Anyone
who has been paying attention knows that I have little faith that the new
emphasis on investigations into UFO or UAP sightings will generate much in the
way of increased information. We have been told that sightings by military
personnel will be born classified, meaning that the information will not be
freely available. And we have been told that the investigations will
concentrate on those military sightings.
However,
on next Tuesday, May 17, according to the latest information, there will be a
briefing that will focus on last year’s briefing of 144 reports with 143 of
them remaining unexplained.
Here’s
the interesting thing about this. The House Intelligence Committee’s
subcommittee on Counterterrorism, Counter Intelligence and Counterproliferation
will hold the hearing that will be followed by a classified hearing by the
Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group (AOIMSG). This a
ridiculous name that does more to obscure than to explain. In the past there
have been much better names but, in the world today, if it isn’t overly
complicated, well, it just isn’t worth the effort.
And,
all this doesn’t bode well because it seems the unclassified event has little
relevance to UFOs and the part that would deal directly with the UFOs is
classified. That, of course, is my reading based on limited information. There
could well be an examination of some of the UFO (I detest the name UAP) that
has been collected, but I suspect the national security blanket will be thrown
around.
Adam
Schiff said that the hearing would “give the public an opportunity to hear
directly from subject matter experts and leaders in the Intelligence Community
on one of the greatest mysteries of our time and to break the cycle of
excessive secrecy and speculation with truth and transparency.”
I
do wonder who these “subject matter experts” are. Will they be the same ones
that have been talking about UFOs recently, or are they going to bring in
someone who has been around the field for a long time (Jerry Clark and Mike
Swords spring to mind here) … and will they be skeptical or from the other side
of the fence? Depending on your point of view, it would be very simple to
select the subject matter experts based not on their dispassionate research,
but someone who had the proper orientation. Governmental transparency is a
tricky thing. All we have to look at other governmental committee investigations
and we can see the agenda of those who are participating.
I
have to say, while Schiff might believe that, I don’t believe it will happen,
given past experience. Project Sign, in 1948, was supposed to be a high
priority investigation, but the Air Force Chief of Staff didn’t like some of
the conclusions drawn and the project basically died. Ed Ruppelt came in with
orders to revitalize the investigation, which he did, but the Robertson Panel
of 1953 convinced both the military and civilian leadership that there was
nothing to UFOs. The Air Force sponsored University of Colorado study was
supposed to be unbiased and scientific, but it was compromised from the very
beginning by bias and a lack of science. What happened was a real desire to
find answers in the beginning eventually degenerated into public relations and
explanations that make no logical sense. The Levelland sightings, spread over
multiple witnesses and locations were eventually explained by ball lightning…
something that scientists still wonder if truly exists.
But,
as always, there are still interesting sightings to report from the last two
months. On April 22 of this year, the witness, in Orlando, Florida, reported
that she had set multiple hunting trackers which have produced a number of UFO
photos. She said that she watched an alien climb into his spacecraft. She said
that he allowed her to take photographs of his ship, but apparently none of
him. The ship is dull black and slightly larger than a jet fighter.
She
said that the alien is monitoring our space program. She said that the alien
can jam cell phone signals to prevent a video. She also mentioned that the
government has flown in to talk to her. And yes, I am somewhat reluctant to
report this, but the report is real. I don’t want to make the mistake the Air
Force did by rejecting nearly all reports of alien creatures as a psychological
problem on the part of the witness. As the old prospector said, you don’t
expect to find gold but that shouldn’t stop you from looking. The question here
is whether or not the observations are real but there is the photo that can be
seen here.
You
can read the whole report here:
https://www.ufosnw.com/newsite/photo-taken-of-fast-moving-tic-tac-ufo/
On
another note, is a photo from Vista, California on March 17 of this year. The
witness was playing golf at the Vista Valley Golf Course when he sighted a circular
object with a vertical fin. The UFO was a flat, circular craft with the back
quarter cut off. There was no sound and he used a four-power rangefinder to get
a better look at it. He took four pictures of it before it disappeared behind
the hills.
The UFO is barely visible next to the tree on the hill on the horizon. |
Now you can see the object. You can, of course, click on the pictures to get a better view. |
As
always, I provide some of this information because the cases are interesting,
but don’t endorse them unless I can find additional confirmation. If I have an
update on these sightings, I will post relevant information the blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment