MUFON,
or some members of MUFON, have come up with a list of what they think of as the
one hundred top books about UFOs published over the last seventy years or so.
There are some things wrong with that list that I thought I would mention,
which is, of course, my opinion of what is wrong. You can see their list here:
The
first three books on this list were written by George Adamski (one with Desmond
Leslie) and that makes me wonder about this. Adamski was the contactee who
claimed communication with people of Venus. Tall, good looking people who
apparently were worried about Earth and our warlike ways. In the 1950s and
1960s when the contactees were in their heyday, Venus was seen as a world somewhat
similar to Earth except the surface was hidden in a perpetual cloud bank that
suggested a steamy, jungle-like, swampy planet. Today we know the surface is
hot enough to melt lead and doesn’t seem to be the likely home of any living
creatures, let alone an advanced race capable of interplanetary flight. This
would mean that Adamski wasn’t honest in his descriptions of Venus or in his
communication with the inhabitants… his book might have been influential but it
was complete fiction. Should it actually be on a serious list?
Adamski
is not the only contactee represented here. Dan Fry, or should I say Doctor Dan
Fry and his The White Sands Incident
is on the list. Frank Stranges, or should I say Dr. Frank Stranges, is there
with his Stranger at the Pentagon.
I’m not sure why there are so many books by contactees who claim to have
interacted with alien creatures, usually from other planets in the Solar
System. I have to wonder why George van Tassel was overlooked.
Another
entry that I think is questionable is The
Philadelphia Experience. This is that tale we discussed a while back that
is based on the hoax perpetrated by Carlos Allende or Carl Allen, depending on
his mood. There has been quite a bit written about this, and it was the subject
of several books, but the whole thing started when Allende (or Allen) created
the letters about teleportation and Navy experiments. He even admitted the hoax
and his parents and other family members confirmed the hoax. It seems that this
is the fifth or sixth book of fiction to appear on the list.
This
would be the same complaint about Behind
the Flying Saucers. Though there has been some resurgence in the Aztec UFO
crash, I believe the case has been discredited. Two of the primary sources had
backgrounds that were less than sterling (though I know Frank Warren disagrees
with me on that or at the very least doesn’t believe it disqualifies their
testimony).
I
also wonder why UFOs: God’s Chariots
made the list when Erick von Daniken’s Chariots
of the Gods did not. I mean that if we’re going to credit someone with
creating the whole ancient astronaut theory, it was von Daniken who popularized
this idea though others had reported on this many years before von Daniken hit
the bestseller list.
![]() |
| Don Keyhoe |
Oh,
there are some very good books on the list. David Jacob’s UFO Controversy in America seems to belong. So do the two books by
J. Allen Hynek, The Hynek UFO Report
and The UFO Experience: A Scientific
Inquiry. And let’s not forget Allan Hendry’s The UFO Handbook. Some of Vallee’s books are there, but I wonder if
they might not be overly represented. I think the same thing about Keyhoe’s
books because I worry that some of the information is more speculative than
factual, but then, those books were certainly influential. The same can be said
for the Lorenzen’s though they sometimes let their enthusiasm for the
extraterrestrial cloud their vision.
I
was surprised to see Carl Sagan on the list. His book with Thornton Page, UFOs: A Scientific Debate is properly there
as well. Strangely, Steven Spielberg made the list with Close Encounters of the Third Kind, which is obviously a movie
created for entertainment. The book based on it doesn’t add to our knowledge.
Actually,
this looks more like a list someone prepared of his or her own library of UFO
books. It is an eclectic mix of books that run from those that are clearly
fiction (Adamski and Fry) to those that actually add something to our
knowledge. I don’t know the criterion used to select the books, but it seems
that it wasn’t very strict and probably had more to do with MUFON entering the
book publishing business than anything else.

