(Blogger's note: This is the latest from John Greenewald about the uproar over the Project Blue Book files. Although annoyed at the MSM for not understanding the story and believing that this was something new, I am not annoyed at John for getting the material published at his Black Vault site. It was a service to all of us interested in this. And yes, I have used the Fold 3 site, but then, I do have a complete set of the Project Blue Book files on microfilm. Sometimes it was easier to locate a case at Fold 3 then in the confusing filing system used for Project Blue Book. Anytime information is restricted, for whatever reason, it is a sad day for all of us.)
January
29th, 2015 – It is with great frustration to announce, that Ancestry.com,
and their subsidiary Fold3, has laid down a claim to copyright on the Project
Blue Book material – which has long been labeled as “public domain” by the
National Archives & Records Administration (NARA).
Ancestry.com is
claiming ownership to the digital version of this material – despite me having
records that Fold3 doesn’t even have in their archive and I received under the
FOIA starting back in 1996. They simply claimed it was 100% theirs and I
was forced to remove it.
Because
of my attempt with properly crediting Fold3 with a DIRECT LINK to their site as
partial credit for some of the material, they used that show of proper credit
by me to issue a copyright claim under the Digital Copyright Millennium Act
(DCMA). Anyone who knows anything about the law can attest; you are “guilty
until proven innocent” so this was the beginning of the end. I never hid from
Fold3 as a source, and even brought them up in some media interviews I did take
part in, which were all cut out. No one cared about that part of the story –
this new archive was what they wanted to report on because it was simple,
straight forward, easy and free. And people loved it.
Based on
an evidence-less claim I was forced to remove the entire site. That’s
right, there was ZERO evidence submitted to my web hosting provider of ownership
or copyright or license, but rather, they simply placed the accusation which is
all it takes.
In good
faith, I took the site down in hopes a compromise could be reached. They
already had credit given on the front page of the site for some of the material,
and that link alone resulted in a 12%+ increase in their entire statistics
since they posted records in 2007, and my link multiplied their weekly hits by
10x, yes ten times, in only 5 days (statistics are posted on their page, so I
am not guessing on those statistics but rather took notes).
I stated
there was much more information here than is cited to Fold3, but they didn’t
care. I offered giving them a full 100% “share of voice” banner ad to
advertise Fold3 (in addition to the link already driving them traffic), or to
sell ads with no profit share to me, and they didn’t care. I asked if they
would work with me on any capacity, because CLEARLY interest was being
generated by my audience (and obviously not by theirs) but they didn’t care.
In the
end – they offered I become a member of their affiliate program – and offer a
link to them in exchange for a portion of sales generated. ie: You have to sign
up with them, pay a membership, and they give me a percentage. I quickly
declined. (Blogger's note: So it is clear, there are no fees required for viewing the Project Blue Book files. There is a requirement for membership, but there is no cost there either.)
This is
public record material, and it should remain so. To lay ‘exclusive’ claim to it
in the digital world, when both sites (my site and theirs) offer it for free –
is ludicrous and a waste of time and money for everyone.
But at
the end of the day, I am proud to have brought attention to information that
although has been available for quite some time – the public at large never
knew it existed. I will let Google Trends prove
my point. Here is the popularity of Project Blue Book, since 2005, and a
graph relating to people searching for information on it. (Blogger's note: The graph simply will not print here but there is a tremenous spike in traffic just as John has suggested.)
I am proud to be the one who
caused such an uproar of interest by the public and the media (despite some
erroneous facts in the reporting).
Did some
media outlets misreport? Yes, and if this page was still up, there was a
message on the front page setting the record straight.
But, call
it corporate greed, a legal loophole, or a grey area in the copyright law, all
of that is gone in the name of getting your personal information, and your
credit card, by a corporation that has a wallet much thicker than mine. I’ll
let you decide what the right label is to put on this entire mess.
Does all
of this upset you? Me too! And I invite you to express your thoughts to Ancestry.com,
Fold3, and anyone else you’d like to express your disappointment:
Fold3
355 South 520 West
Suite 250
Lindon, UT 84042
Ph 1-800-613-0181
support@fold3.com
Suite 250
Lindon, UT 84042
Ph 1-800-613-0181
support@fold3.com
Ancestry
Inc. Corporate Headquarters
360 West 4800 North
Provo, UT 84604
Ph 801-705-7000
Fx 801-705-7001
support@ancestry.com
360 West 4800 North
Provo, UT 84604
Ph 801-705-7000
Fx 801-705-7001
support@ancestry.com
In 18+
years, I’ve never seen anything like this, and it is a sad day for the world of
public domain, public information, public record and the idea of “Freedom of
Information”.
I have
vowed from day 1, never to fall into the pit of desire of placing a price tag
on PUBLIC information. It’s a shame I am very much alone in that belief.
Sincerely,
John
Greenewald, Jr.
The Black Vault
http://www.theblackvault.com
The Black Vault
http://www.theblackvault.com
