Robert Salas and Jim
Klotz were the first to tell the story of Echo Flight, first in an online
article at cufon.org and later in their book, Faded Giant. Robert Hastings, in his UFOs and Nukes, provided additional information. The story they told
started early on the morning of March 16, 1967, when two missile maintenance
teams who had been working on two of the flight’s widely scattered launch
facilities had said they had seen strange lights in the sky near where they
were located. A mobile security team confirmed this, saying they had seen the
lights as well. All of this was told to Colonel Don Crawford by Captain Eric
Carlson and 1st Lieutenant Walt Figel as Crawford came on duty, at
least and according to what Salas had been told during his 1996 taped interview
with Figel. Hastings had been told virtually the same things during his
interviews with Figel.
Malmstrom Air Force Base (for those who can't read) |
About 8:30 a.m., that same morning, as both Carlson and Figel were performing routine checks, the flight’s missiles began to drop off line. Within seconds, though Figel would later suggest it was minutes, all ten missiles were inoperable. In the event of war, they could not have launched. This was a major national security issue and a point that would become important later as the government files are searched.
Hastings wrote,
“Immediately after the malfunctions at Echo, the launch officers ordered two
separate Security Alert Teams to drive to each of the launch facilities where
the UFOs had been sighted. Nevertheless, the maintenance and security personnel
at each site reported seeing UFOs hovering near the missile silos.”
He added, “…some months
after my book came out, in July 2008, I interviewed Figel on tape. He said one
of the two SAT teams reported seeing the UFO over one of the silos. In 1996, he
told Salas that both teams had seen it. A faded memory, it seems…”
But the story wasn’t
quite so mundane, as Hastings learned during his interviews with Figel. When
Hastings talked to Figel, a retired Air Force Colonel on October 20, 2008, he
was told that one of the guards had suggested the UFO had shut down the
missiles. Figel thought the guard was joking. He told Hastings, “I was thinking
he was yanking my chain more than anything else.”
Hastings asked, “He
seemed to be serious to you?”
And Figel responded,
“He seemed to be serious but I wasn’t taking him seriously.”
Hastings wanted to know
what the man had seen and Figel said that it was just a large, round object
that was directly over the launch facility.”
To clarify the
situation Hastings and Figel discussed the security procedures. Figel said,
“[When] the missiles dropped off alert, I started calling the maintenance
people out there on the radio… [I asked] ‘What’s going on?’ … And the guy says,
‘We got a Channel 9 No-Go. It must be a UFO hovering over the site.”
Figel, of course,
didn’t believe him. He said that one of the Strike Teams, they had dispatched
two, but one of them thought they had seen something over the site. They told
Figel that a large object was hovering there.
All of this, of course,
suggests that UFOs were somehow involved with the sudden shut down of the
missile systems. Although the government files reject the idea, there is a
great deal of eyewitness testimony for this.
The maintenance teams were
dispatched and once they had located the problem, they were able to bring the
missiles back on line, but the process was not simple and required hours for
each missile. There was an extensive investigation that involved not only the
Air Force but also the contractors who had designed and built the missiles.
According to the 341st
Strategic Missile Wing Unit History, recovered through Freedom of Information:
On 16 March 1967 at 0845, all sites
in Echo (E) Flight, Malmstrom AFB, shutdown with No-Go indication of Channels 9
and 12 on Voice Reporting Signal Assemble (VRSA). All LF’s in E Flight lost strategic
alert nearly simultaneously. No other Wing I configuration lost strategic alert
at that time.
Guidance & Control channel 50
dump data was collected from E-7 facility and E-3 Facility and all 10 sites
were then returned to strategic alert without any LF equipment replacement. All
10 sites were reported to have been subject to a normal controlled shutdown…
The only possible means that could
be identified by the team involved a situation in which a couple self test
command occurred along with a partial reset within the coupler. This could
feasible cause a VRSA 9 and 12 indication. This was also quite remote for all
10 couplers would have to have been partially reset in the same manner…
In the researching of other
possibilities, weather was ruled out as a contributing factor in the incident.
A check with Communications
maintenance verified that there was no unusual activity with EWO-1 or EWO-2 at
the time of the incident.
All of which, in the
short term, did not explain why the missiles all went off line at virtually the
same time. In other words, at that point they didn’t know why the missiles went
off line. In a very technical aspect of the Unit History, it explains that a
“30 micro sec Pulse… was placed on the Self Test Command (STC) line… Seven out
of 10 separate applications of a single pulse would cause the system to shut
down with a Channel 9 & 12 No-Go.”
