has been a bit of a controversy lately. Travis Walton and Mike Rogers are at
odds with one another and some have interpreted this to mean that Rogers no
longer supports the story of Walton’s abduction. I read a number of posts about
it and they were confusing. It was unclear if Rogers was saying, finally, that
the abduction was a hoax, or maybe something less exciting. His words were that
he no longer supported Travis Walton.
I know Rogers to some extent. We have communicated over the last couple of years. I did meet him once, in 1997, in Roswell. Nothing long and involved. He and Walton were finishing a presentation and the next person up was Russ Estes. I was there with Estes and we all just said, “Hello.” Walton and Rogers left before Estes took the microphone and began to speak.
have had Rogers on my radio show and you can listen to that interview by
scrolling through the listings on the embedded audio player. Just look for Mike
Rogers. I believe there is a problem with one segment in the first or second
hour of the interview that we failed to get fixed. You can read about it here:
I emailed Rogers about all this. I thought I understood the situation. It
seemed that Walton and Rogers had a falling out over a personal matter. It was
strong enough that Rogers wasn’t going to support Walton, which I took to mean
that he wasn’t going to be with him on any interviews or at any presentations.
It wasn’t that Rogers was repudiating the abduction tale. He was severing his
connection to Walton over this personal matter.
during the email exchange, Rogers sent the following, “You
must realize that none of us witnesses saw Travis get abducted.
That in itself speaks volumes. The further this goes the more I wonder.”
The emphasis is in the original. He added, “You can quote me on that.”
Yes, we can say that they all passed polygraph tests, or rather
most of them did. But those first tests were about the Rogers’ team having
murdered Walton and not about the abduction. Walton failed his first polygraph
but subsequently passed two others. Walton has said that the first test was
flawed because the polygrapher didn’t believe in UFOs and thought the whole
thing was a hoax. The alleged test wasn’t a properly conducted test. Walton has
a point here. You can, of course, read all about that in Walton’s Fire in
|Steve Pierce Photo copyright by Randle
did talk with Steve Pierce several years ago about this, and the story that he
and Philip Klass had talked about Pierce recanting. Klass would pay ten
thousand dollars for that. I covered all this years ago and you can read about
will note here that none of those who were involved in the sighting and the
subsequent events that night has ever said that it was a hoax. All have
remained a solid front about the case. The statement by Rogers to me just hours
ago is the first crack in the wall. You have to wonder about the line, “You must realize that none of us witnesses saw Travis
get abducted.” Is there a deeper meaning hidden there?
When I began this minor quest, I had hoped clarify the situation
but I now fear that I have muddied the water even more. I’m not sure what to
make of all this?
And, I have reached out to Walton although he hasn’t answered an email
from me in a couple of years. I had invited him on the radio show but his last
comment was, “What’s the point?” I have not heard back from him, but then, I
didn’t send the email all that long ago. If there is a reply, I’ll post it too.