(I will note that arguments made by these two people do not seem to address the evidence that removes Flight #4 from the story. We have documents to prove that Flight #4 never flew but this idea seems to have taken over. Too many sources have accepted that solution for Roswell without critical review. I have looked at some of this in the following. David Rudiak has posted comments to the original article, covering some of the same evidence. David proves links to his website and I suggest that those who wish a detailed explanation should look at Appendix C in Roswell in the 21st Century.)
Gilles –
I
am getting tired of your insults. You are suggesting that I’m lying to my
readers. You wrote, “As (usual now ?), you are not saying the true to your
readers.”
I
don’t know what other conclusion I can draw. I also realize that there is no
evidence that I can cite suggesting that what was going on in New Mexico was
unclassified that you will ever accept. I do not know what you mean by, “In
Mogul (top secret 1A classified), only the obtained scientific dataes and how
the devices are arranged were classified top secret 1A.”
But
here’s the thing. You do not publish photographs of this alleged top-secret
equipment on the front pages of newspapers. The Soviet spies wouldn’t have to
do anything, other than buy a newspaper… and there were dozens of newspapers,
on July 10, 1947, that published pictures of the New York University balloon
project, which was the experiments to create a constant level balloon.
Can
I tie this to those launches? Of course, there is a ladder in the center
picture. Charles Moore told me that he had bought that ladder with petty cash.
This proves the connection and negates the claim that what was happening in New
Mexico was top secret. What you have failed to do is separate the ultimate goal
of spying on the Soviets, which was top secret, from the experiments in New
Mexico, which were unclassified.
The
idea that the purpose was highly classified was the reason for the
extraordinary efforts to recover every little scrap of the material scattered
over two separate sites. If you have read Albert Crary’s diary notes, and the
Technical Report 1 that you insist on citing, you see that in no other case
were such measures were applied. They just didn’t care about the recovery and
in one case noted that the terrain was too rough for recovery… or, in still another
case Crary, with the remains of a balloon in the rear of his weapons carrier,
actually stopped at Roswell Army Air Field to refuel… As an aside, Moore
claimed that two weeks later, in a similar circumstance, he was turned away
from the base and had to refuel elsewhere, which is another of his lies.
The
point is that thee experiences, based on the documentation, not to mention some
of my discussions with Moore, prove that what was happening in Alamogordo was
NOT classified.
I
don’t know how to make this more evident. Maybe by pointing out that there were
no classification markings on any of the documentation, which there would have
been if the reports and all had been classified. Once they were declassified,
there would have a red pencil mark drawn through the classification, or they
would have been redacted completely.
What
nonsense are you now going to spout, with invented claims… remember, you
cautioned that I don’t mention Linda Corley (yes, I have slightly changed gears
here) making some absurd claim that Friedman had heard the tapes. Were you
suggesting (a) that it was Friedman who originally recorded the tapes or (b)
that after Corley loaned them to him that he altered them? Just what were you
suggesting without a shred of evidence?
So,
what the newspapers PROVE is that what was happening in Alamogordo was
unclassified. The mere act of publishing those pictures, with military
cooperation, prove the balloon project was unclassified.
I
point out that you accept everything that suggests what fell was the remains of
a balloon and reject everything else which doesn’t seem to be a proper
skeptical attitude. So, I ask you, what time was Flight #4 launched… Charles
Moore has provided two or three answers.
Just
wondering.

Bamm
Bamm Bahama
Although
David Rudiak has covered some of the following points, I will expand on all
that. First, let me say that I do like the form of your analysis. It is the
sort of analysis I was taught to do when I studied for my masters in
Intelligence. But there are a couple of flaws that render your conclusion badly
flawed.
You
begin with a few key points about the photographs in General Ramey’s office. I
won’t go over those points because there is nothing wrong with what you wrote,
though I might argue that the real debris had not been fully collected and
moved by the time the photos were taken. I base this on the timeline and the
suggestion that collecting the material would have taken longer. This is based
on the testimony of several of those who collected the debris after Marcel
returned to Roswell late on July 7.
You
conclude that the pictures were taken for consumption rather for documentation.
I would agree with this.
You
then ask, ‘Why stage them?” And this is the first assumption made that is in
error. I will split a fine hair here, and say again, that the purpose of
Project Mogul was to spy on the Soviets, but the balloon flights in New Mexico
were not highly classified. Charles Moore made a point of saying that the
balloon flights were to develop a constant level balloon array. Such an array
could have all sorts of scientific purposes other than spying on the Soviets.
And, I’ll point out that the Japanese had developed a balloon borne weapon
during the Second World War that suggested a military application. They used
their constant level balloons to bomb the US. They launched some 9000 of them,
and nearly 300 reached the US. Six people in Oregon were killed by one of those
balloon bombs.
You
suggest that photographs of the arrays would provide the Soviets with
intelligence that would allow them to deduce acoustic detection methods and reveal
radar reflector design. Except the rawin radar reflectors had been used since
the end of the war and were used by weather stations all over the US. That
seemed to negate one of your premises.
You
write, “So yes—showing “nothing to see here, just a weather balloon” was
textbook counter-intelligence. The goal wasn’t fooling Americans; it was not
educating Soviet scientists who were absolutely reading U.S. newspapers.”
The
problem here is that you do not account for the pictures published on July 10
in newspapers all around the country. It is the reason I posted the Alamogordo
News article about the balloon arrays, including very specific pictures.
Those pictures were also meant to fool the public but also revealed some of the
intelligence you suggest they would want to conceal.
You
suggest that had such a crash be alien, would we expect follow-up or
reconnaissance craft?
Just
for the sake of argument, had it been alien in nature, we have no real idea
what they would do. What we would do in a similar circumstance is not
necessarily what another sentient lifeform would do. We can guess but we cannot
logically deduce anything about their reactions without some knowledge about
them and their societies.
But
I’m going to the biggest flaw in your analysis and that is the reliance on
Mogul Flight #4. If it never flew, then that negates your analysis. Dr. Crary’s
diary showed the flight was cancelled. Yes, there was a cluster of balloons
flown later, but that was a cluster and not an array. The documentation
available tells up how those clusters were made.
Your
analysis does not allow for two crash sites. The Debris Field found by Mack
Brazel is one. There are multiple witnesses to that site. Bill Brazel said
there was a gouge down the center, indicating that something had hit and then
bounced. Charles Moore said that if there was a gouge, then their balloon
arrays would not account for that evidence.
The
second site, closer to Roswell, was first discussed with us by Bill Rickett,
the NCOIC of the CIC in Roswell. He did not see the Debris Field, but was taken
to a site about 45 to 60 minutes from Roswell.
He
is not the only witness to that second site. Brigadier General Arthur Exon told
us about the two sites that he had flown over. If there were two sites, then a
balloon array is eliminated.
I
could to other flaws in your analysis such as the radar coverage in that are in
July 1947 was spotty at best. Nothing was monitoring 24/7 and the closest of
those radars were at White Sands.
So,
where are we? Unfortunately, I must agree with your conclusion, or rather
modify it. If we eliminate Mogul as a viable explanation, then we have no other
terrestrial explanation for the debris. We can say that the only conclusion
left is the extraterrestrial. To quote Sherlock Holmes, “"When you have
eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the
truth."
(Bottom Line: If there was no Flight #4, then there was no balloon to drop
debris on the Brazel (Foster) ranch, and if there was no balloon debris, then
what was found? If there was a gouge down the center of the debris as described
by Bill Brazel and Judge Bud Payne, then, as Charles Moore said, it was not one
of their balloons. If there were two sites, as mentioned by Bill Rickett and
confirmed by General Arthur Exon, then Mogul is eliminated as the culprit. If the
debris was as described, meaning the metal that could be folded and would
unfold itself assuming its original shape, then Mogul is not the answer. I just
mention these things that have been ignored in this discussion.)

No comments:
Post a Comment