Or according to the
government files, a randomly introduced electronic pulse which might be considered
an EMP, which shouldn’t have affected the missile systems, had shut them down.
The point of insertion was apparently the Launch Control Facility, but all
those areas should have been shielded from just such an occurrence.
The information about
the Echo Flight was, quite naturally, communicated to the Condon Committee, and
Dr. Roy Craig responded. Although not exactly government files, Craig was
working on a government contract for the Air Force when he made his notes on
his meeting with Lieutenant Colonel Chase at Malmstrom. Craig’s notes on the
meeting said:
After Colonel Chase and I exchanged
pleasantries in his office, I asked him about the Echo incident. The Colonel
caught his breath, and expressed surprise that I knew of it. ‘I can’t talk
about that’… If I needed to know the cause of this incident, I could arrange
through official channels, to see their report after the completion of the
investigation… Although local newspapers carried stories of UFO sightings which
would coincide in time with Echo, Colonel Chase had assured me that the
incident had not involved a UFO… I accepted the information as factual and
turned review of Major Schraff’s report (on the Echo incident) over to Bob Low
[Dr. Robert Low, also a member of the Condon Committee], who had received
security clearance to read secret information related to the UFO study… Low, in
turn, had to interface with his Air Force Liaison in Washington, Col. Hippler
[Lieutenant Colonel Robert Hippler]…. [Low wrote to Craig] ‘Roy, I called
Hippler and he said he would try to get this, but he suspects it’s going to be
classified too high for us to look at. Says he thinks interference by pulses
from nuclear explosions is probably involved.
So, it seems that a
cause had been found, or rather it seemed to have been found, but the ultimate
source of the pulse was not identified. Hippler, speculating about the source
of the pulse came up with an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) from a nonexistent atomic
blast. That the pulse shut down all the missiles made it a national security
issue, which changed the level of the classification.
Oddly, in the 341st
SMW Unit History, it noted, “Rumors of Unidentified Objects (UFO) around the
area of Echo Flight during the time of the fault were disproven. A Mobile
Strike Team, which had checked all November Flight’s LFs [Launch Facilities] on
the morning of 16 March 67, were questioned and stated that no unusual activity
or sightings were observed.”
But that doesn’t seem
to be quite accurate. Hastings interviewed James Ortyl who had been assigned as
an Air Policeman at Malmstrom. Ortyl said:
I was an Airman 2nd
Class [A2C] at the time. We were working the day-shift at Kilo Flight in March
of 1967… It was mid-morning and three or four Air Policemen were gathered in
the launch control facility dispatch office. Airman Robert Pounders and I were
facing the windows looking out to the yard and parking lot. The others were
facing us. As we were conversing, I witnessed a shimmering, reddish-orange
object clear the main gate and in a sweeping motion pass quickly and silently
pass by the windows. It seemed to be within 30 years of the building. Stunned,
I looked at Pounders and asked, “Did you see that?!” He acknowledged that he had.
To be fair, Ortyl
didn’t know the exact date, but said that in was near his birthday of March 17th.
But then there is Craig’s interview with Chase which also moves in the
direction of UFO sightings on the proper date. Craig’s notes indicate that he had
the names of some of those involved with the UFO sightings at the time of
Echo’s shut down, but he never contacted any of them.
Craig also had the name
of Dan Renualdi who, in March 1967, was a member of the Site Activation Task
Force (SATAF). He said that he had been within a few feet of an object. There
was also a sergeant with the Air Force Technical Evaluation Team who said he
had seen a flying saucer. There is no record of Craig talking to either of
these men, nor are there any reports in the Project Blue Book files to suggest
that the sightings had been reported there. That was a violation of the
regulations in force at the time, although it could be argued there were
contradictory regulations.
All this demonstrates
is that there was another reported UFO around the time that Echo Flight had
gone down, contrary to what the Unit History said. It does not prove that the
UFOs had anything to do with the anomalous pulse.
There is another aspect
to this. Quite naturally, the Air Force wanted to know what had happened. The
man who conducted the investigation for Boeing, the Defense Contractor for the
missile systems was Robert Kaminski. In a letter dated February 1, 1997 to Jim
Klotz, he wrote:
At the time of the incident, I was
an engineer in the MIP/CNP (Material Improvement Project/Controlled Numbered
Problem) group…. The group was contacted by the Air Force so that Boeing could
respond to specific Air Force Minuteman Missiles problems that occurred in the
field…
I was handed the E-Flight CNP assignment
when it arrived by the group supervisor. As the internal Boeing project
engineer I arranged meetings necessary with management and technical personnel
required to determine a course of action to be taken, in exploring why 10
missiles had suddenly fallen from alert status – green – to red, with no
explanation for it. This was an unusual request and we had no prior similar
incident or experience to this kind of anomaly….
Since this was a field site
peculiar incident, a determination was made to send out an investigative team
to survey the LCF and the LFs to determine what failures or related incidents
could be found to explain the cause…. After a week in the field the team
returned and pooled their data. At the outset the team quickly noticed a lack
of anything that would come close to explain why the event occurred. There were
no significant failures, engineering data or findings that would come close to
explain how ten missiles were knocked off alert. This indeed turned out to be a
rare event and not encountered before. The use of backup power systems and
other technical system circuit operational redundancy strongly suggests that
this kind of event is virtually impossible once the system was up and running
and on line with other LCF’s and LF’s interconnectivity….
The team met with me to report
their findings and it was decided that the final report would have nothing
significant in it to explain what happened at E-Flight. In other words there
was no technical explanation that could explain the event… Meanwhile I was
contacted by our representative… (Don Peterson) and told by him that the
incident was reported as being a UFO event – That a UFO was seen by some Airmen
over the LCF at the time E-Flight when down.
Subsequently, we were notified a
few days later, that a stop work order was on the way from OOAMA to stop any
further effort on this project. We stopped. We were also told that we were not
to submit the final engineering report. This was most unusual since all of our
work required review by the customer and the submittal of a final Engineering
report to OOAMA…
However, as I recall nothing
explained this anomaly at E-Flight.
Hastings, in a review
of the material in 2013, wrote, “Actually, the large
round object sighted by the missile guard, and reported to launch officer Lt.
Walter Figel, had been hovering over one of the Echo missile silos, not the
launch control facility itself. Nevertheless, Boeing engineer Kaminski’s
revealing testimony essentially confirms Figel’s account of a UFO presence during
the incident.”
This all happened while
the University of Colorado study, known as the Condon Committee was going on,
and an investigator from Colorado arrived at Malmstrom AFB to learn what had
happened. Dr. Roy Craig, was dispatched to meet with Chase. Once Craig was in
Chase’s office, rather than ask about the sightings around Belt, Craig asked
about Echo Flight.
Craig wrote, “The
Colonel caught his breath, and expressed surprise that I knew of it. He said,
“I can’t talk about that.”
Craig turned the
investigation over to Robert Low, who had been granted a security clearance so
that he could read the classified information in the Project Blue Book files.
That wasn’t good enough and they eventually made the request to Lt. Col. Robert
Hippler who was involved with the Colorado study, and had, at one point, told
Low and Condon what the Air Force expected in the study. You can read more
about that here:
Hippler wrote back that
it was his opinion that the Echo Flight trouble was classified too high for
them to see it. He didn’t explain what that classification might be, but here
was a case in which UFOs were involved, even if that involvement was tangential
to the problem with Echo Flight.
In fact, they were told
that there was no UFO involvement, but the trouble with Echo Flight was a
matter of national security. Here’s the point, it was believed impossible for
all ten missiles in a single flight to be disabled by an outside force. There
was redundancy built into the system. Ignoring the fact that UFOs might have
come into play, what was important here was that an outside force had disabled
the missiles. If the enemy learned that such a thing was possible, then that
enemy could begin to search for a way to do it. UFOs could lead to that
discovery, even if those UFOs weren’t alien in origin… and there it is. The
reason that we have not gotten further is National Security. That is why,
today, we still don’t have any real answers from the government. And if you’re
arguing that this is old news, then I remind you that Area 51 was exposed
during UFO investigations. They conceal the information because they believe
they’re protecting National Security. I’ve laid all this out and provide addition
information about the missile intrusions in the book The Government UFO
Files.
3 comments:
A friend who worked Minuteman missile maintenance at FE Warren AFB in the late 60's and early 70's said that having one missile after another shut down is a well known failure mode. If the timing signal being sent out fails then each system will drop off line when it realizes that the timing signal is gone.
RWE -
Which is all well and good, except at Malmstrom, they were unable to find a cause. I have information from others including an officer who served at Warren AFB in Cheyenne, WY, who associated the failure of the missiles systems to a UFO sighting. But the real point, and I discussed this in one of my books, is that an outside force was able to degrade the capability to launch the missiles, and that makes it a national security issus.
RWE: In the book "Faded Giant" by Salas and Klotz, it's stated the companies who actually installed the electrical systems of the silos, after a rather lengthy on-site investigation, could not determine the actual cause of the UFO related failure. Was your friend in the USAF or did he work for a contractor? Seemingly, the contractors, as well as the USAF itself, would have been aware of a "well known failure mode".
Post a Comment