(Blogger's Note: I attributed an article in the International UFO Reporter to Dr. Swords. The article has no byline on it and my attribution was in error. Dr. Swords did make a reference to the case in the September 2011 IUR, but it is only the name of the case in a table about "skin burn" cases. I have updated this article so that the attribution is proper. It does appear in the IUR in 1978 but the article is unattributed.)
Dr. Michael Swords has suggested in an article in the IUR, "Can UFOs Cause physiological Effects, Part 2 (September 2011) that there are cases that demonstrate there are side effects to UFO sightings that can be investigate (which I mention here only because it was in that article I found the reference to Kerman). While there is not a bit of metal to take into the laboratory in this case, there are the physical reactions of the witness, police officer Manuel Amparano, who was a veteran of five years on the force. Had the situation developed differently, there was research that could have been conducted, but wasn’t.
Dr. Michael Swords has suggested in an article in the IUR, "Can UFOs Cause physiological Effects, Part 2 (September 2011) that there are cases that demonstrate there are side effects to UFO sightings that can be investigate (which I mention here only because it was in that article I found the reference to Kerman). While there is not a bit of metal to take into the laboratory in this case, there are the physical reactions of the witness, police officer Manuel Amparano, who was a veteran of five years on the force. Had the situation developed differently, there was research that could have been conducted, but wasn’t.
According
to the information available, including that in the APRO Bulletin of August 1978, Amparano was on late night-early
morning patrol when he spotted, what he thought was a fire in the distance. He
thought it might be youngsters setting palm trees on fire, but as he neared an
intersection, saw that it was something else.
According
to an article in the September 1978 issue of the IUR, “…at 3:32 a.m. … he observed a reddish glow ahead of him… he drove
to the site and pulled off the road by a cotton field near railroad tracks in
time to see an unusual source of illumination… up in the southern sky.”
Coral
Lorenzen reported that “The object was hovering, was a ‘silver aluminum, round’
craft which the witness approached fairly close.”
Amparano
later said that the oval-shaped object was twice as wide as it was high and
that it was a bright crimson, about half as large as the full moon. He said
that it was about one hundred to one hundred fifty feet off the ground and that
it was twenty-five to fifty feet in diameter. He was close enough to it and it
was large enough that there was no question that it wasn’t some sort of
conventional craft.
As
it hovered overhead, it glowed with an intensity that did not hurt his eyes. He
watched it out of the side window of the car for about four minutes until a
bright blue beam shot out of the craft that Amparano described like that of a
flash from a camera. The UFO then climbed out silently toward the southeast,
and finally disappeared straight up in seconds.
Although
he felt a slight tingling, he thought it was the results of the cold night. He
drove back to the station. There he met several fellow officers and the police
chaplain, who mentioned that he looked as if he had been sunburned. According
to Swords, the sunburn lasted for about four hours before fading.
The IUR article noted that at 7:00 p.m. that night, Amparano went to the hospital for treatment
of second and third degree burns to his face, neck and arms. The trip to the
hospital was documented in various hospital records and because of the injury,
he applied for, or his boss, the chief of police applied for, worker’s
compensation. That too was documented.
It
would seem that something that large, that bright and that close to the ground
would have been seen by someone else. Although it was very early in the
morning, there were others who said they had seen the same thing. Lorenzen
reported:
…
Lisa Harrison’s husband had driven his cement-mixer truck to Los Angeles for an
overnight job and she wasn’t able to sleep, so she was watching the late show
on television. She was sitting next to the living room window of her apartment
in Kerman… Suddenly, at 3:30 A.M., she heard a strange loud whirring noise and
the house began to vibrate. She took three quick steps to the front door to see
what was happening. Looking toward the northwest, she saw two lights moving
towards the South at tree-top level. The leading light was white and the rear
light was reddish, but “not like the red lights on airplanes.” She described
the lights as large, but couldn’t estimate how large. Mrs. Harrison ran back
into the house after the object went out of sight behind some houses to the
south.
Harrison
isn’t the only other witness to be found. Amparano, on his way back to the
station, had stopped at a parking lot near Highway 145 and Interstate 80 for a
few minutes. There he found Phil Mahler, who was delivering newspapers for the Fresno Bee. Mahler said that he had seen
what he called “a reddish ball in the sky.”
There
were still other, somewhat ambiguous reports. According to something referred
to as the “a Seattle-based phenomenon research center,” an astronomer in Fresno
reported a “reddish ball” close to the ground.
