Once
again, I have some interesting results from the MADAR system. Although it has
been operation for years, starting from just a couple of node centers to a
point where there are hundreds with centers around the world, it is only
recently that there have been positive results that might take us to a better
understanding of the UFO phenomenon.
One
of the areas of research that would change the dynamic of the UFO arena is the
idea of a mothership. The theory goes that these are huge craft capable of
carrying smaller, atmospheric craft. These are the smaller UFOs reported by so
many and this eliminates one of the arguments against the idea of alien
visitation. Once the mothership has crossed the astronomical distances (pun
intended) between the alien home world and Earth, these nightly excursions
become simpler. They don’t have to travel back and forth to their home, but
only the to the mothership. If you think about it, that changes the dynamic.
 |
| Navy cockpit video suggesting a strange object flying near the fighter. |
Here's
the real point of this theoretical analysis. Fran Ridge reported that, as he
was reviewing MADAR data, with a particular interest in a sighting that was
close to his center, he found the following case which I have reported on
before.
On
August 29, 2022, fifteen miles from Haubstadt, Indiana, the two-man crew of a
flight to St. Louis reported they encountered an object for two minutes. The
official report said. "We were on the Boosh 3 Arrival going into St Louis
approximately 160 miles ESE of [the] St. Louis Airport arriving from Newark New
Jersey. At 38,000 ft on our initial descent into St. Louis we saw this object
hovering at about 48 to 50 thousand feet. It looked like a floating sky scraper
with a ton of green and white lights. Object was rectangular, [described] as
huge. Report was filed by cockpit crew member.”
Here
was a report of what would be considered a mothership. Sightings of them are
rare and MADAR alerts are not caused by them because probes and motherships
probably don’t produce enough E-M effects for MADAR to pick up. This due
to dynamic forces needed to trigger MADAR and probably the altitude at which such
craft flying.
Okay,
but that sounds like just an excuse for the lack of results. This cloaking
behavior is a technological ability of the aliens to prevent our observation.
Ridge, in reviewing the MADAR data and sighting reports from various UFO
reporting sites including the National UFO Reporting Center, discovered that
the pilot’s sighting was detected by MADAR. Ridge wrote, “… since the line of
travel to St. Louis was east to west, I thought, what would be the chance sites
along the route would have picked up the UAP?” Yes, he used the term UAP.
He
continued, “Not only was this a mother ship described as a huge skyscraper, but
we tracked it all across southern Indiana, but as far as Norris City, Illinois
- six MADAR sites.”
Ridge
said, “This was our first time that we have documented what we term as a mother
ship.”
I’m thinking there is something more impressive than that. There was a sighting by two pilots that was confirmed by the instrumentality of the MADAR system. Not only that, as Ridge noted, there were six sites involved which reduces the odds of error. While this doesn’t prove there is alien visitation, given there is a visual sighting and detections from six centers as the object flew across the Midwest it certainly suggests that. This is something the scientific community and the various new government investigations should be interested in. The information, sighting and MADAR alerts are all properly documented.
You can read the full report, created by Fran Ridge here:
https://www.nicap.org/match/Correlations/2022/20220829-H/Skyscraper.pdf
10 comments:
Honestly, I have always taken for granted that alien visitation involves the presence of motherships. After all, as the late Stanton Friedman repeatedly and rightfully pointed out in many of his presentations, lectures, and books, there have been numerous reports of large, cigar-shaped motherships, and there have also been many sightings of smaller, disc-shaped craft that appeared to enter and exit these larger vessels. So, it has always seemed obvious to me that the extraterrestrials visiting Earth arrive here aboard motherships, while the flying saucers and the other smaller craft that are more frequently observed are simply Earth excursion modules.
Well stated Kevin. A multiple witness event corroborated by instrumentality should be of interest to anyone having an interest in the UFO problem. See you in Roswell.
A large "mothership" containing and launching smallish UFOs is really not any different than our own aircraft carriers for smallish craft such jet fighters, helicopters, etc. Both are means of projecting force close to theaters of operation rather than having to travel long distances for each mission. It's obviously a more logical and efficient means of doing whatever you are up to. Humans do it; why wouldn't aliens?
We should also not be too surprised by nearby bases such as on the Moon or Mars or asteroids (etc.), or even hidden on Earth, including under the oceans. It would depend on the scope and purpose of them being here. These bases could even include factories using materials from within our solar system to manufacture unlimited numbers of UFOs, for whatever they are up to. (So we might also expect mining operations for raw materials.) That's also much more efficient rather than manufacturing back on some home world and transporting here. (It also means you might not be able to distinguish alien from human-made materials based solely on isotope ratios.)
Dave can I get a HQ .tiff or other uncompressed file of the Ramey memo?
I’m posting two parts for this the original one was too long.
Part 1: OK after reading what you wrote and the actual report I do have a couple of questions. First things first I get that this is a preliminary report, however, the pilot said that they saw the object anywhere between “ 48,000 to 50,000 feet”. How did they determine this? Also, how far away were they? How big was this object and if so, how did they determine the size of it? If they were pretty close, then I could understand why they could make a rough guess on how they determined the altitude and the shape. However, if they were far away then that might call into question how high or low this object was and the actual shape of this “UFO”. For example, if an object is far away it could look like a “rectangle with lights on” in reality, it’s something completely else. Going off by the report it doesn’t look like they interviewed the pilot as of yet, although it looks like they’re trying to get into contact with the individuals. However, I would not say by any means that this is something alien or extraterrestrial. First things first there isn’t enough evidence that at this point that this supposed object is something extraterrestrial. Additionally, just because you have some witnesses and some data doesn’t necessarily get you to its “extraterrestrial.” For all you know the object could have a terrestrial explanation. For example, the object could’ve been, let’s say an airship, using a form of lighter than air propulsion. Given the altitude of the object (if correct.) it might’ve been something military related. I do have a friend of mine that works as a private contractor in Ohio and he told me that they often test certain airships/drones in and around the Ohio river, which is definitely in the facility of where this object was seen. Regardless, I wouldn’t be so eager to rush to conclusions that this is something alien related or is suspected to be alien. While the theory is interesting, as per usual with the UFO field, we need more substantial evidence to prove that this is something extraterrestrial. An object seen by two witnesses and some data while definitely proving there was “something” that doesn’t quite get us to “it aliens”.
Part 2: Another thing, Kevin, while I was not able to access “the more detailed description” link under the report (the link wasn’t working), I don’t recall there ever being a description of the vehicle “cloaking”. Although I think that you were making a point that vehicles cloaking are characteristic of UFO/extraterrestrial vehicles. But that’s not the point here. The point here is that I’m not convinced that this is a characteristic that is contributed to something extraterrestrial. For example, there is human technology that’s out there like “active camouflage technology” that we’ve been working on decades. For example, things like “light-emitting diodes (LEDs), electroluminescent paints and panels, thin form factor LCD screens” or “fluorescent panels and meta-materials” can be used to help blend in the craft visually to where it’s practically invisible to the naked eye. Henceforth having a “cloaking effect“ described in several if not many UFO encounters.
Another example is in an article in popular magazine called “Hiding in plain sight” where they say the following concerning certain skins that can be used to hide vehicles visually “The skin is derived from an electromagnetically conductive polyaniline-based radar-absorbent composite material. It is optically transparent except when electrically charged, much like the LCDs used in laptop computers. What makes this new material attractive is that it can change brightness and color instantaneously.” There’s more to the article, but I obviously cannot quote everything. The implication here is that there are vehicles that we are developing on where we are able to visually cloak something. Overall, I don’t really believe that this is necessarily alien technology and we should not jump to the conclusion that “cloaking technology” is somehow associated with extraterrestrial technology when to this day we still don’t even know if we’re actually being visited. I do come at this from a different perspective, which is, just because we see something weird or unknown doesn’t necessarily make it aliens. If you wanna read more about active camouflage, there’s a really good article on the Warzone that talks about this title: Can The U.S. Military Make An Airplane Invisible To The Naked Eye?
Scotland -
First, this is a preliminary report that was interesting because it involved eyewitnesses and apparent confirmation by six different MADAR Node Centers. If we eliminate the pilot report, we still have an interesting sighting because of the six Node Centers detecting the object, whatever it was, independently.
Second, no, I wasn't making a point that "cloaking are characteristic of UFO/extraterrestrial vehicles" and probably shouldn't have used that word. The point was that these large, "motherships" are not often seen and are not normally detected by the MADAR system. A better word would have been using stealth technology to avoid detection. With the Coast-to-Coast AM reports, I have limited time and "cloaking" seemed to be an expedient way of conveying the information.
Third, the aircraft was at 38,000 feet and the pilots were looking up toward the UFO which meant that it was above them.
So, what we have is the sighting of something that seemed to be huge, that it had many lights on it, and it was detected by instrumentality on the ground. An interesting sighting that deserves additional investigation. It is currently unidentified, which could mean that it was of alien construction or that it was of terrestrial manufacture (and I say that because of the MADAR detections meaning it wasn't a hallucination, illusion or hoax).
And yes, this report doesn't lead us directly to alien, but it takes us in that direction. Once the investigation is completed, we might have a terrestrial answer or we might have something unknown... which, by itself doesn't mean it was alien.
Try: https://libraries.uta.edu/roswell/ramey-memo
These are the scans we did almost exactly 10 years ago back in 2015. They were done on an Image Data ScanPro3000 microfiche scanner.
Whether you call it cloaking, stealth, or camouflage, it amounts to rendering an object more difficult to detect by some sensory system, be it radar or eyeballs. There are fine distinctions between the means by which this is carried out.
Camouflage has been around forever, including in the plant and animal kingdoms. Basically you are just trying to blend in to the background by reducing contrast of various kinds. Things like green frogs in a green forest or zebra stripes are fixed, passive camouflage for visible light, whereas animals like chameleons and octopi have active camouflage that can change with the background. (You have probably seen the film of a diver approaching a seeming rock, only to have part of it suddenly spring away as an octopus. The octopus had disguised itself as a part of that rock by adopting the same color and texture in its skin. It was truly "invisble" until it panicked and darted away, breaking camouflage.) In a military plane, this would probably be called "visible stealth" rather than "camouflage", but it amounts to the same thing.
Our WWII flying sub-hunters used a cruder but still very effective means of active camouflage using a different principle to reduce contrast to the eyes of German sub-spotters on surfaced submarines. The sub-hunters had lights on them whose brightness changed so that the whole plane's apparent brightness matched the background sky. By reducing brightness contrast to a minimum, the planes became much less visible at a distance, enabling the sub-hunters to get much closer before they were detected.
More modern attempts at this involve trying to be more like an octopus and adopting the brightness, color, and pattern of the background on your outer skin. This isn't exactly the same as a futuristic Klingon cloaking device which instead turns you into something like a black hole bending spacetime around you so that background EM radiation of all frequencies (radar, visible light, etc.) is bent around you so that the U.S.S. Enterprise only sees the background. (Essentially hiding inside a warp bubble.)
The point is a "mothership" could render itself relatively invisible to radar and visible light through a variety of techniques, including some that could be relatively simple and already well-known to us, such as active camouflage. A fancier Klingon-like "cloaking" device may not be necessary.
Post a Comment