For
those interested, I was at the Roswell Festival over the July 4th
weekend. I look at this as an opportunity to connect with other UFO researchers
and those who had UFO experiences. This year, among those there were Don
Schmitt, Travis Walton, Kathleen Marden, Ben Hansen, Thom Reed, Frank Kimbler, Marc
D’Antonio and Dennis Balthaser. Along with the individual presentations, there
were panel discussions on the Roswell case and alien abductions.
| The International UFO Museum and Research Center in Roswell. |
Ironically,
I sat in on the Abduction Panel with Travis and Kathleen. I was there to talk
about the Hickson/Parker abduction from Pascagoula in 1973. What had impressed
me about this case was there were witnesses to the abduction, four of them
named in an Air Force document dated the next day. That underscored the
validity of the report.
Kathleen
mentioned that there were similar revelations about the Barney and Betty Hill
case, meaning additional witnesses, not to mention the radar tracking from
Pease AFB and an Air Force investigation that was less then reliable. She
didn’t supply the names of the witnesses and I didn’t ask, which I should have.
She
also mentioned there had been some updated work on the Marjorie Fish star map
model that had been described by Betty Hill. Fish gathered astronomical data
about the stars around our sun out to about fifty light years. It was Fish who
discovered that the Zeta Reticuli star system might be the home world of some
of the alien visitors.
![]() |
| Kathleen Marden |
In
the past, I had been critical of Fish’s work. It was an exceptional job, but
the data she used was now out of date. Star system distances have been updated
with some moving in and others moving out of her designed range. She also left
out red dwarf stars because there are so many within fifty light years of
Earth. Her thinking was there would be no reason to visit those systems, but
our latest data suggests some of red dwarf systems are worthy of attention. I
mention this here but it didn’t come up during the panel discussion.
One
of the things about the festival is that you get to meet many people who have
had UFO experiences. Of those, a man of about thirty-five or forty told me
about seeing an object come out of the sea, hesitate for several seconds and
then climb away at high speed. He was close enough to get a good look at it. He
said the UFO was rounded, maybe more egg-shaped than circular and had a blue
haze surrounding it.
I
also talked with a guy who had seen a triangular-shaped UFO that hovered
overhead for four to five minutes, before drifting to the west. As it began to
move, an Air Force fighter appeared in the east. I’m not sure if that was
coincidence or deliberate, but the presence of the fighter appeared to have
caused the rapid acceleration of the UFO.
And
I talked to a few people who had multiple sightings. In the Project Blue Book
days, they would have been labeled as repeaters and their reports would be automatically
rejected. One of the men talked of seeing glowing balls of light in the
distance, somewhat reminiscent of the World War II Foo Fighters.
I
always thought of the repeaters as being lucky. There was a man, not at the
festival, who, according to the Guinness Book of World Records had been struck
by lightning five times. The very definition of a repeater who proved that some
people were in the right place (or in his case the wrong place) to make
multiple sightings.
The
point here is that it is never proper technique to dismiss a witness or
evidence because of a personal bias. Some people have the luck and some don’t.
I’ve said that my only possible sighting was a point of light in a polar orbit
seen in early 1967. Given the timing, I don’t believe it was one of ours,
meaning Earth based, but then it was just a point of light flying from north to
south at a steady speed.
There
was a panel discussion about the Roswell case but it didn’t dwell on the
well-known aspects of it. There was a question about the destruction of
classified material during that panel and a fact that was discovered by the
search for documents. There is also the question about why documents of
historical significance would be destroyed. Although there is talk of a
nefarious purpose, I noted that as an intelligence officer, I had destroyed
many documents. Most were irrelevant to my mission and others were out of date,
requiring destruction.
I
did note that those communications and documents created at the highest levels
would have been preserved but without a proper name we might never find them. I
mentioned a FOIA request I had submitted for a document. I had the name of the
document, the name of the author, the name of the organization for which it was
created and the date on the document. My request was refused because they
wanted more specific information. It was an excuse to refuse releasing the
material by fulfilling the requirements of the FOIA law without providing the
requested information.
Maria
Tellier, the MUFON New Mexico director gave a presentation on the 1964 Holloman
UFO landing. The case was the alleged communication between one of the alien
races visiting Earth and several high-ranking humans stationed at Holloman AFB.
According to information published in UFO’s Past, Present and Future by
Robert Emenegger in 1974, “The [base] commander and two officers, along two
base Air Force scientists arrive [at the UFO landing site] and wait
apprehensively. A panel slides open on the side of the craft.
“Stepping
forward, there are one, then a second and a third – what appear to be men
dressed in tight-fitting jump suits. Perhaps short by our standards, with an
odd gray-green complexion, eyes set wide apart. A large, pronounced nose. They
wear headpieces that resemble rows of a rope-like design.”
I
mention all this for those who might not be aware of the rumored landing of a
craft at Holloman Air Force Base. According to Emenegger, there is film of the
landing. While I find the tale wild even by UFO standards, Tellier provided an
interesting take on the story.
There
were a wide range of other activities, most of which I didn’t attend. The festival
has expanded beyond the research aspects of the Roswell case to become a
celebration of alien visitation. Many of the businesses have an alien theme and
one of the McDonald’s restaurants has a definite flying saucer aspect to it.
| The Roswell Flying Saucer McDonal's Restaurant. |
There
were a costume contest, a 5K race and a parade. Main Street in front of the
museum was closed off for vendors who provided a variety of food and other
souvenirs. Of course, it was hot out in the street, so I stayed in the museum
where there was air conditioning.
| Main Street closed and filled with the vendors. |
Finally,
one comment. During Travis’s presentation, two young men who had a video camera
and an agenda, interrupted the show to ask pointed questions. It was clear that
they were looking for clicks and while it was Travis’s job to answer those
questions, they should have waited until the presentation was over. The
audience had no interest in their opinions. Sometimes those playing journalist
seem to believe they are owed answers. In reality, they should have been
interested in the truth rather than creating a video for clicks.
I
had a very good time in Roswell. The staff of the museum was courteous and
worked to make sure everything ran smoothly. The one unscripted presentation
came when one of the speakers didn’t arrive. Don was asked to fill in, and I
suggested we do something together. It had been a long time since we had been
on stage together, but it worked well. As Don said later, “Just like old
times.”
We
have already talked about doing that next year.
And
as a commercial message, I have a new UFO book to be published on August 25,
called UFO Sightings and Alien Visitation. It is a book that follows my
chasing footnotes, providing some solutions to UFO cases and underscoring the
reality of others.


No comments:
Post a Comment