As
I was looking for something else, I stumbled across a diary page that had been
given to me some twenty years ago. It was one of the very few documents that
suggested that what fell outside of Roswell was something alien or that was
what I had been told it meant. The two entries that were relevant said, “7-4-47
Object down – 2317 – Radar Target Gone,” and “7-5-47 Found Wreckage 0200…”
![]() |
| Diary page suggesting the UFO crash. |
I
also interviewed a former member of the 1395th MP Company who had
been stationed in Roswell in July 1947. Leo Spear told me on June 3, 1994, that
he was a PVT E2 (according to him but the Yearbook identifies him as a PFC) in
July 1947, but that he had been with the military police company. He had not
been assigned to guard duty involving any of the material recovered, but did
talk about it with his friends who had been involved. He said, “…it was the
next morning when they came in with a cock and bull story… they said, ‘You know
what? They brought in some stuff from a UFO. And that it had crashed north of
Roswell.’”
Yes,
he did say UFO but then, in 1994, that is not surprising and I would suspect
that in 1947 they had said flying saucer. To me it wasn’t much of a problem.
The important point here is that he said that he thought they were crazy until
the next day when he saw in the newspaper that they had picked up pieces of a
flying saucer. He realized that it wasn’t a cock and bull story, but that
something had happened.
There
was also Corporal E.L. Pyles, who said that while he and a friend were out
walking on the base when they saw something streak across the sky. He did say
that it was in a downward motion, and according to the information he had given
Don Schmitt, this was during the first week or so of July 1947.
This
fits, generally, with what William Woody had said. Woody told me that it was a
white light with red streaks in it. He said that it glowed brightly and unlike
the other meteors he’d seen, it took a long time to fall. Given what we had
been told, and with the documentation that we had been given, we dated this to
July 4, 1947. Woody did say that a few days after seeing the object he and his
father had attempted to go find it, but the roads to the west of the main
highway north out of town were blocked by military vehicles. This helped
establish the time frame for the sighting.
The
nun’s story came from a man who said he was a former officer in the Special
Forces, meaning the Green Berets, and he had talked with a nun or a former nun
in Roswell, who had seen a diary enter. According to what we were told, the
nuns’ diary entries dated the event to July 4, sometime prior to midnight. I
believed, back in the early 1990s that Don Schmitt, chasing the diaries, had
actually seen them. He says now that he did not.
Look
where we are on this. I have a document that was allegedly created in 1947
giving me times and a date. I have testimony from two men who saw an object in
the air in the right time frame. I have testimony from another man who reported
that friends in the 1395th MP Company had talked about recovery of a
flying saucer and was able to date it in the right time frame. And I have
others who mention the nuns’ diaries, at least two of whom claimed to have seen
them, giving me a time and a date for their observations. All this seems to be
pretty strong evidence… but let’s now look at it with our different perspective
of twenty years.
![]() |
| Leo Spear from the 509th Yearbook. |
The
document was given to me with instructions not to show it around because it was
still considered classified, so I didn’t mention it. I thought that it was
unnecessary because of the other evidence. That document, unfortunately, came
from Frank Kaufmann and it is not the only document he had altered or created.
He supplied other documents that seemed to corroborate his tale, including his
official Army discharge papers that listed him as a master sergeant with some
specialized intelligence training. We all now know that many of those documents
had been altered or created out of nothing at all. When we received his
official records from the Army, we learned that he had been a staff sergeant
and his training had been as an administrative specialist and a clerk/typist.
There was nothing to suggest he had ever been involved in any intelligence
functions, and no reason to believe the documents he gave me had not been
created by him to support his tales. The diary page was just one more fake and
that the supporting evidence could be rejected.
Corporal
Pyles was reported by Karl Pflock as being unable to remember what month he had
seen the object, though he did put it in 1947. In what I think of as an
incredibly inept bit of copy editing, in the paragraph that followed the one in
which Pyles couldn’t give a month of the sighting, he said, according to
Pflock, “A ‘few days later,’ he saw the ‘RAAF Captures Flying Saucer’ story…
and he wondered if what he and his friend had seen had anything to do with it.”
That
seemed to date the event to the first week in July, just as the information
from Leo Spear had done. Spear, of course, hadn’t seen anything, and Pyles had
just seen a streak of light in the night sky. Pyles told Pflock that it was
before midnight, which is an interesting detail for him to remember when he had
suggested he couldn’t even remember the month.
Pflock,
in his book, suggested that William Woody might have seen the same object as
that seen by Dan Wilmot at about 10:00 p.m. on July 2 when the Wilmots had
their sighting as reported in the Roswell
Daily Record. There is nothing to tie the reports together, other than both
Wilmot and Woody said the object was moving toward the north. Of course, there
is nothing to suggest that what Woody saw was what crashed either other than proximity
in time. But it does add an element of documentation to the whole case, even if
we don’t know if the object seen was the one that crashed or even anything of
alien origin.
Finally,
we return to the nuns’ diaries. As near as I can tell, based on the credibility
of the witnesses, meaning that the Green Beret officer was not, and I saw
nothing to suggest the nun or former nun was what she claimed to be, the
diaries do not exist. I was told about them, told what they said, and was told
by some that they had seen the diaries themselves. Given the other information
I had at the time, there was no reason to reject the evidence. With the
collapse of some of that information, I simply do not believe this anymore.
So,
where is this once strong bit of the Roswell UFO crash tale? Well, the
documentation is reduced to a newspaper clipping about Dan Wilmot that might
have nothing to do with the crash. Both the diary page submitted by Frank
Kaufmann and the alleged diary pages written by the nuns are either faked or
nonexistent. Since the nuns were never interviewed and their diaries never
found, anything said about them can be properly rejected. It is as if it never
existed because it probably never did.
On
the other hand, we have two men who saw something strange in the sky in early
July 1947. The descriptions offered, decades after the fact, match generally,
which means it could be the same object. It was traveling generally to the
north, and the debris found by Mack Brazel was to the north of Roswell. We can
suggest that this is the object that crashed, but the links are fairly weak, but
at least they are something.
This
once strong aspect of the case has been reduced to some testimony offered
decades after the fact, a newspaper clipping, and an MP who remembered his pals
talking about picking up pieces of a flying saucer but who had seen nothing
himself. It is just not very persuasive evidence when stripped to its bare
bones and we are left with very little to bolster the case.


