The
much-anticipated book by Dr Jacques Vallee and Paola Harris, Trinity: The
Best Kept Secret, finally dropped and we now have a very good idea of what
is in it. The publicity running up to the publication suggested that we’d learn
about a UFO crash that preceded Roswell by two years and was based on the
eyewitness testimony of two men and as a surprise or special element, we’d
learn of a third witness to these incredible events.
 |
| Dr. Jacques Vallee |
The
story as told, and outlined on this blog just a few weeks ago, was that two
boys, ages 7 and 9, not only found a crashed object that didn’t resemble any
Earth-based aviation technology, but they had seen the crash. There was a hint
that it might have been brought down by lightning in one of those strong
thunderstorms that frequent New Mexico in the late summer or it hit a tower
that caused it to crash. For those who want to see that earlier post, you can
read it here:
http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2021/05/the-san-antonio-ufo-crash.html
The
boys, identified as Reme Baca and Jose Padilla, had approached the area
cautiously and saw, not only the ruined craft, but small creatures that seemed
to teleport from one position to another. Those beings provided telepathic
pictures to the boys, who lingered in the area for longer than they should.
 |
| Ms. Paola Harris |
Back
at the ranch house, in San Antonio, New Mexico, they told family about what
they had seen. There was no immediate follow up, but a day or so later, the
fathers and a New Mexico State Policeman, made their way to the scene of the
crash. Although the boys were told to stay back, the adults approached the
craft. One or two of them might have crawled up inside. Today that makes no
real difference because none of those adults are alive for interviews or to
confirm the story.
There
was no sign of the small creatures when the adults made it to the crash site.
Speculation is that they might have been captured by the Army, but I suppose,
it is equally possible that they were rescued by their fellow aliens. At any
rate, the beings disappear from the story and are never heard of again.
The
military arrived at some point. Eventually, they asked permission to cut a
fence and install a gate and to cut a road across the ranch to the area of the crash.
The boys, hiding from the military, kept a watch on this. The boys talked of
the soldiers’ attempts to clean up the debris. Although the soldiers collected all
of the debris, it seems they kicked pieces of it aside and dumped it into
crevasses. They covered this with a thin layer of dirt meaning that it might be
found in the world today… maybe.
Although
the Army was interested enough in the crash to recover the vehicle, they seemed
to be less than enthusiastic in protecting the find. Once they had brought in
the flatbed truck to move the wrecked vehicle from the scene, the soldiers departed,
apparently going into town for a meal or two. In other words, they left the
truck, the spacecraft, the debris and everything else unguarded.
The
boys, having spied on the soldiers, understood their routine and once the site
was abandoned, they wandered down to the blue-tarp-covered object sitting on
that unguarded flatbed. Now, Jose, apparently the more adventurous of the two,
peeled back part of that blue tarp and crawled up into the UFO. He stole a bit
of a panel from inside and explored part of the craft. These descriptions were
overly detailed, and not really what would you expect from someone who was 9 at
the time, telling the tale decades later. Very detailed but probably not
precise.
The
boys carried away a great deal of the debris. If I understood the story, some
of that debris, thin strips of metal that is reminiscent of the memory metal
described by Bill Brazel of Roswell fame, was divided up and handed out as
decorations for Christmas trees… a fairly cavalier way to treat samples of
metal created on another planet. At this point, meaning here in 2021, all that
material has disappeared so that there is nothing left that can be tested and analyzed.
Eventually,
the Army drove the tarp-covered UFO from the area, and life returned to normal,
or as normal as it could be after seeing an alien spacecraft. Neither Reme nor
Jose talked much about it in the decades that followed.
Or
rather they did mention it once in a great while. Don Schmitt told me, during
his recent appearance on the A Different Perspective Radio Show/Podcast,
that he’d met with Reme in the late 1990s after some presentation that Don had
given. Don lost interest when Reme mentioned the Plains of San Agustin as the
location of the crash, suggesting some sort of confirmation of the Barney
Barnett tale.