At
about the same time someone called the Fire Department to report a fire that
was in a direct line from where Amparano saw the UFO. The Fire Department said
that they found no evidence of a fire.
After
Amparano’s sighting was reported Ken Westbrook, Jr. who had been raking hay at
the Gilory Farm west of Kerman said that he had seen a glowing “orange ball,”
at treetop level. He watched it for some thirty to forty seconds as it “just
kind of drifted around a little bit.”
At
the station, Amparano called the Air Guard, the Fresno Airport and the weather
bureau, wondering if they had anything on their radar scopes, or if there had
been any other reports. While he was making the telephone calls, police
officers A. J. Byington and Bob Muller, saw the burn marks on his face. They
then discovered that Amparano had been burned through his shirt as well. At
that point, they all returned to the cotton field, but there was nothing there
to be seen.
According
to other sources, it was at 5:00 p.m. that evening that Amparano woke and was
feeling sick. That was when he went to the Fresno Community Hospital emergency
room. There his burns were noted and listed as coming from an unknown source.
It was also noted his blood pressure was high and later, a private doctor said
that he suffered from “high intensity fluorescent pipe light or a gamma ray.”
What
is important here is that these injuries, regardless of source, were documented
by the hospital authorities, and there was that worker’s compensation claim
that was also filed which further corroborated the injuries.
At
this point Police Chief James Van Cleaf decided that he wanted nothing about
the sighting to be released to the press or to UFO researchers. He told
Amparano not to talk to them. According to Lorenzen:
A
reporter went to the Amparano home after learning the identity of the officer,
but was told that Amparano wasn’t available for an interview. Mrs. Amparano
said that Chief Van Cleaf had told her husband not to talk to anyone about the
incident, least of all out-of-town reporters. She thought that her husband
would be willing to talk – he had nothing to hide – but only if the Chief said
it was all right. But Van Cleaf was adamant – no interviews.
This
order also seemed to apply to members of other law enforcement agencies. On
June 26, 1978, according to a sheriff’s department memorandum that was sent to
Amparano, “Saw the article and was impressed with your [sighting] … one of our
sgts. (mike soderberg) experienced much the same thing as you did… no burns
however… no one really knows at this point what really exists out there in
space!!!”
While
interesting, it’s not clear if the sighting was at the same time and exactly
what Soderberg saw, other than it was similar. This could be further
corroboration of the sighting, but at this point no one has followed up on it.
In
July 2014, Jason Marzek, writing for Fringe
Republic, contacted Amparano, who responded to him. In that email, Amparano
wrote:
The
UFO… was behind the trees lining the west side of Del Norte Avenue and near the
ground hovering midway below the tree tops which gave the impression the tree
was on fire… The UFO was first sighted at Trinity and Shaw Avenues by a Fresno
County resident who called the North Central Fire Department Kerman Station and
reported a grass fire in a field…The fire men arrived on the scene and found no
evidence of a fire… A short time later Thomas Addis was working in a vineyard…
when he observed a fire ball moving at tree top level… Also five Kerman Police
Personnel observed my physical appearance when I reported for duty and
confirmed that I was not sunburned prior to going on patrol. Officers A. J.
Byington, Bob Muller, Bill McKinney, Jon Crouch and Chaplin Tom Johnson were
with me inside a well light police station. Fresno Community Doctors, Allen Mau
and T. T. Shigyo reported that officer had a sun burnt condition when examined
at community hospital. Dr. Shigyo said that microwaves can burn the flesh
through clothing without damaging the cloth. Chief Van Cleaf requested workman
compensation for on the job injury.
This
case becomes important because it has multiple chains of evidence. There was
the physical effect which was the burns suffered by Amparano and documented by
the hospital records, and observed by his fellow police officers. There were
additional witnesses to the red object in the sky at about the time that
Amparano made his sighting which creates another chain of testimony.
Had
the chief of police reacted with a more open response, some of that additional
testimony might have been documented as well. Tests could have been conducted
on the police car which might have yielded some interesting results.
Unfortunately, as has happened all too often, the chief was probably afraid of
adverse publicity and his response was to limit access to the witnesses.
Here
the opportunity was lost to gather additional evidence. This might have yielded
something of scientific importance. It might not have been related to alien
visitation but some sort of rare natural phenomenon. Whatever the case, the
opportunity for a proper investigation was missed.