That
isn’t the only worrisome part of the story the boys told and that is the
cavalier way the Army operated. I simply do not believe that the Army would go
to the trouble of cleaning the area, but bury some of the debris on site rather
than picking it up to be taken away. I don’t believe they would have left the scene
unguarded at all, but especially after they had loaded the craft onto the
flatbed truck… and knowing that Army trucks, as most Army vehicles, do not use
keys to start them. I can believe that the boys were clever enough to avoid
detection by the soldiers as they spied on the operation from a distance, but I
do not believe they were allowed to get inside the craft after it had been
loaded on the truck. By allowed, I mean that the truck was left in the field
without any guard on it. The soldiers might not have known the craft came from
another world, but they would have known that it represented a technology
unknown to American science at the time. That alone would have demanded an
around the clock guard detail.
Two
points need to be made here. Don was not the only UFO researcher to be
approached with the story of the crash. In the book, Vallee and Harris note
that Baca had also sought out Stan Friedman who seemed to be equally
uninterested… and second, Don might have misunderstood about the location on
the Plains. Seems that those living in San Antonio referred to the area around
the town as the Plains as well. At any rate, neither Stan nor Don followed up
on this bizarre tale.
But
the Vallee/Harris book is about more than just the San Antonio crash. There is
a section that deals with some of the other events concerning UFOs and crashes.
The first is the Aurora, Texas, crash of April 1897. This is quite disturbing
because of the history involved. I have written about this case a number of
times. I was among the very first to visit Aurora in the early 1971. The
consensus of those living there, at that time, was the story was a hoax. Those
at the Wise County Historical Society (Aurora is in Wise County) told me that
two histories of the county had been written in the decade that followed this
alleged crash but neither history mentioned it. Since there was no Air Force or
CIA to suppress the information, you have to wonder why, if it was a real
event, that any mention of it was omitted in both those histories. That doesn’t
bode well for the Aurora tale. You can read more about my investigation here:
http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2005/03/aurora-texas-story-that-wont-die.html
http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2018/12/jefferson-airship-vs-aurora-crash.html
http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2013/09/ufo-crashes-fifty-years-before-roswell.html
There
is one additional comment to make. According to the Vallee/Harris book, a piece
of metal picked during one of the modern treks to the crash site up in Aurora
was scientifically tested. The tests showed that it was made of an alloy that
did not exist in 1897 and wouldn’t be created until 1908. Seems like a bit of
extraordinary evidence, except the fragment was recovered much later than 1908.
Nothing ties it to the 1897 event, other than it was found somewhere around
Aurora. Obviously, it was dropped sometime after 1908.
It
is also disturbing that Vallee and Harris take the Maury Island hoax as
something authentic. That story, actually investigated in depth by the Air
Force, as well as many others, is also a hoax. Although Vallee/Harris
acknowledge the hoax explanation, they also wonder how “…any such statement can
be drawn by the reported facts.”
This
statement is in error. I have looked at the Maury Island case extensively, and
you can read about that in Alien Mysteries, Conspiracies and Cover-ups.
The story has been well researched by a number of investigators. George Earley
was one of those and reported his findings in UFO, issues 155, 156 and
157. According to Earley, Harold Dahl’s son, Charles, who was supposed injured
during the sighting was interview years later and said that it never happened.
A search for medical records to verify the injury failed to find any mention of
it.
In
other words, the reported facts in the Maury Island case, all of them, support
Ed Ruppelt’s statement in his book The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects.
Ruppelt described the Maury Island event as the direst hoax in UFO history. No
evidence has been presented to reverse Ruppelt’s observation.
More
problems develop in the discussion of the Socorro UFO landing. I was intrigued
to learn that Lonnie Zamora was related, by marriage into the Padillo family.
His cousin married Zamora, which connects them to another big UFO event in New
Mexico. This is not to mention that Socorro is about fifteen or twenty miles
from San Antonio.
For
years researchers have suggested the Zamora case was single witness to the UFO
landing. Vallee and Harris wrote that there were eleven witness who saw the
object and two who were “auditory” witnesses, meaning they’d heard the roar but
saw no object. The problem is that none of these witnesses are identified with
the exception of Paul Kies and Larry Kratzer. The two men had told a reporter
in Dubuque, Iowa, that they had been driving through Socorro about the time
that Zamora was engaged with the UFO. They saw the thing take off in a cloud of
dust and smoke.
The
trouble here is that their stories just do not fit into the Socorro scenario.
Kies said that there had been a large burned area in the desert and that the
exhaust had melted a pop bottle. He couldn’t have seen these things given they
were just driving through Socorro and hadn’t stopped to inspect the site. More
importantly, the melted pop bottle description was from a sighting near La Madera,
New Mexico, a day or so later, which also received some national attention.
Ralph
DeGraw, an Iowa UFO researcher, interviewed both witnesses some years later.
While what they said then generally agreed with the account in the newspaper,
DeGraw found some important discrepancies, including Kratzer’s description of
the craft. He said that it was silver with a row of dark round, mirror-like
windows. This was a major departure from Zamora’s description that had no
windows and suggests invention by the witness.
One
of the other points of disagreement about the case is the description of the
symbol seen by Zamora. Ray Stanford identified the “real” symbol reported by
Zamora. The trouble here is that the symbol, three horizonal lines through an
inverted “V” is not the symbol that Zamora drew for the military, nor is it the
one that he drew on the scrap of paper moments after the UFO departed. While
Vallee and Harris endorse the inverted “V”, Zamora, on the scrap of paper, drew
an “umbrella” like symbol with an inverted “V” under it and a line, like the
shaft of an arrow, up into the “V”. That scrap of paper was turned over to the
Air Force and can be seen in the Project Blue Book file.
 |
| Zamora's drawing on the scrap of paper minutes after the UFO disappeared. |
Ironically,
that symbol was originally endorsed by Stanford in a letter dated May of 1964.
He wrote that the inverted “V” was the fake symbol. In the years from writing
that letter to writing his book, he changed his mind. But Zamora, on the night
of the sighting, drew a number of illustrations for both the FBI and the Army
and he signed them. The “umbrella” symbol was the one he signed.
 |
| Lonnie Zamora's drawing of the craft and the symbol made on April 24, 1964 |
In
the end here, Stanford said there were eleven witnesses other than Zamora, but
offers no names. Vallee and Harris repeat this without names, other than Kies
and Kratzer, whose tale has been discredited. Vallee wrote that a single
witness is no witness. I would suggest that an anonymous witness, or even
nearly a dozen anonymous witnesses are of absolutely no value and worth less
than that single witness. In 1964, no one bothered to get the names or tried to
locate any of these witnesses. Now we are again treated to the information about
a UFO sighting but that information has no real value.
The
final chapters of the book are devoted to this new witness to the San Antonio
crash promoted by Vallee and Harris. At the end of the book, they identify her
as a relative of Padillo. The problem? She was born in 1953 or eight years
after the sighting. She talks about handling some of the debris, but the piece,
or pieces, she had been given, are long gone. She talked about family stories,
but she witnessed nothing first hand other than a large burned area that might
have had nothing to do with the original crash. She is emersed in the family
history, she is aware of UFO history, but can’t contribute much of value to the
story.
Here’s
one of the things to take away from this latest book. Both Baca and Padillo
talk about many aspects of the UFO field. They talk about knowing people at the
Foster ranch near Corona where Mack Brazel discovered a field of metallic
debris. We have the family relation to Zamora which suggests more infusion of
UFO material into the family lore. Then, we have many aspects of the Roswell
case inserted into this new tale. The UFO crashed during a storm, as was
suggested at Roswell. Lightning brought it down, as happened at Roswell, but I
wonder that if a race can create interstellar craft, they would be able to
avoid destruction by lightning. There was memory metal and even a discussion of
fiber optics, just like Roswell.
The
big thing that caught my attention was a description that suggested the aliens
looked something like the Jerusalem Cricket… the very description supplied by
Frankie Rowe when talking about the aliens at Roswell. There are just too many
of the descriptions that are drawn from the Roswell case. To me, this suggests
contamination rather than corroboration. It suggests that both men were well
aware of the UFO field long before they began to talk of their childhood experiences.
They had a better than average knowledge of what had been reported about UFOs
and UFO crash/retrievals before they began talking about the UFO crash near San
Antonio.
To
make this worse, if possible, it is claimed that this tale of a crashed spacecraft
is the first in our modern era. This, however, isn’t true. In the Spring of
1941, there are reports of something crashing near Cape Girardeau, Missouri.
The tale is told by one woman who, while she didn’t witness the craft and
bodies herself, is aware of what her grandfather had seen and had done. She is
well-versed in the family history. Len Stringfield laid out the details in one
of his updates to crash/retrievals, this one published in 1991. There is
another witness who knows the story including the brother of the local sheriff and
even the report of a picture of one of the alien beings. Of course, that
picture has been lost, but the evidence for the Cape Girardeau crash as just as
solid as that for the Trinity crash. For some reason it is not mentioned in the
Vallee and Harris book. I mention this only because it suggests a long history
of UFO crash tales that are based on limited eyewitness testimony and family
members who died long before they could be interviewed. And they are told in
the same era, that is, the 1940s.
All
this and I haven’t even touched on the structure of the book. It is filled with
oat meal. This is a writing term that refers to filling to make a story longer.
Sure, I enjoyed reading about some of the history of the creation of the atomic
bomb, but it has no relevance to this story. The fact that the first nuclear
explosion took place at Trinity, not all that far from San Antonio means
nothing… unless you believe that the aliens had been watching for that flash
everyone talked about. Of course, you have to wonder where they were to have
seen that and gotten here so quickly. It matters not what their technology can
do, the speed of light is the limiting factor. Even if these aliens can exceed
the speed of light, or bend the universe to allow interstellar flight, the
flash of the bomb would only travel at the speed of light. If the aliens could
detect such a flash against the backdrop of the sun and if it happened on the
side of the planet facing them, the fastest they could have detected the
explosion is about four years afterward, if they inhabited a planet in the
Alpha Centuri star system. If they live in another star system, then their
response would take even longer.
Ignoring
that, we still have a book filled with a family history that does nothing to
validate the story. It is a travelogue. It is a walk though some of UFOs
greatest hits, many of which have little in the way of evidence to back them
up. And even if these ancillary tales were all true, that does nothing to
validate this particular story.
It
is filled with a wonder of the events but little in the way of analysis. It
tells the story of two boys who seemed to have been wise beyond their years,
able to avoid the Army which failed at even the barest level of security. We
are told of soldiers who were lazy, not picking up all the debris, but hiding
from their superiors. That debris would still be there for UFO hunters to find
except is now beyond recovery. Flood control projects that altered the terrain significantly
and buried the debris under twenty or thirty feet of mud and dirt. No way to
find it now.
This
is certainly much longer than I anticipated, but we need to understand what we
have here. It isn’t a scientific search for evidence but more of science
fiction story told for entertainment. There is no physical evidence presented but
talk of such evidence just out of our reach. There is no real attempt to
validate the story or provide citation for the claims. It is a story that has
borrowed elements from other tales in the hope it will be seen as corroboration
rather than plagiarism. Oh, I don’t mean that either Vallee or Harris stole the
story from others, only that the witnesses have been contaminated by decades of
UFO tales written about, broadcast and even incorporated into movies. It is too
bad that no one wrote anything down in a letter or a journal in 1945 or 46 but
that’s just too much to hope for. Somehow the alleged evidence is never found and,
in the end, we are left with a tale told by two old men, and one old woman, who
said they experienced it as youngsters.
